SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

TURKISH VERSION OF THE FEEDBACK ORIENTATION SCALE: INVESTIGATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES

GERİ BİLDİRİM ORYANTASYON ÖLÇEĞİ: PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Nihan ARSLAN
Aslı KARTOL
Pages
321–329
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed that the total correlated items of the scale varied between .39 and .68.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Feedback Orientation Scale.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this research is to adapt the Feedback Orientation Scale which is developed by Yang, Sin, Li, Guo and Lui (2014) to Turkish culture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed that the total correlated items of the scale varied between .39 and .68.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Feedback Orientation Scale. In the research, descriptive research method, which is one of the quantitative research methods, was used. The aim of this research is to adapt the Feedback Orientation Scale which is developed by Yang, Sin, Li, Guo and Lui (2014) to Turkish culture. The research was carried out on 219 university students. The four-dimensional model consisting of 20 items was found to be compatible in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency, item and factor analysis studies were conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the scale. As a result of reliability analysis, Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the scale was found as .90. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sample adequacy value of the scale was .89; 58% of the four-dimensional scale variance was explained. It was observed that the total correlated items of the scale varied between .39 and .68.

Özet

Araştırmanın amacı Geri Bildirim Oryantasyon Ölçeğinin psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemleri içerisinde yer alan betimsel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Bu araştırmanın amacı Yang Yang, Sin, Li, Guo ve Lui (2014) tarafından geliştirilen Geri Bildirim Oryantasyon Ölçeğini Türk kültürüne uyarlamaktır. Araştırma 219 üniversite öğrencisi üzerinde uygulanmıştır. 20 maddeden oluşan dört boyutlu model açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde uyumlu bulunmuştur. Ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini incelemek amacıyla iç tutarlılık, madde ve faktör analiz çalışmaları yürütülmüştür. Güvenilirlik analizleri sonucunda ise ölçek için Cronbach Alfa katsayısı. 90 olarak bulunmuştur. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucunda ölçeğin Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin örneklem yeterliliği değeri .89; dört boyutlu ölçek varyansının %58 sinin açıkladığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ölçeğin doğrulanmış madde toplam korelasyonlarının .39 ile .68 arasında değiştiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, N., KARTOL, A. (2022). TURKISH VERSION OF THE FEEDBACK ORIENTATION SCALE: INVESTIGATION OF PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 321–329. https://ajindex.com/articles/645286

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Bergstrom, T., Harris, A. & Karahalios, K. (2011). Encouraging initiative in the classroom with anonymous feedback. In P. Campos et al. (Eds.), 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT), pp. 527-542. September 5 – 11, Lisbon, Portugal. Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Teacher feedback in formative classroom assessment. In C. Webber & J. Lupart (Eds.), Leading student assessment, pp. 225-239. Dordrecht: Springer. Burnett, P. C. (2003). The impact of teacher feedback on student self-talk and self-concept in reading and mathematics. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 38(1), 11–16.
  2. Carpenter, L. (2018). Feedback and growth mindset: Nurturing a growth mindset through feedback with middle school students. Master Thesis, Canada: Trinity Western University. 05.01.2020 https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/med_theses/123/?utm_source=digitalcollections.dord t.edu%2Fmed_theses%2F123&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages obtained from the address. Crosby, M. E. & Ikehara, C. S. (2015). Feedback from physiological sensors in the classroom. In T. Hammond, S. Valentine, A. Adler & M. Payton (Eds.), The impact of pen and touch technology on education, pp. 381-387. Switzerland: Springer. Çepni, S. (2007). Performansların değerlendirilmesi. Ölçme ve değerlendirme (Editör: E. Karip). Ankara:
  3. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Deci, E. L.; Koestner, R. & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627. Eriksson, E.; Boistrup, L. B., & Thornberg, R. (2017). A categorisation of teacher feedback in the classroom: a field study on feedback based on routine classroom assessment in primary school. Research Papers in Education, 32(3), 316-332. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2016.1225787. Harris, L. R.; Brown, G. T. & Harnett, J. A. (2014). Understanding classroom feedback practices: A study of New Zealand student experiences, perceptions, and emotional responses. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(2), 107-133. doi: 10.1007/s11092-013-9187-5.
  4. Hattie, J. & Gan, M. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction, pp. 249-271. New York: Routledge. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487. Higgins, R.; Hartley, P. & Skelton. A. (2001). Getting th