SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Van Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

YouTube for Rapid Sequence Intubation Learning, Is It Reliable?

Hızlı Seri Entübasyon Öğrenimi için YouTube Güvenilir Bir Kaynak Mı?

Muhammed İkbal ŞAŞMAZ
Ali Haydar AKÇA
Pages
207–212
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Most of theuploaders did not elaborate recommendations of theguideline.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: We aimed to evaluate the educational videos aboutrapid sequence intubation (RSI) and their compliance withACLS-RSI guideline on the worlds biggest video-sharing site,YouTube.Methods and Methods: The search was conducted onFebruary 1, 2017 by using the terms ''rapid sequenceintubation'' and ''rapid sequence induction and intubation'' andevaluated 200 videos according to this results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All the videoswere viewed by two emergency physicians who were blindedto each other and were scored between 0 and 7 points.Results: 147 videos excluded and study group was composedof 53 videos.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Most of theuploaders did not elaborate recommendations of theguideline.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the educational videos aboutrapid sequence intubation (RSI) and their compliance withACLS-RSI guideline on the worlds biggest video-sharing site,YouTube.Methods and Methods: The search was conducted onFebruary 1, 2017 by using the terms ''rapid sequenceintubation'' and ''rapid sequence induction and intubation'' andevaluated 200 videos according to this results. All the videoswere viewed by two emergency physicians who were blindedto each other and were scored between 0 and 7 points.Results: 147 videos excluded and study group was composedof 53 videos. As total score; 17 (32.1%) videos received lessthan 3 points, 19 (35,8) videos received between 3 and 5, and17 (32.1%) of them received more than 5. The videosuploaded by an institution had higher points however it wasnot statistically significant (p=0.566).Conclusion: As a result, our study revealed that majority ofthe videos about rapid sequence intubation on YouTube arenot compliant with ACLS-RSI guideline. Most of theuploaders did not elaborate recommendations of theguideline.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, dünyanın en büyük video paylaşım sitesi olan YouTube'daki hızlı seri entübasyon videolarını değerlendirmeyi ve onların ACLS-RSI (Advanced Cardiac Life Support- Rapid Sequence Intubation) kılavuzları ile uygunluğunu değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: 1 Şubat 2017 tarihinde YouTube kaynağında ''rapid sequence intubation'' ve ''rapid sequence induction and intubation'' anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak yapılan arama sonucu bulunan 200 video çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bu videolar birbirlerinden bağımsız iki ayrı acil tıp uzmanı tarafından 0 ve 7 puan aralığında değerlendirildi. Bulgular: 147 video dışlanarak 53 video çalışma grubunu oluşturdu. Bu videolardan 17'si (%32.1) toplamda 3 ya da daha düşük puan alırken, 19'u (%35.8) 3 ve 5 arasında, 17'si (%32.1) 5 puanın üzerinde değerlendirildi. Bir kurum tarafından yüklenen videoların puanları daha yüksekti ancak bu yükseklik istatistik olarak anlamlı değildi (p=0.566). Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, YouTube kaynağındaki hızlı seri entübasyon videolarının çoğunluğu ACLS-RSI kılavuzlarına uygun değildi. Yükleyicilerin çoğu kılavuz önerilerini dikkate almamıştı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAŞMAZ, M. İ., AKÇA, A. H. (2022). YouTube for Rapid Sequence Intubation Learning, Is It Reliable?. Van Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 207–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/645994

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Brown CA 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Walls RM. Techniques, success, and adverse events of emergency department adult intubations. Ann Emerg Med 2014; 65(4): 363-370. Bernhard M et al. The First Shot Is Often the Best Shot: First-Pass Intubation Success in Emergency Airway Management. Anesth Analg 2015; 121(5): 1389-93.
  2. Walls RM, Brown CA, 3rd, Bair AE, Pallin DJ, Investigators NI. Emergency airway management: a multi-center report of 8937 emergency department intubations. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(4):347–354. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/80222- overview ACLS - Rapid Sequence Induction Updated: Mar 21, 2014. Author: James J Lamberg, DO; Chief Editor: Meda Raghavendra (Raghu), MD. Gott L, Randel G, Straker T, et al. A survey of airway training among US and Canadian anesthesiology residency programs. J Clin Anesth. 2001;23(1):15–26.
  3. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, Burke MJ, Aslam A, Giri SK, et al. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol 2015; 49(2): 189-192.
  4. Reynolds SF, Heffner J. Airway management of the critically ill patient: rapid-sequence intubation. Chest. 2005; 127(4): 1397-412.
  5. Bair AE, Filbin MR, Kulkarni RG, Walls RM. The failed intubation attempt in the emergency department: analysis of prevalence, rescue techniques, and personnel. J Emerg Med 2002; 23(2): 131-140.
  6. Sagarin MJ, Barton ED, Chng YM, Walls RM; National Emergency Airway Registry Investigators. Airway management by US and Canadian emergency medicine residents: a multicenter analysis of more than 6,000 endotracheal intubation attempts. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 46(4): 328-336. Sakles JC. Improving the Safety of Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 69(1): 7-9.
  7. Okubo M, Gibo K, Hagiwara Y, Nakayama Y, Hasegawa K; Japanese Emergency Medicine Network Investigators. The effectiveness of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) versus non-RSI in emergency department: an analysis of multicenter prospective observational study. Int J Emerg Med 2017; 10(1): 1. Şaşmaz MI, Akça AH. Reliability of trauma management videos on YouTube and their compliance with ATLS® (9th edition) guideline. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2017 Jun 1. Ho M, Stothers L, Lazare D, Tsang B, Macnab A. Evaluation of educational content of YouTube videos relating to neuro- genic bladder and intermittent catheterization. Can Urol Assoc J 2015; 9(9-10): 320- 324.