Journals / Uluslararası İlişkiler / 2013 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 39

Üyeliğin belirsiz olduğu durumlarda Avrupalılaşma: Türkiye’nin enerji ve çevre politikaları

Europeanization under membership uncertainty: The cases of environmental and energy policy in Turkey

Pages
131–152
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In terms of policymaking, the EU needs to make more frequent use of policy-based intermediate rewards to encourage rule adoption where membership prospects are uncertain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article examines modalities of rule adoption from the EU’s acquis communautaire under conditions of membership uncertainty.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Drawing upon the case of Turkey, we probe into the viability of a policy-type approach (drawing upon Theodor Lowi).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In terms of policymaking, the EU needs to make more frequent use of policy-based intermediate rewards to encourage rule adoption where membership prospects are uncertain.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article examines modalities of rule adoption from the EU’s acquis communautaire under conditions of membership uncertainty. Drawing upon the case of Turkey, we probe into the viability of a policy-type approach (drawing upon Theodor Lowi). Our main contention is that the substantive design of policies (distributive or redistributive qualities) has consequential im- plications for the form (conflict-free vs. veto player constellations) and outcome (transposition likelihood) of the subsequent political process. The proposed policy-type approach, internalist in its outlook, is thus readily compatible with available Europeanization models which are ex- ternalist insofar as being premised on the study of domestic politics. In terms of policymaking, the EU needs to make more frequent use of policy-based intermediate rewards to encourage rule adoption where membership prospects are uncertain.

Özet

Bu makale yasa uyum modelitelerini AB’nin topluluk müktesebatına üyelik belirsizliği koşulları çerçevesinde incelemektedir. Türkiye örneğinden yola çıkarak, politik kategori yaklaşımının uygulanabilirliğini derinlemesine araştırmakta olup, bu makalede ileri sürdüğümüz fikir politikaların substantif bazlı dizaynının (dağılımsal ve tekrar dağılımsal özelliklerine göre) birbirini izleyen siyasi süreçlerin formasyonu (barışçıl – veto aktörleri kümeleri gibi) ve sonuç- ları (yasaların aktarma olasılığı) üzerinde önemli sonuçlara sahip olduğudur. Önerilen politik kategori yaklaşımı, içsel bir perspektif olduğundan, şimdiye kadar Avrupalılaşma çalışmalarına dışsal yaklaşım gösteren modellerle birlikte (iç politika) uyumlu olmaktadır. Dolayısıyla, AB yasalarının uyulmasını teşvik etmek için politika bazlı aracı ödüllerin kullanımına daha fazla ihtiyaç duyulduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EDİGER, Ş. V., YILDIRIM, Ç., BAYSAN, A. (2022). Üyeliğin belirsiz olduğu durumlarda Avrupalılaşma: Türkiye’nin enerji ve çevre politikaları. Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 39, 131–152. https://ajindex.com/articles/645029

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Avci, Gamze. “The Justice and Development Party and the EU: Political Pragmatism in a Changing Environment”, South European Society and Politics, Vol.16, No.3, 2011, p.409- 421. Bolukbasi, Tolga, Ebru Ertugal and Saime Ozcurumez. “The Impact of the EU on Turkey: Toward Streamlining Europeanisation as a Research Programme”, European Political Science, Vol.9, No.4, 2010, p.464-480.
  2. Böhmelt, Tobias and Tina Freyburg. “The temporal dimension of the credibility of EU conditionality and candidate states’ compliance with the acquis communautaire, 1998−2009”,
  3. European Union Politics, Vol.13, No.4, 2012, p.1-23.
  4. Börzel, Tanja and Didem Soyaltin. “Europeanization in Turkey: Stretching a Concept to its Limits?”, KFG Working Paper Series, No.36, February 2012, Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe“ Freie Universität Berlin. Börzel, Tanja and Thomas Risse. “Conceptualizing the Domestic Impact of Europe”, Kevin Featherstone and Claudio Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, p.57-82.
  5. Camyar, Isa and Halit Mustafa Tagma. “Why Does Turkey Seek European Union Membership? A Historical Institutional Approach”, Turkish Studies, Vol.11, No.3, 2010, p.371–386.
  6. Checkel, Jeffrey. “Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change”, International Organization, Vol.55, No.3, 2001, p.553-588.
  7. Collier, David. “Understanding Process Tracing”, PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol.44, No.4, 2011, p.823-830.
  8. Cook, Brian J. “Arenas of Power and New Policy Theory: Toward a Synthesis”, Paper Presentation, 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, September 2-5, 2010.
  9. Elster, Jon. “Mechanisms”, Peter Hedstrom and Richard Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 45-73. European Council. Decision 2010/787/EU on State aid to facilitate the closure of uncompetitive coal mines, Brussels, 10 December 2010. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2001/77/EC on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in internal electricity market, Brussels, 27 September 2001. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending, and subsequently repealling Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC, Brussels, 23 April 2009. European Council. Directive 84/360/EEC on the combating air pollution from industrial plants, 28 June