SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22

Export-led growth model for selected Asian countries: Panel cointegration and causality analysis

Seçilmiş Asya ülkeleri için ihracata dayalı büyüme modeli: Panel eşbütünleşme ve nedenselli kanalizi

Rüstem YANAR
Ahmet ŞAHBAZ
Hüseyin AĞIR
Pages
24–43
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In other words, the findings support the export-led growth model for 27 Asiancountries including Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this paper is to investigate the export-led growth hypothesis for non export oil 27Asian countries including Turkey by using panel cointegration and panel causality technique for theperiod 1994-2010.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the two different models, it was estimated impact of exports and gross fixedcapital formation on GDP and non-export GDP.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In other words, the findings support the export-led growth model for 27 Asiancountries including Turkey.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the export-led growth hypothesis for non export oil 27Asian countries including Turkey by using panel cointegration and panel causality technique for theperiod 1994-2010. In the two different models, it was estimated impact of exports and gross fixedcapital formation on GDP and non-export GDP. As a result, the empirical analysis impliesunidirectional causal relationship from exports and gross fixed capital formation to GDP in both shortand long-term. In other words, the findings support the export-led growth model for 27 Asiancountries including Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmada petrol ihraç etmeyen Türkiye dahil 27 Asya ülkesinde 1994-2010 yılları içinihracata dayalı büyüme modeli panel eşbütünleşme ve panel nedensellik analizleri ile testedilmektedir. İki farklı modelde hem GSYİH ve hem de ihracatı içermeyen GSYİH üzerinde ihracat vebrüt sabit sermaye yatırımlarının etkileri tahmin edilmiştir. Sonuçta, her iki modelde de kısa ve uzundönemde ihracat ve brüt sabit sermaye yatırımlarından GSYİHya doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişkisitespit edilmiştir. Başka bir ifade ile bulgular 27 Asya ülkesinde ihracata dayalı büyüme modelinidesteklemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YANAR, R., ŞAHBAZ, A., AĞIR, H. (2022). Export-led growth model for selected Asian countries: Panel cointegration and causality analysis. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22, 24–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/647615

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Abu-Quarn A.S. ve Abu-Bader, S. (2004) “The Validity of the ELG Hypothesis in the MENA Region: Cointegration and Error Correction Model Analysis”, Applied Economics, 36: 1685–1695. Ağır, H., Kar, M. ve Nazlıoğlu, Ş. (2011) “Do Remittances Matter for Financial Development in the MENA Region? Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis”, Empirical Economics Letters, 10(5): 449-456.
  2. Ağır, H. ve Utlu, S. (2011) “Ar-Ge Harcamaları ile Ekonomik Büyüme İ liş kisi: OECD Örneği Panel E ş bütünleş me ve Nedensellik Analizi”, 9. Uluslararası Bilgi Ekonomi ve Yönetim Kongresi Bildiri Kitapçığı, Saraybosna. Ahmad, J. ve Harnhirun, S. (1995) “Unit Roots and Cointegration in Estimating Causality between Exports and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from the ASEAN Countries”, Economics Letters, 49(3): 329–334. Al-Yousif, Y.K. (1997) “Exports and Economic Growth: Some Empirical Evidence from The Arab Gulf Countries”, Applied Economics, 29: 693–697. Awokuse, T.O. (2003) “Is the Export-Led Growth Hypothesis: Valid for Canada”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 36(1): 126-136.
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. ve Alse, J. (1993) “Export Growth and Economic Growth: An Application of Cointegration and Error Correction Modelling”, The Journal of Developing Areas, 27: 535–542. Bahmani-Oskooee M., Oyolola, M. (2007) “Export Growth and Output Growth: An Application of Bounds Testing Approach”, Journal of Economics and Finance, 31(1): 1–11. Bahmani-Oskooee M. ve Economidou, C. (2009) “Export-Led Growth vs. Growth-Led Exports: Ldcs Experience”, The Journal of Developing Areas, 42: 179–209. Bahmani-Oskooee M., Economidou C. ve Goswami, G.G. (2005) “Export-Led Growth Hypothesis Revisited: A Panel Cointegration Approach”, Scientific Journal of Administrative Development, 3: 40–55. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. ve Niroomand, F. (1999) “Openness and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation”, Applied Economic Letters, 6: 557–61. Bahmani-Oskooee, M., Mohtadi, H. ve Shabsigh, G. (1991) “Exports, Growth and Causalty in LDCs: A Re-examination”, Journal of Development Economics, 36, 405–415. Balassa, B. (1978) “Exports and Economic Growth: Further Evidence”, Journal of Development Economics, 5(2): 181–189. Balassa, B. (1985) “Exports, Policy Choices and Economic Growth in Developing Countries After The 1973 Oil Shock”, Journal of Development Economics, 18(1): 23–35. Bhagawati, J. N. (1982) “Directly Unproductive Profit Seeking (DUP) Activities”, Journal of Political Economy, 90, (5), 988–1002. Bilgin, C. ve Şahbaz, A