Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22

Comparative analysis of eurozone sovereign debt crisis and European exchange-rate mechanism crisis

Euro bölgesi borç krizi ile Avrupa döviz kuru mekanizması krizinin karşılaştırmalı analizi

Pages
211–231
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We find thatdifferences in development and competitiveness of economies of the member countries and theproblems in the coordination of economic policies are major causes of both crisis and the EurozoneSovereign Debt Crisis relative to the and European Exchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis caused moreeconomic contraction and more increases in the unemployment in the member countries.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Euro pean integration process has reached stage of economic and monetary union nowadays .European Union met European Exchange- Rate Mechanism crisis and the ongoing Eurozone sovereigndebt crisis during this integration process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although European Exchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis is acurrency crisis which arose from a speculative attacks to foreign exchange rates and EurozoneSovereign Debt Crisis is a debt crisis which has arisen from the negative effects of Global Financial Crisis , differences in development levels and competitiveness of member countries have significantinfluence on both crisesdeveloping.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We find thatdifferences in development and competitiveness of economies of the member countries and theproblems in the coordination of economic policies are major causes of both crisis and the EurozoneSovereign Debt Crisis relative to the and European Exchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis caused moreeconomic contraction and more increases in the unemployment in the member countries.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Euro pean integration process has reached stage of economic and monetary union nowadays .European Union met European Exchange- Rate Mechanism crisis and the ongoing Eurozone sovereigndebt crisis during this integration process. Although European Exchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis is acurrency crisis which arose from a speculative attacks to foreign exchange rates and EurozoneSovereign Debt Crisis is a debt crisis which has arisen from the negative effects of Global Financial Crisis , differences in development levels and competitiveness of member countries have significantinfluence on both crisesdeveloping. This study firstly examines historical development of Europeanintegration, European Exchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis and Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis andthen conducts a comparative analysis on the causes of Eurozone Sovereign Debt Crisis and EuropeanExchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis and effects of these crises on economies of the member countries byusing the data obtained from the Statistical Office of European Union and World Bank. We find thatdifferences in development and competitiveness of economies of the member countries and theproblems in the coordination of economic policies are major causes of both crisis and the EurozoneSovereign Debt Crisis relative to the and European Exchange- Rate Mechanism Crisis caused moreeconomic contraction and more increases in the unemployment in the member countries.

Özet

Avrupa bütünleşme süreci günümüzde ekonomik ve parasal birlik aşamasına ulaşmıştır. AvrupaBirliği bu bütünleşme sürecinde Avrupa Döviz Kuru Mekanizması Krizi ile devam etmekte olan EuroBölgesi Borç Krizi ile karşı karşıya kalmıştır. Avrupa Döviz Kuru Mekanizması Krizi döviz kurunayapılan spekülatif atak sonucu ortaya çıkan bir para krizi, Euro Bölgesi Borç Krizi ise KüreselFinansa l Krizin olumsuz etkisi sonucu ortaya çıkan bir borç krizi olmasına rağmen, üye ülkeekonomilerinin kalkınma ve rekabet düzeyleri arasındaki farklılıklar ın her iki krizin gelişimindeönemli etkisi olmuştur. Bu çalışmada öncelikli olarak Avrupanın bütünleşme sürecinin tarihselgelişimi, Avrupa Döviz Kuru Mekanizması Krizi ile Euro Bölgesi Borç Krizi üzerinde durulmuş, dahasonra Avrupa Döviz Kuru Mekanizması Krizi ile Euro Bölgesi Borç Krizinin nedenleri ile üye ülkeekonomileri üzerindeki etkileri Avrupa İstatistik Ofisi ve Dünya Bankasından sağlanan verilerkullanılarak karşılaştırmalı olarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda üye ülke ekonomilerininkalkınma ve rekabet düzeyleri arasındaki farklılıklar ile ekonomi politikalarının koordinasyonundakisorunların her iki krizin başlıca nedenleri olduğu, Euro Bölgesi Borç Krizinin, Avrupa Döviz KuruMekanizması krizine göre üye ülkeler daha fazla daralmaya ve işsizlik oranlarında daha fazlaartışlara yol açtığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAR, Y. (2022). Comparative analysis of eurozone sovereign debt crisis and European exchange-rate mechanism crisis. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 22, 211–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/647595

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bayar, Y. ve Kılıç, C. (2012) “Euro Bölgesi Borç Krizinin Türkiye Ekonomisine Olası Yansımaları Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2):53 - 70. Belkin, Paul, Mix, Derek E., Nelson, Rebecca M. ve Weiss, Martin Aç (2012) “The Eurozone Crisis: Overview and Issues for Congress ”, Congressional Research Service, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42377.pdf, (12.05.2013)
  2. Buiter, W. H., Corsetti, G. M. ve Pesenti, P. A (1998) “Interpreting the ERM Crisis: Country Specific and Systemic Issue”, Princeton Studies in International Finance, No.84. De Grauwe, P. ve Verfaille, G. (1988) “Exchange Rate Variability, Misalignment, and the European Monetary System”, Richard C. Marston (ed.) Misalignment of Exchange Rates, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  3. De Santis, R. A. (2012) “The Euro Area Sovereign Debt Crisis: Safe Haven, Credit Rating Agencies and the Spread of the Fever from Greece, Ireland and Portugal”, European Central Bank Working Papers, No. 1419. Deutsche Bundesbank, “Statistics”, http://www.bundesbank.de/Navigation/EN/Statistics/statistics.html, (16.05.2013)
  4. EUROPA (2013) “Key Dates in the History of European Integration”, http://europa.eu/abc/12lessons/ key_dates/, (14.05.2013)
  5. European Commission (2012) “What is ERM II?”, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro /adoption/erm2/index _en.htm, (15.05.2013)
  6. European Commission (2007) One Currency for one Europe: The Road to the Euro, http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication6730_en.pdf, (15.05.2013) Eurostat, “Statistics”, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/themes, (10.05.2013)
  7. Fratianni, M. (1998 ) “The European Monetary System: How Well Has It Workd?”, Cato Journal, 8(2):477- 506. Glick, R. ve Hutchison, M. (2011) “Currency Crises”, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series, Working Paper 2011 -22, http://www.frbsf.org/economic- research/files/wp11 - 22bk.pdf, (17.05.2013)
  8. Higgins, B. (1993) “Was the ERM Crisis Ineviatble”, Economic Review, 78(4), 27 - 40. Kava, T. H. ( 2005) “ERM II’de Gelecek Var mı? Türkiye Açısından Olası Senaryolar ve Politika Önerileri Nelerdir?”, Uzmanlık Yeterlilik Tezi, Ankara, Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası. Kondonassis, A. J. ve Malliaris, A. G. (1994) “Toward Monetary Union of the European Community: History and Experience of the European Monetary System”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 53(3):291 -301. Moutot, P., Rother, P., Schuknecht, L. ve Stark,