SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3

First Report of the Endophytic Bacteria Associated with Phormidium sp.

Tuğba ŞENTÜRK
Mustafa OSKAY
Pages
602–608
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results highlighted the importance of endophytic bacteria associated with Phormidium sp. for the first time by using sequence-based identification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recent molecular studies on endophytic bacterial diversity have revealed a large richness of species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Associations between endobiotic bacterial-algae interactions have been studied for more than 40 years but were, up to now, never molecularly analyzed within the filamentous Cyanobacteria Phormidium.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results highlighted the importance of endophytic bacteria associated with Phormidium sp. for the first time by using sequence-based identification.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sphingomonas · Sphingopyxis · Stenotrophobacter

Abstract

Recent molecular studies on endophytic bacterial diversity have revealed a large richness of species. Associations between endobiotic bacterial-algae interactions have been studied for more than 40 years but were, up to now, never molecularly analyzed within the filamentous Cyanobacteria Phormidium. Therefore, the endophytic bacteria associated with fresh microalgae Phormidium, a group of ubiquitous photosynthetic organisms that play an important role in aquatic ecosystems, has been investigated. To study this partnership, Phormidium sp. was cultured in BG-11 medium using optimal conditions, and after the incubation period, cell biomass was obtained. Total genomic DNA from biomass was extracted and used for endophytic bacteria determination by using the 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing results revealed that a total of seven endophytic bacteria living within the cytoplasm of the host Phormidium sp. have been identified, including six bacteria belonging to three genera, namely Sphingomonas, Sphingopyxis, and Stenotrophobacter and while one bacteria remained unidentified due to low sequence homology in the GenBank database. The results highlighted the importance of endophytic bacteria associated with Phormidium sp. for the first time by using sequence-based identification.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENTÜRK, T., OSKAY, M. (2022). First Report of the Endophytic Bacteria Associated with Phormidium sp.. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 3, 602–608. https://ajindex.com/articles/647853

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bao, C., Jianguo, S., Xincheng, Z., Fengshan, P., Xiaoe, Y., & Ying, F. (2014).
  2. The Endophytic bacterium, Sphingomonas SaMR12, improves the potential for zinc phytoremediation by its host, Sedum alfredii. Plos One, 9, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106826
  3. Battu, L., Reddy, M. M., Goud, B. R., Ulaganathan, K., & Kandasamy, U. (2017). Genome inside genome: NGS based identification and assembly of endophytic Sphingopyxis granuli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa genomes from rice genomic reads. Genomics, 109, 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.02.002
  4. Bilal, S., Khan, A. L., Shahzad, R., Kim, Y. H., Imran, M., Khan, M. J., Harrasi, A. A., Kim, T. H., & Lee, I. J. (2018). Mechanisms of Cr(VI) resistance by endophytic Sphingomonas sp. LK11 and its Cr(VI) phytotoxic mitigating effects in soybean (Glycine max L.). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 164, 648-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.08.043
  5. Cheng, C., Wang, R., Sun, L., He, L., & Sheng, X. (2021). Cadmium-resistant and arginine decarboxylase-producing endophytic Sphingomonas sp. C40 decreases cadmium accumulation in host rice (Oryza sativa Cliangyou 513). Chemosphere, 275, 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130109
  6. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39, 783-791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
  7. Feng, F., Ge, J., Li, Y., Cheng, J., Zhong, J., & Yu, X. (2017). Isolation, colonization, and chlorpyrifos degradation mediation of the endophytic bacterium Sphingomonas strain HJY in Chinese chives (Allium tuberosum). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 65, 1131–1138. https://doi.org/ 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05283 Flewelling, J., Currie, J., Gray, C. A., & Johnson, J. A. (2015). Endophytes from marine macroalgae: promising sources of novel natural products. Current Science, 109, 88-111.
  8. Glaeser, S. P., & Kämpfer, P. (2014). The family Sphingomonadaceae. In E. Rosenberg, E. F. DeLong, S. Lory, E. Stackebrandt, & F. Thompson (Eds.), The Prokaryotes –Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria (pp. 643–707). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; Berlin. Gouda, S., Das, G., Sandeep, Sen, S. K., Shin, H. S., & Patra, J. K. (2016). Endophytes: A treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Frontiers in Microbiology, 29, 1538-1549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01538
  9. Guiry, M. D., & Guiry, G. M. (2016).
  10. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Ga