SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

A MARKOV AUTOREGRESSIVE DYNAMIC CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR WORLD EQUITY MARKETS IN CRISIS PERIOD

DÜNYA BORSALARININ KRİZ DÖNEMİNDEKİ MARKOV OTOREGRESİF NEDENSELLİK ANALİZİ

Alper ÖZÜN
Mesut TÜRKAY
Pages
1–14
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research has originality in applying Markov switching autoregression model in equity markets and also providing recent empirical evidence on causality relationships in equity markets in crisis periods

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We apply the Markov process for causality analysis proposed by Psaradakis et al. (2005) on world equity markets.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By estimating a Markov switching autoregression model, we test the existence of a dynamic causality relationship between major equity indices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research has originality in applying Markov switching autoregression model in equity markets and also providing recent empirical evidence on causality relationships in equity markets in crisis periods
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We apply the Markov process for causality analysis proposed by Psaradakis et al. (2005) on world equity markets. By estimating a Markov switching autoregression model, we test the existence of a dynamic causality relationship between major equity indices. The empirical evidence shows that the proposed dynamic model successfully captures the causality relationship in equity markets controlling for the global volatility (VIX) index in crisis periods. The research has originality in applying Markov switching autoregression model in equity markets and also providing recent empirical evidence on causality relationships in equity markets in crisis periods

Özet

Çalışmada, dünya borsaları arasındaki nedensellik Psaradakis (2005) tarafından ortaya atılan Markov süreciyle analiz edilmektedir. Markov değişim otoregresif modeli tahmin edilerek önde gelen borsalar arasındaki dinamik nedensellik ilişkisinin varlığı test edilmektedir. Ampirik bulgular önerilen dinamik modelin borsalar arasındaki ilişkiyi kriz dönemlerindeki küresel oynaklığı kontrol ederek başarılı bir şekilde gösterdiğine işaret etmektedir. Çalışma, borsalara Markov değişim otoregresif modelinin uygulanması ve kriz dönemlerinde borsalar arasındaki nedensellik ilişkisine yönelik ampirik bulgular sunması açılarından orijinallik taşımaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÜN, A., TÜRKAY, M. (2022). A MARKOV AUTOREGRESSIVE DYNAMIC CAUSALITY ANALYSIS FOR WORLD EQUITY MARKETS IN CRISIS PERIOD. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/647532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahlgren, N. and Antell, J. (2002) “Testing for Cointegration Between International Stock Prices”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 12 No. 12, pp. 851-61.
  2. Arshanapalli, B. and Doukas, J. (1993) “International Stock Market Linkages: Evidence from The PreAnd Post-October 1987 Period”, Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 193- 208. Asgharian, H., Hess, W. and Liu, L. (2013) “A Spatial Analysis of International Stock Market Linkages”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, 4738–4754.
  3. Baek, E. and Brock, W. (1992) “A General Test for Non-Linear Granger Causality: Bivariate Model”, Working Paper, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. Becker, K.G, Finnerty, J.E. and Gupta, M. (1990) “The Intertemporal Relation Between The US and Japanese Stock Markets”, Journal of Finance, 45, 1297–306.
  4. Beine, M., Capelle-Blancard, G. and Raymond, H. (2008) “International Nonlinear Causality Between Stock Markets”, The European Journal of Finance, Vol. 14, No. 8, 663–686.
  5. Bessler, D. and Yang, J. (2003) “The Structure of Interdependence In International Stock Markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 22, 261–287.
  6. Caraiani, Petre (2012) “Nonlinear Dynamics in CEE Stock Markets Indices”, Economic Letters, 114, 329–331.
  7. Claudio Morana, Andrea Beltratti (2008) “Comovements In International Stock Markets”, Int. Fin. Markets, Inst. and Money, 18 (2008), 31–45
  8. Climent, F. and Meneu, V. (2003) “Has 1997 Asian Crisis Increased Information Flows Between International Markets”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 12, 111–143.
  9. Eun, C. S. and Shim, S. (1989) “International Transmission Of Stock Market Movements”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 241-256.
  10. Francis, B. and Leachman, L. (1998) “Superexogeneity And The Dynamic Linkages Among International Equity Markets”, Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 475-492.
  11. Granger, C. W. J. (1969) Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods, Econometrica, 37 (3): 424–438 Gooijer,J. and Sivarajasingham, S. (2008) “Parametric And Nonparametric Granger Causality Testing: Linkages Between International Stock Markets”, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 387, 2547-2560
  12. Gupta, R. and Guidi, F. (2012) “Cointegration Relationship And Time Varying Co-Movements Among Indian And Asian Developed Stock Markets”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 10–22.
  13. Hamori, S. and Imamura, Y. (2000) “International Transmission of Stock Pric