SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 57

Disintegrated groups over the issue of laicity and the role of certain psycho- social variables on out-group evaluations

Laiklik konusunda ayrışan gruplar ve belirli psiko-sosyal değişkenlerin dış-grup değerlendirmelerinde rolü

K. Oya PAKER
Sevim CESUR
Pages
51–76
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SRL s, In-Group Identity Engagement (IGIE), Religiosity , Contact with the Out-Group , Perceived Discrimination and Perceived Threat were analyzed in relation toOpenness to Intergroup Communication and Overall Evaluation of the Outgroup .

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the role of social representations of laicism (SRL) and some variables related to political views and attitudes as predicators of out-group evaluations among Turkish educated youth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data was collected from university students (N=625) belonging to different universities, faculties and departments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SRL s, In-Group Identity Engagement (IGIE), Religiosity , Contact with the Out-Group , Perceived Discrimination and Perceived Threat were analyzed in relation toOpenness to Intergroup Communication and Overall Evaluation of the Outgroup .
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the role of social representations of laicism (SRL) and some variables related to political views and attitudes as predicators of out-group evaluations among Turkish educated youth. The data was collected from university students (N=625) belonging to different universities, faculties and departments. SRL s, In-Group Identity Engagement (IGIE), Religiosity , Contact with the Out-Group , Perceived Discrimination and Perceived Threat were analyzed in relation toOpenness to Intergroup Communication and Overall Evaluation of the Outgroup . The groups were named by researchers as religious conservativesand republican laics according to the score type in the SRL Scale. According to the findings, religious conservatives had significantly higher scores on Religiosity , Contact and Perceived Discrimination , whereas the republican laics had significantly higher scores on IGIE and Perceived Threat . Contact , Perceived Threat , IGIE, Religious Conservative Laicism and Perceived Discrimination explained 32% of the variance as totally accounted for Overall Evaluation of the Out-Group .

Özet

Bu çalışmada laiklikle ilgili paylaşılan sosyal temsiller (LST) ve politik görüş ve tutumlarla ilgili belirli değişkenlerin, gruplararası iletişime açık olma ve dış-grup değerlendirmeleri üzerindeki rolü incelenmektedir. Araştırma verisi farklı üniversitelerde, çeşitli fakülte ve bölümlerde okuyan öğrencilerden (N=625) toplanmış; LST, İç-Grup Kimliğine Bağlılık (İGKB), Dindarlık, Dış-Grup ile Temas, Algılanan Ayrımcılık veAlgılanan Tehdit değişkenleriyle Gruplararası İletişime Açık Olma ve Dış- Gruba İlişkin Genel Değerlendirme arasındaki ilişkiler analiz edilmiştir. Soru formunu doldurarak araştırmaya katılanlar, laikliğin sosyal temsilleri ölçeğinde aldıkları puan türüne dayanarak araştırmacılar tarafından dinsel muhafazakârlar ve Cumhuriyetçi laikler olarak gruplanmıştır. Bulgulara göre dinsel muhafazakârlar olarak adlandırılan grup, Dindarlık, Dış-Grup ile Temas ve Algılanan Ayrımcılık değişkenlerinde anlamlı şekilde diğer gruptan yüksek puanlara sahipken, aynı şekilde Cumhuriyetçi Laikler olarak adlandırılan grup İGKB ve Algılanan Tehdit değişkenlerinde diğer gruptan daha yüksek puan almışlardır. Dış-Grup ile Temas, Algılanan Tehdit veİGKB, Dinsel Muhafazakârların Laiklik Algısı ve Algılanan Ayrımcılık, toplamda Dış-Grup Genel Değerlendirmesindeki varyansın %32sini açıklamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAKER, K. O., CESUR, S. (2022). Disintegrated groups over the issue of laicity and the role of certain psycho- social variables on out-group evaluations. Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 57, 51–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/648260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Kitap: Bilgin, N. (2007). Kimlik İnşası. İzmir:
  2. Aşina Kitaplar. Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage. Billig, M., Contor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D. ve Radley, A. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage. LeVine, R. A. ve Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of Conflict, Ethnic Attitudes and Group Behavior. New York: Wiley. Paker, K. O. (2005).
  3. Günlük Düşüncede Modernlik, Din ve Laiklik. Ankara:
  4. Vadi Yay. Sherif, M. ve Sherif, C. W. (1953). Groups in Harmony and Tension: An integration of studies on intergroup relations. New York: Harper. Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press. van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology. A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage. Editörlü kitapta yayımlanmış bölüm: Newcomb, T. (1965). Attitude development as a function of reference groups: The Bennington study. Yayımlandığı Kitap H. Proshansky ve B. Seidenberg (Editörler), Basic Studies in Social Psychology (215-230). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Stephan,W. G ve Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated theory of prejudice. Yayımlandığı Kitap S. Oskamp (Editör), Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (23-45).
  5. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Yayımlandığı Kitap W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Editörler), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (33-47).
  6. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Dergi makalesi: Brewer, M. B. (1999). The Psychology of Prejudice: In-group Love or Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. Billig, M. (1985). Prejudice, categorization and particularization: from a perceptual to a rhetorical approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 79-103.
  7. Davies, B. ve Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: the Discursive Production of Selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43-63.
  8. Dobbelaere, K. (1981). Secularization: A multi-dimentional concept. Current Sociology 29(2), 1-213.
  9. Dobbelaere, K. (1999). Towards an Integrated Perspective of the Processes Related to the Descriptive Concept of Secularization. Sociology of Religion, 60 (3), 229-247.
  10. Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Oz-Rojas, D. M., Invernizzi, F. ve Mugny, G. (2004). Perceived in-group threat as a factor moderating the influence of in-group norms on discrimination against foreigners. European Journal of Social Psycholo