Journals / Uluslararası İlişkiler / 2008 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 17

The Push-Pull Balance in the EU's Democratic Conditionality and its Deterioration

Avrupa Birliği'nin Demokrasi/Siyasi Şartlılığında Çekme-İtme Dengesi ve Bu Dengenin Bozulması

Pages
105–126
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This change might diminish the impact of the EU’s political conditionality in the ongoing enlargement process (Turkey, Croatia and other Western Balkan states).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:It is possible to argue that there exists a push-pull balance in the EU’s democratic conditionality that the EU has been applying since the South European states applied for membership and/or association agreement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article argue that this push-pull balance in conditionality has created the dynamics that could transform candidate states; and the best example that demonstrates the successful impact of the EU conditionality is the relation between the EU’s Eastern enlargement, the EU’s democratic conditionality and the successful transformation of political regimes in the Central and Eastern Europe.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This change might diminish the impact of the EU’s political conditionality in the ongoing enlargement process (Turkey, Croatia and other Western Balkan states).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

It is possible to argue that there exists a push-pull balance in the EU’s democratic conditionality that the EU has been applying since the South European states applied for membership and/or association agreement. This article argue that this push-pull balance in conditionality has created the dynamics that could transform candidate states; and the best example that demonstrates the successful impact of the EU conditionality is the relation between the EU’s Eastern enlargement, the EU’s democratic conditionality and the successful transformation of political regimes in the Central and Eastern Europe. However, this study puts forward that the push-pull balance of conditionality has started to deteriorate because in particular of the enlargement fatigue in the EU. This change might diminish the impact of the EU’s political conditionality in the ongoing enlargement process (Turkey, Croatia and other Western Balkan states).

Özet

AB, özellikle Güney Avrupa genişlemesinden bu yana AB’ye üyelik için başvuran aday ülkelere yönelik demokrasi şartlılığı uygulamaktadır. Buna göre, AB üyesi olabilmek için aday ülkelerin AB şartlılığını yerine getirmeleri, yani rejimlerini demokratikleştirmeleri gerekmektedir. AB bu konuda ilk ciddi sınavını Yunanistan, Portekiz ve İspanya’nın AB’ye üyelik başvurularında vermiştir. Zaman içinde AB’nin aday ülkelerin siyasi rejimlerini dönüştürmek için ciddi mekanizmalar geliştirdiği görülmektedir. Bu mekanizmanın en iyi örneklerinden biri de AB’nin Doğu genişlemesi sırasında Merkezi ve Doğu Avrupa ülkelerine uyguladığı demokratikleşme/dönüştürme politikalarıdır. Bu makale, bu demokratik şartlılık politikasının belli bir çekme-itme dengesine dayandığını iddia etmektedir. Buna göre, aday ülkelere AB üyesi olabilmeleri için şartlar ileri sürülürken bu şartları yerine getirdikleri takdirde (tam) üye olacakları açık bir şekilde ortaya konulmuştur. Bu denge aday ülkelere başarıyı da getirmiş ve ülkeler rejimlerini dönüştürmüşlerdir. Ancak, bu çalışma, bu dengenin bozulma sürecinde olduğunu iddia etmektedir. Genişleme yorgunluğu neticesinde bu denge bozulmaktadır ki önümüzdeki günlerde bu bozulma Hırvatistan, Türkiye ve Batı Balkanlar’da AB’nin dönüştürme etkisini azaltabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

USUL, A. R. (2022). The Push-Pull Balance in the EU's Democratic Conditionality and its Deterioration. Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 17, 105–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/645102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Coufoudakis, Van, “The European Economic Community and the ‘Freezing’ of the Greek Association, 1967–1974,”
  2. Journal of Common Market Studies, Cilt 16, No 2, 1977, s.114–31.
  3. Grabbe, Heather, The EU's Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan, 2006.
  4. Grabbe, Heather, “How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Con-ditionality, diffusion and diversity”, Journal of European Public Policy, Cilt 8, No 6, 2002, s. 1013–1031.
  5. Huges, James, Gwendolyn Sasse and Claire Gordon, Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality, Basingstoke, Palgarave Macmillan, 2004.
  6. Huntington, Samuel P. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
  7. Jacoby, Wade, “The reality behind the Potemkin harmonization: Priest and Penitent: The European Union as a Force in the Domestic Politics of Eastern Europe,” East European Constitutional Review, Cilt 8, No 1,2, 1999. http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol8num1-2/special/priestpen.html.
  8. Kubicek, Paul, “International Norms; the EU and Democratization: Tentative Theory and Evidence”, P. Kubicek (der.), The European Union and Demoratization, Londra, Routledge, 2003.
  9. Magone, José, “Breaking with the authoritarian past in Portugal: continues and discontinuities of international linkages and their impact on the political system”, Portuguese Journal of Social Science Cilt 3, No 3, s. 157–174.
  10. Mayhew, Alan, Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europe, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  11. Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, “EU Accession is No ‘End of History’”, Journal of Democracy, Cilt 18, No 4, 2007, s.8–16.
  12. Powell, Charles, “International Aspects of Democratization: The Case of Spain”, Laurence Whitehead (der.), The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001.
  13. Pridham, Geoffrey, “Change and Continuity in the European Union’s Political Conditionality: Aims, Approach, and Priorities”, Democratization, Cilt 14, No 3, 2007.
  14. Pridham, Geoffrey, “European Union Accession Dynamics and Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe: Past and Future Perspectives”, Government and Opposition, Cilt 41, No 3, 2006, s. 373–400.
  15. Pridham, Geoffrey, Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post Communist Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 20