SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

The Moderating Role of Pelz Effect in the Relationship between Leader Power Sources and Job Satısfactıon

Liderin Güç Kaynakları ve İş Performansı Arasındaki İlişkide Pelz Etkisinin Düzenleyici Rolü

Cem Harun MEYDAN
Deniz DİRİK
İnan ERYILMAZ
Pages
75–86
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the effect of various bases of perceived leader power on employees’ contextual and task performance, and tests for the moderating role of Pelz effect in this process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pelz effect argues that the effectiveness and power of a leader to motivate employees towards organizational goal accomplishment are not independent of the leader’s power and ability to influence his superiors and to obtain strategic information.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of various bases of perceived leader power on employees’ contextual and task performance, and tests for the moderating role of Pelz effect in this process. Pelz effect argues that the effectiveness and power of a leader to motivate employees towards organizational goal accomplishment are not independent of the leader’s power and ability to influence his superiors and to obtain strategic information. In this context, the relations between a leader’s various power bases (legitimate, reward, coercive, expert-information, referent) and job performance (task and contextual) as well as the moderating role of Pelz effect in this process are investigated on sample of 195 public sector employees. According to the empirical evidence, Pelz effect moderates the relations between task performance and reward power, task performance and expert-information power, and task performance and referent power. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, liderin algılanan farklı güç kaynaklarının çalışanların görev ve bağlamsalperformansları üzerindeki etkisi ve bu süreçte Pelz etkisinin biçimleyici rolü araştırılmıştır. Pelzetkisi, liderin etkililiğinin ve çalışanları örgütsel amaç başarımlarına yöneltme gücünün liderinkendi üstlerini etkileme, kendini üstlerine dinletebilme ve onlardan stratejik bilgileri edinebilmegücünden bağımsız olarak ele alınamayacağını iddia eden bir önermedir. Bu bağlamda, liderinkullandığı farklı güç kaynakları (meşru, ödüllendirme, zorlayıcı, uzmanlık-bilgi, karizmatik) ile işperformansını oluşturan görev ve bağlamsal performans arasındaki farklılaşan ilişkiler Pelz etkisibağlamında kamu sektöründe çalışan 195 kişiden toplanan veriler ışığında sınanmış ve Pelzetkisinin, algılanan ödüllendirme gücü, uzmanlık-bilgi gücü ve karizmatik güç ile görev performansıarasındaki ilişkilerde biçimleyici rol oynadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MEYDAN, C. H., DİRİK, D., ERYILMAZ, İ. (2022). The Moderating Role of Pelz Effect in the Relationship between Leader Power Sources and Job Satısfactıon. Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 75–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/647346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Zaleznik, A. (1998). Managers and leaders: Are they different?. Harvard Business Review on Leadership, Harvard Business School Press,
  2. Boston. Yang, C., & Modell, S. (2012). Power and performance: Institutional embeddedness and performance management in a Chinese local government organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 101-132.
  3. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leadermember exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.
  4. Wang, H., Law, K.S., Hackett, R.D., Wang, D., & Chen, Z.X. (2005). Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 420-32.
  5. Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Leadership style, organizational politics, and employees’ performance an empirical examination of two competing models. Personnel Review, 36(5), 661-683.
  6. Soltani, E., & Liao, Y.Y. (2010). The application of Pelz effect to managing TQM Programmes. POMS 21st Annual Conference, 7-10 Mayıs 2010,
  7. Vancouver, Kanada. Schwarzwald, J., Koslowsky, M., & Bernstein, J. (2013). Power tactic usage by gender at work and home: past, present, and future. International Journal of Conflict Management, 24(3), 307- 324. Sargut, A. S. (2015). Kültürlerarası farklılaşma ve yönetim.Ankara,
  8. İmge Kitabevi.
  9. Raven, B.H., Schwarzwald, J., & Koslowsky, M. (1998). Conceptualising and measuring a power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 28(4), 307-332.
  10. Raven, B. H. (2001). Power/interaction and interpersonal influence: experimental investigations and case studies”, A. Y. Lee-Chai, & J. A. Bargh (Ed.), The use and abuse of power: Multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption (pp. 217-240),
  11. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
  12. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 227-251.
  13. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
  14. Pierro, A., Kruglanski, A.W., & Raven, B.H. (2012). Motivational underpinnings of social influence in work settings: Bases of social power and the need for cognitive closure. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 41-52.
  15. Pierro, A., Cicero, L., & Raven, B. H. (2008). Motivated compliance with bases of social power. Journal of App