SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Increased Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Scores in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Predict More Extensive Disease in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens

Bora Özveren
Mahir Bülent Özgen
Nejdet Karşıyakalı
Alp Dinçer
Levent Türkeri
Haydar Durak
Cem Akbal
Pages
147–152
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lower tumor volume and tumor volume ratio were observed in patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 when they were compared with patients with PI-RADS scores of 4 and PI-RADS-5 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between index lesion prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version-2 score and histopathological outcomes of prostatectomy specimens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 78 male patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between August 2015 and June 2020 were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lower tumor volume and tumor volume ratio were observed in patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 when they were compared with patients with PI-RADS scores of 4 and PI-RADS-5 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the correlation between index lesion prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version-2 score and histopathological outcomes of prostatectomy specimens. Materials and Methods: A total of 78 male patients with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between August 2015 and June 2020 were included in this study. In this cohort, suspicious lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) were scored according to PI-RADS version-2 criteria. MpMRI-targeted prostate biopsy was performed for all suspicious lesions with a PI-RADS score of ≥3 followed by systematic prostate biopsy. The relationship between index lesion PI-RADS score and histopathological outcomes of prostatectomy specimens were evaluated statistically. Results: The mean age of the patients was 65.0±7.0 years. The distribution of PI-RADS scores of 3, 4, and 5 of the index lesions were 6 (7.7%), 29 (37.2%), and 43 (55.1%), respectively. Lower tumor volume and tumor volume ratio were observed in patients with a PI-RADS score of 3 when they were compared with patients with PI-RADS scores of 4 and PI-RADS-5 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Özveren, B., Özgen, M. B., Karşıyakalı, N., Dinçer, A., Türkeri, L., Durak, H., Akbal, C. (2022). Increased Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Scores in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Predict More Extensive Disease in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 147–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/645710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424
  2. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU - ESTRO - ESUR - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer 2020. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2020 Edition. Vol presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology Guidelines Office; 2020
  3. Venderink W, van Luijtelaar A, Bomers JGR, et al. Results of targeted biopsy in men with magnetic resonance imaging lesions classified equivocal, likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2018;73:353-360
  4. Choi YH, Kang MY, Sung HH, et al. Comparison of cancer detection rates between trus-guided biopsy and mri-targeted biopsy according to psa level in biopsy-naive patients: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019;17:e19-25. doi: 10.1016/j. clgc.2018.09.007
  5. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 2012;22:746-757
  6. Tewes S, Mokov N, Hartung D, et al. Standardized Reporting of Prostate MRI: Comparison of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Version 1 and Version 2. PLoS One 2016;11:e0162879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162879
  7. Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 2016;69:16-40
  8. Muller BG, Shih JH, Sankineni S, et al. Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology 2015;277:741-750
  9. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, et al. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1767-1777
  10. Mertan FV, Greer MD, Shih JH, et al. Prospective evaluation of the prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 for prostate cancer detection. J Urol 2016;196:690-696
  11. Cash H, Maxeiner A, Stephan C, et al. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. World J Urol 2016;34:525-532. 12. van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israel B, et al. Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magne