SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR VE İSTİHDAMİLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYEÖRNEĞİ

FOREIGN AFFILIATED FIRMS AND EMPLOYMENT: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Burcu FAZLIOĞLU
Başak DALGIÇ
Pages
365–374
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

JEL Classification: D22, F16, F23

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Employing a firm level dataset over the period 2003-12, employment effects of foreign affiliation is examined for Turkish firms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The employment changes of firms via foreign direct investment are investigated through treatment models by using Propensity Score Matching techniques jointly by Difference in Difference methodology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:JEL Classification: D22, F16, F23
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Employing a firm level dataset over the period 2003-12, employment effects of foreign affiliation is examined for Turkish firms. The employment changes of firms via foreign direct investment are investigated through treatment models by using Propensity Score Matching techniques jointly by Difference in Difference methodology. In an attempt to see the strength of the sustainability of fdi's positive effects on employment, the post-treatment period is extended and accordingly two different treatment groups are established. The results of the study robustly show that fdi acquisition improves firm level employment immediately after the acquisition and, this effect is sustainable even in the preceding years. JEL Classification: D22, F16, F23

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 2003-12 zaman aralığına ait firma düzeyinde bir veri seti kullanılarak, doğrudan yabancı yatırımların istihdam üzerindeki etkileri incelenmektedir. Analizlerde örneklem seçim problemini önleyecek şekilde, doğrudan yabancı yatırım alma durumunu içeren uygulama (treatment) modelleri oluşturulmakta ve bu modellere Eğilim Skoru Eşleştirmesi (Propensity Score Matching) ile birlikte Fark-içinde-Fark (Difference-in-Difference) teknikleri uygulanmaktadır. Doğrudan yabancı yatırımların firma istihdamı üzerindeki sürdürülebilir etkilerini görebilmek üzere uygulama sonrası zaman periyodu uzatılarak farklı uygulama grupları oluşturulmaktadır. Çalışmanın sonuçları, firmaların istihdam düzeyinin doğrudan yabancı yatırıma maruz kalmanın hemen ardından arttığını ve söz konusu etkinin takip eden yıllarda da sürdüğünü göstermektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

FAZLIOĞLU, B., DALGIÇ, B. (2022). DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR VE İSTİHDAMİLİŞKİSİ: TÜRKİYEÖRNEĞİ. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 365–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/647568

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aktar, I. and Öztürk, L. (2009) "Can Unemployment be Cured by Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey?", International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 27:203-11.
  2. Axarloglou, K. and Pournarakisi M. (2007) "Do All Foreign Direct Investment Inflows Benefit the Local Economy?", The World Economy, 30(3): 424-45.
  3. Aitken, B.J., and A., Harrison, E. (1990) "Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela", American Economic Review, 89(3): 605-18.
  4. Becker, S.O. and A. Ichino, A. (2002) "Estimation of Average Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores", The Stata Journal, 2(4): 358-377.
  5. Blundell, R. and Dias, M.C. (2000) "Evaluation Methods for Non-Experimental Data", Fiscal Studies, 21(4): 427-468.
  6. Brady, D. and Wallace, M. (2000) "Spatialization, Foreign Direct Investment and Labor Outcomes in the American States, 1978-1996, Social Forces", The University of North Carolina Press, 79(1), 67-99.
  7. De Loecker, J. and Konings, J. (2003) "Creative Destruction and Productivity Growth in an Emerging Economy: Evidence from Slovenian Manufacturing", LICOS Discussion Papers, 138/2003,
  8. Belgium. Dehejia, H.R. and Wahba., S. (2002) "Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non- Experimental Causal Studies", Review of Economics and Statistics, 84 (1): 151-161.
  9. Driffield N. and Taylor, K. (2000) "FDI and the Labour Market: A Review of the Evidence and Policy Implications", Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 16(3): 90-103.
  10. Ekinci, A. (2011) "Doğrudan Yabancı Yatırımlar-İstihdam İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği", Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 6(2): 71-96.
  11. Ernst, C. (2005) "The FDI employment link in a globalising world: The case of Argentina, Brasil and Mexico", Employment Strategy Papers, 2005/17, Employment Analysis Unit, Employment Strategy Department. Figini, P. and Görg, H. (1999) "Multinational Companies and Wage Inequality in the Host Country: The Case of Ireland", Economics Technical Papers, 98/16, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics. Hall, B.H. and Mairesse, J. (1995) "Exploring the Relationship Between R&D and Productivity in French Manufacturing Firms", Journal of Econometrics, 65 (1): 263-293.
  12. Hisarcıklılar, M., Gültekin-Karakaş, D. and Aşıcı A.A. (2009) "Can FDI Be A Panacea For Unemployment? The Turkish Case", Workshop on Labour Markets, Tade and FDI, Istanbul Technical University, October, İstanbul, http://www.esam.itu.edu.tr/NottinghamWorkshopPapers/Hisarciklilar-Karakas-Asici-NW.pdf. Kar