Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

Determination of the Considerations of the Farmers about Irrigation Organizations by Factor Analysis

Pages
24–30
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to factor analysis results, 13 variables were gathered in three factor groups named as“Administration”, “Ownership and Service” and “Consciousness Raising”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the considerations of the farmers who were affiliated to the organizations undertakingthe irrigation administration in Edirne, Kırklareli, Tekirdağ and Çanakkale provinces about irrigationorganizations were analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the study, surveys were conducted in 70 irrigation cooperatives,67 municipality and legal entities, 7 irrigation unions and 1 DSI irrigation organization.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to factor analysis results, 13 variables were gathered in three factor groups named as“Administration”, “Ownership and Service” and “Consciousness Raising”.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the considerations of the farmers who were affiliated to the organizations undertakingthe irrigation administration in Edirne, Kırklareli, Tekirdağ and Çanakkale provinces about irrigationorganizations were analyzed. Within the scope of the study, surveys were conducted in 70 irrigation cooperatives,67 municipality and legal entities, 7 irrigation unions and 1 DSI irrigation organization. Total of 567, 113, 227and 7 surveys were conducted in the irrigation facilities administrated by irrigation cooperatives, irrigationunions, municipality and legal entities and DSI, respectively. Total of 301 surveys in 74 villages of 9 districts inEdirne, 168 surveys in 43 villages of 5 districts in Tekirdağ, 156 surveys in 36 villages of 4 districts in Kırklareliand 289 surveys in 69 villages of 11 districts in Çanakkale were conducted. The conclusions of the farmers wereevaluated by using five point likert scale. It was determined that the irrigation organizations did not notice thetraining of the farmers, did not include these trainings in their working schedules and similarly, they did notconduct studies aimed at the conscious and balanced use of the agricultural inputs. Factor analysis was used forthe evaluation of the considerations of the farmers about irrigation organizations. KMO and Barlett test statisticswas used in order to examine the convenience of the considerations to factor analysis and KMO value was foundas 0.891. According to factor analysis results, 13 variables were gathered in three factor groups named as“Administration”, “Ownership and Service” and “Consciousness Raising”.

🔖

Cite This Article

AZABAĞAOĞLU, Ö., ÖZKAN, E., HURMA, H., AYDIN, B., AKTAŞ, E. (2022). Determination of the Considerations of the Farmers about Irrigation Organizations by Factor Analysis. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 24–30. https://ajindex.com/articles/647902

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akıllı H (2011). “Participatory Irrigation Management” from Public Irrigation Management to Local and Private Irrigation Management: The Case of Antalya Irrigation Associations. Akdeniz University Institute of Social Sciences, PhD Thesis, Antalya (in Turkish). Aksoy Ş, İnan İH, Özdemir G, Gaytancıoğlu O, Kubaş A, Sağlam C, Azabağaoğlu Ö (1996). Economic structure and running of vegetable oil sector in Thrace Region. Turkey 2. Agricultural Economics Congress. September 4-6, Adana. pp. 387-397 (in Turkish). Albayrak AS (2006). Practical Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Asil Publications, Ankara, 163p (in Turkish). Alder HI, Roessler EB (1977). Introduction to Probability and Statistics, Sixth Edition, San Francisco, 1977, p. 165 Aydoğdu MH, Mancı AR, Aydoğdu M (2015). The overview and qualification of water user associations’ head to water management: GAP-Harran Plain samplings. Harran Journal of Agricultural and Food Science. 19 (3): 172-179 (in Turkish). Çakmak B, Yıldırım M, Aküzüm T (2008). Agricultural irrigation management in Turkey, problems and solutions. TMMOB 2. Water Policies Congress Proceedings Book, March 20-22,
  2. Ankara, Turkey, pp. 215-224 (in Turkish). Eminoğlu E (2007). Water management and irrigation administration in Turkey. Central Asia Irrigation Water Management Workshop, September 12-14,
  3. Ankara,
  4. Turkey, Soil Fertilizer and Water Resources Central Research Institute, 8p (in Turkish). Ertan A, Kaya MS (2012). Analysis of cooperative-member relations in Çünür irrigation cooperative. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 2012/2, 16: 117-129 (in Turkish). Gorsuch RL (1983),
  5. Factor Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.,ISBN 0-89859-202-X. Kalaycı Ş, Albayrak A S, Eroğlu A, Küçüksille E, Ak B, Karaltı M, Keskin HÜ, Çiçek E, Kayı ĢA, Öztürk E, Antalyalı ÖL, Uçar N, Demirgil H, İşler DB, Sungur O (2005). SPSS Practical Multivariate Statistics Techniques, Asil Publishing Co. Ltd. Publications, 1. Edition, Ankara (in Turkish). Kim J, Mueller CW (1978).
  6. Factor Analysis, What It Is and How Do It, Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage University Paper. Özkan E, Hurma H, Aydın B, Aktaş E (2011). Evaluating the irrigation cooperatives and irrigation unions in various aspects from producers’ perspective (Edirne, Kırklareli, Tekirdağ, Çanakkale provinces samples). Prof. Dr. Nuri Munsuz Soil and Water Symposium Proceedings Book. May 25-27, 2011,
  7. Ankara., Turkey, pp: 180-187 (in Turkish). Pe