SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yükseköğretim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2

The Relationship between Academic Intellectual Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support and Organization Citizenship: A Study on the Higher Education Institutions in Turkey

Akademik Entelektüel Liderlik, Örgütsel Destek ve Örgütsel Vatandafll›k Aras›ndaki ‹liflki: Türkiye’deki Yüksekö¤retim Kurumlar›nda Bir Araflt›rma

Fatma ÖZTÜRK
Gökhan KILIÇOĞLU
Pages
409–420
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results were discussed in light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made to the practitioners, policy makers, and researchers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to test the theoretical model which hypothesizes that academics’ academic intellectual leadership affects their perceptions of per- ceived organizational support and organizational citizenship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample population of the study is composed of 731 academics working in 13 universities selected by convenience sampling from the Central Anatolia, Aegean, Black Sea and East Anatolia regions of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results were discussed in light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made to the practitioners, policy makers, and researchers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018- 2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study is to test the theoretical model which hypothesizes that academics’ academic intellectual leadership affects their perceptions of per- ceived organizational support and organizational citizenship. In line with this general purpose, it was determined whether the perceptions of academ- ics’ intellectual leadership affect their perceptions of perceived organization- al support and organizational citizenship. The causal design was used in the study. The sample population of the study is composed of 731 academics working in 13 universities selected by convenience sampling from the Central Anatolia, Aegean, Black Sea and East Anatolia regions of Turkey. The data were collected with Academic Intellectual Leadership Scale, Perceived Organizational Support Scale, and Organizational Citizenship Scale in the 2018- 2019 academic year. Mean, standard deviance, and correlation analysis were used for the analysis of the descriptive data, and path analysis was used to test the theoretical model. The findings show that academics’ academic intellec- tual leadership perceptions positively effect their perceptions of perceived organizational support (γ=.24) and organizational citizenship (γ=.38). The results were discussed in light of the relevant literature and suggestions were made to the practitioners, policy makers, and researchers.

Özet

Bu çal›flman›n amac›; ö¤retim elemanlar›n›n akademik entelektüel liderlik alg›lar›n›n, onlar›n örgütsel destek ve örgütsel vatandafll›k alg›lar›n› etkiledi- ¤i fleklinde oluflturulan teorik modeli test etmektir. Bu genel amaç do¤rul- tusunda ö¤retim elemanlar›n›n akademik entelektüel liderlik alg›lar›n›n, on- lar›n örgütsel destek ve örgütsel vatandafll›k alg›lar›n› etkileyip etkilemedi¤i s›nanm›flt›r. Çal›flma nedensel desende tasarlanm›flt›r. Araflt›rman›n örnek- lemini, ‹ç Anadolu, Ege, Karadeniz ve Do¤u Anadolu bölgelerinden kolay örnekleme ile seçilen 13 üniversitede görev yapan 731 ö¤retim eleman› oluflturmaktad›r. Araflt›rma verileri 2018–2019 e¤itim-ö¤retim y›l›nda Aka- demik Entelektüel Liderlik Ölçe¤i, Alg›lanan Örgütsel Destek Ölçe¤i ve Örgütsel Vatandafll›k Ölçe¤i kullan›larak toplanm›flt›r. Verilerin çözümlen- mesinde ortalama, standart sapma, korelasyon analizi ve modelin test edil- mesinde path analizinden yararlan›lm›flt›r. Çal›flma sonuçlar›na göre ö¤re- tim elemanlar›n›n akademik entelektüel liderlik alg›lar›, onlar›n örgütsel destek (γ=.24) ve örgütsel vatandafll›k (γ=.38) alg›lar›n› olumlu yönde etkile- mektedir. Çal›flmada sonuçlar ilgili alanyaz›n çerçevesinde tart›fl›lmaya çal›- fl›lm›fl; uygulay›c›lara, politika yap›c›lara ve araflt›rmac›lara öneriler sunul- mufltur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRK, F., KILIÇOĞLU, G. (2022). The Relationship between Academic Intellectual Leadership, Perceived Organizational Support and Organization Citizenship: A Study on the Higher Education Institutions in Turkey. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 2, 409–420. https://ajindex.com/articles/647709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Adair, J. (2004). Etkili liderlik. ‹stanbul: Bab›ali Kültür. Al-Omari, A. A. (2013). Leadership frame preference of Jordanian school principles as perceived by teachers: The Bolman and Deal four frames model. European Journal of Social Sciences, 38(2), 252–262.
  2. Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., Hair, J. F., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Developing transformational leader- ship: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14(7), 21–27.
  3. Bachrach, D. G., Wang, H., Bendoly, E., & Zhang, S. (2007). Importance of organizational citizenship behaviour for overall per- formance evaluation: Comparing the role of task interdependence in China and the USA. Management and Organization Review, 3(2), 255–276. Bakan, ‹., & Büyükbefle, T. (2004). Örgütsel iletiflim ile ifl tatmini unsurlar› aras›ndaki iliflkiler: Akademik örgütler için bir alan araflt›rmas›. Akdeniz ‹ktisadi ve idari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, 1–30.
  4. Bernardo, M. A. C., Butcher, J., & Howard, P. (2014). The leadership of engagement between university and community: Conceptualizing leadership in community engagement in higher education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 17(1), 103–122.
  5. Bolden, R., Gosling, J., & O’Brien, A. (2013). Citizens of the academic community? A societal perspective on leadership in UK higher edu- cation. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 6–28.
  6. Brierton, J., Graham, B., Tomal, D. R., & Wilhite, R. K. (2016). Ethics and politics in school leadership: Finding common ground. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  7. Chan, R. Y., & Macfarlane, B. (2014). The last judgement: Exploring intellectual leadership in higher education through academic obituar- ies. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 294–306.
  8. Coates, H., Dobson, I., Edwards, D., Friedman, T., Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, L. (2009). The attractiveness of the Australian academic profes- sion: A comparative analysis. Melbourne: LH Martin Institute. DiPaola, M. F., & Mendes Da Costa Neves, P. M. (2009). Organizational citizenship behaviors in American and Portuguese public schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(4), 490–507.
  9. DiPaola, M. F., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Measuring organi- zational citizenship of schools: The OCB scale. In W. K. Hoy, & C. G. Miskel (Eds.), Educational leadership and reform (pp. 319–341).
  10. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. Eisenberger, R., Huntington,