Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

Effects of Different Microbial Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Tomato Grown in Greenhouse Condition

Pages
135–139
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is concluded that bothfruit quality and nutrient content could be significantly increased in tomato by using microbial organic fertilizers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Vegetables have protective and healing effects on human health due to the containing and the increaseof these substances are associated with their grown conditions especially organic means.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carriedout to determine the effects of LIFEBAC-NP (L), NSAH (N) and SALUS EXHILARE (S) microbial organicfertilizers consisting of microbial formulations and natural products of plant origin in different doses [1000mL/100 L (A), 3000 mL/100 L (B), 5000 mL/100 L (C) and control (no application) (D)] on yield and qualityof organic grown Cevahir F1 tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivar in greenhouse condition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is concluded that bothfruit quality and nutrient content could be significantly increased in tomato by using microbial organic fertilizers.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Vegetables have protective and healing effects on human health due to the containing and the increaseof these substances are associated with their grown conditions especially organic means. This study was carriedout to determine the effects of LIFEBAC-NP (L), NSAH (N) and SALUS EXHILARE (S) microbial organicfertilizers consisting of microbial formulations and natural products of plant origin in different doses [1000mL/100 L (A), 3000 mL/100 L (B), 5000 mL/100 L (C) and control (no application) (D)] on yield and qualityof organic grown Cevahir F1 tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) cultivar in greenhouse condition. The numberof fruit per plant, fruit weight per plant, total yield, fruit width and length, total soluble solid, pH, ascorbic acid,color properties, fruit shape index, dry matter yield parameters were evaluated on tomato cultivar. The fruitweight per plant and total yield in doses A and C treatments were found the highest in N microbial organicfertilizer. The fruit width in dose A treatment was determined the highest in L microbial organic fertilizer. Thehighest fruit shape index was obtained in D treatment and dose B of L treatment. The fruit number per plant(respectively 24.71 and 23.56), the total solid contents (5.80 %) and ascorbic acid contents (261.67 mg/l usare)in doses A and C treatments were found the highest in L microbial organic fertilizer. It is concluded that bothfruit quality and nutrient content could be significantly increased in tomato by using microbial organic fertilizers.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, E., DURSUN, A., TURAN, M., EKİNCİ, M., KARAGÖZ, F. P., KUL, R., GÖK, Z. (2022). Effects of Different Microbial Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Tomato Grown in Greenhouse Condition. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 135–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/647901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adesemoye OA; Torbert HA; Kloepper JW (2009). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb. Ecol., 58: 921–929. Anonymous (2018a). Bactogen organic fertilizers http://www.bactogen.com/eng/detay/products/organicfertilizers/ lifebac-np_6.htmlAccess date:13.03.2018 Anonymous (2018b). Bactogen organic fertilizers http://www.bactogen.com/eng/detay/products/organicfertilizers/ nsah_236.html Access date:13.03.2018 Anonymous (2018c). SalusBiotech. http://www.salusbiotech.com/tr/salus-exhilare/ Access date:13.03.2018
  2. Brown A (2007). Understanding food principles and preparation. Thomson Higher Education 10 Davis Drive Belmont, CA 9402- 3098, USA. Dorais M, Papadoulos AP, Gosselin A (2001). Greenhouse tomato fruit quality. In: Janick, J. (Ed.), Hortic. Rev. 26: 239-319.
  3. Dung PT, H’dok YKN, Tul E (2009). Microbial organic fertilizer application for safe coffee production at Daklak, Vietnam. FAOSTAT (2018). Food and agriculture organization of the united nations statistics division website. Available at http://www.fao.org/statistics/en/
  4. Higa T (1994). Effective microorganisms: A new dimension for nature farming. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. J.F. Parr, S.B. Hornick, and M.E. Simpson (eds.) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., p. 20-22.
  5. Higa T, Wididana GN (1991). The concept and theories of effective microorganisms. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming, J.F. Parr, S.B. Hornick, and C.E. Whitman (eds.) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., U.S.A., p. 118-124.
  6. Islam MA, Islam S, Akter A, Rahman MH, Nandwani D (2017). Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil properties and the growth, yield and quality of tomato in Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Agriculture, 7(3): 18. Jackson RM, Brown ME, Burlingham SK (1964). Similar effects on tomato plants of azotobacter ınoculation and application of gibberellins. Nature, 203(4947): 851-852.
  7. Kacar B (1972). Bitki ve toprağın kimyasal analizleri 1-2. A.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 468, Yardımcı Ders Kitabı: 161 Ligong X, Kun X, Huicheng L (2006). Effect of microbial organic fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of tomato [J]. China vegetables, 4: 003. Lopez Camelo AF, Gomez PA (2004). Comparison of color indexes for tomato ripening. Horticultura Brasileira 22: 534-537.
  8. McGuıre GR (1992). Reporting of objective color measurements. HortScience 27(12