Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Econometric Analysis of Foreign Capital Investment's Productivity and Contributions to Growth

Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımlarının Verimlilik ve Kalkınmaya Etkilerinin Ekonometrik İncelemesi

Pages
177–186
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Having found that KL is statistically significant, the analyze shows a positive spillover of foreign capital on labor productivity

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effects of foreign direct investments on Labor productivity and analyzes the relation between capital efficiency and labor productivity using dummy variables regression model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This investigation includes foreign-, local-, and state-owned firms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Having found that KL is statistically significant, the analyze shows a positive spillover of foreign capital on labor productivity
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of foreign direct investments on Labor productivity and analyzes the relation between capital efficiency and labor productivity using dummy variables regression model. This investigation includes foreign-, local-, and state-owned firms. In order to measure the impact of capital on total labor productivity, KL variable is employed in the model. Having found that KL is statistically significant, the analyze shows a positive spillover of foreign capital on labor productivity

Özet

Bu çalısmada, yabancı sermaye yatırımlarının verimlilik ve kalkınma üzerindeki etkileri arastırılmakta, sermaye verimliligi ve isgücü verimliligi arasındaki iliskiler gölge degiskenli regresyon teknigi kullanılarak incelenmektedir. nceleme yabancı, yerel ve devlet mülkiyetli firmalar için yapılacaktır. Sermayenin toplam isgücü verimliligi üzerinde etkisini göstermek için KL degiskeni kullanılmıstır. Yapılan analizde yabancı sermayenin etkisi pozitif dıssallıgı dogrulamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜRÜT, S., BALDEMİR, E., AYVAZ, Y. Y. (2022). Econometric Analysis of Foreign Capital Investment's Productivity and Contributions to Growth. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 177–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/647503

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AITKEN, B., HORRİSON, A., ” Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreing investment? Evidence from Venezuela.”, Am.Econ.Rev. Vol.89. 1999.
  2. ALP Ali (2000), “Finansın Uluslararasılasması”, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları ALTINTAS Mustafa (1986), “Yabancı Sermaye ve Büyüme Üzerine”, Gazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, Cilt:2, Sayı:1-2.
  3. BLOMSTROM, M., PERSSON, H., “Foreing investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped econumy: evidence from thr Mexican manufacturing industry.” World Dev., Vol. 11, 1983.
  4. BLOMSTROM, M., WOLFF, E., “ Multinational corporations and productivity convergence in Mexico.”, Oxford University Pres, Oxford, 1994.
  5. BULMUS İsmail (1994), “Mikroiktisat”, Ankara:
  6. Egitim Yayınları.
  7. CAVES, R.E.,” Multinational firms competition and productivity in host-country markets.” Economica, volume 41, 1974.
  8. COSKUN Recai (2001), “Determinants of Direct Foreign Investments in Turkey”, European Business Review, Volume:13, Number: 4. ERDAL Fuat and TATOGLU Ekrem (2002), “Locational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in an Emerging Market Economy: Evidence From Turkey”, Multinational Business Review, Volume:10, Number:1, http://www.econturk.org/Turkey2002.html,(07.03.2003).
  9. ERDEN Deniz (1996), “A Survey of Foreign Direct Investment”, İstanbul: Bogaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  10. ETKIN LAWRANCE P., HELMS MARILYN M., TÜRKKAN Ümit and GLOBERMAN, S., “Foreing direct investment and spillover effiency benefits in Canadian manufacturing industries.”, Can.j.Econ. Vol.12, 1979.
  11. GUAJARATI Domador N.(1999), “Temel Ekonometri”, Çev:Ümit Senesen, Gülay Günlük Senesen, stanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. HADDAD, M., HARRSON, A., “ Are there positive spillovers from direct foreing investment?Evidence from panel data for Morocco.” J.Dev.Econ. Vol. 42, 1993.
  12. Hazine Müstesarlıgı (2001), “Yabancı Sermaye Raporu”, www.hazine.gov.tr (12.02.2003). İstanbul Sanayi Odası, “Türkiye’nin 500 Büyük Sanayi Kurulusu 2001”, İSO Dergisi “Özel Sayı”, Sayı:437, Agustos 2002. KRMANOGLU Hasan ve ÖZÇİÇEK Ömer (1.06.1999), “The Effect of Short-Term Capital Inflow On the Turkish Economy”, Yapı Kredi Economic Review. KOKKO Ari (1994), “Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers.”, J. Dev.Econ., Vol.43. KOKKO Ari (1996), “Productivity Spillovers from Competetion Between Local Firms and Foreign Affialities”, Journal International Developments, Volume: 8. KRUGMAN Paul (2001), “Politika Taseronları ve Önemsizlesen Refah”, Çev: Nese Nur Domaniç, İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. LI Xiaoy