Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

The comparison of arthroscopic acromioplasty with and without acromioclavicular coplaning

Akromiyoklaviküler eşplanlama yapılan ve yapılmayan artroskopik akromiyoplastilerin karşılaştırılması

Pages
274–277
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therewas no statistically difference between two groups at the latest follow-up (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Coplaning means the removal of medial acromial spurs and inferior aspect of the distal clavicle.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of thestudy was to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic acromioplasty with and without coplaning in patients without acromioclavicular(AC) joint arthritis.METHODS: Because of impingement syndrome, arthroscopic subacromial decompression and acromioplasty was performed inGroup 1 (9 males/31 female).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therewas no statistically difference between two groups at the latest follow-up (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coplaning means the removal of medial acromial spurs and inferior aspect of the distal clavicle. The aim of thestudy was to evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic acromioplasty with and without coplaning in patients without acromioclavicular(AC) joint arthritis.METHODS: Because of impingement syndrome, arthroscopic subacromial decompression and acromioplasty was performed inGroup 1 (9 males/31 female). In addition, coplaning was performed in Group 2 (8 males/21 females) by two different surgeons. Themean age was 48 in Group 1, 46 in Group 2. The mean follow-up was 50 months and 44 months, respectively.RESULTS: Constant score, cross-body adduction test and AC joint tenderness was used for follow-up. The mean preoperativeConstant scores were 45 points (range: 34–76 points) in Group 1, 39 points (range: 32–69 points) in Group 2. The mean Constantscores at the latest follow-up was 78 points (range: 68–100 points) for Group 1, 84 points (range: 72–100 points) for Group 2. Therewas no statistically difference between two groups at the latest follow-up (p

Özet

AMAÇ: Eşplanlama medial akromiyal spurların ve distal klavikulanın alt kısmının çıkarılması demektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, akromiyoklaviküler artrit olmayan hastalarda, eşplanlama uygulanan ve uygulanmayan artroskopik akromiyoplasti tedavisi yapılan hastaların değerlendirilmesidir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Sıkışma sendromu nedeniyle, Grup 1’deki hastalara (9 erkek/31 kadın) artroskopik subakromiyal dekompresyon ve akromiyoplasti uygulandı. Aynı endikasyon ile Grup 2’deki hastalara (8 erkek/21 kadın) Grup 1’deki tedaviye ilave olarak eşplanlama uygulandı. Ortalama yaş, Grup 1’de 48, Grup 2’de 46 idi. Ortalama takip süresi sırasıyla 50 ay ve 44 ay idi. BULGULAR: Takipte Constant skoru, çapraz addüksiyon testi ve akromiyoklaviküler hassasiyet kullanıldı. Ortalama ameliyat öncesi Constant skoru Grup 1’de 45 (aralık: 34–76), Grup 2’de 39 (aralık: 32–69) olarak bulundu. En son takipte ortalama Constant skorları Grup 1 için 78 (aralık: 68–100 puan), Grup 2 için 84 (aralık: 72–100 puan) olarak bulundu. En son takipte iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDIN, N., KOCAOĞLU, B., SARIOĞLU, E., TOK, O., GÜVEN, O. (2022). The comparison of arthroscopic acromioplasty with and without acromioclavicular coplaning. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 274–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/644393

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54:41–50. [CrossRef ] Papadonikolakis A, McKenna M, Warme W, Martin BI, Matsen FA 3rd. Published evidence relevant to the diagnosis of impingement syndrome of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1827–32. [CrossRef ] Mauro CS, Jordan SS, Irrgang JJ, Harner CD. Practice patterns for subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair: an analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery database. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1492–9. [CrossRef ] Kim J, Chung J, Ok H. Asymptomatic acromioclavicular joint arthritis in arthroscopic rotator cuff tendon repair: a prospective randomized comparison study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011;131:363–9. [CrossRef ] Chen AL, Rokito AS, Zuckerman JD. The role of the acromioclavicular joint in impingement syndrome. Clin Sports Med 2003;22:343–57.
  2. Altchek DW, Carson EW. Arthroscopic acromioplasty: indications and technique. Instr Course Lect 1998;47:21–8.
  3. Caspari RB, Thal R. A technique for arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy 1992;8:23–30. [CrossRef ] Ellman H. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one- to three-year results. Arthroscopy 1987;3:173–81. [CrossRef ] Ellman H, Kay SP. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for chronic impingement. Two- to five-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:395–8. [CrossRef ] Blazar PE, Iannotti JP, Williams GR. Anteroposterior instability of the distal clavicle after distal clavicle resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998:114–20. [CrossRef ] Edwards SG. Acromioclavicular stability: a biomechanical comparison of acromioplasty to acromioplasty with coplaning of the distal clavicle. Arthroscopy 2003;19:1079–84. [CrossRef ] Petersson CJ, Gentz CF. Ruptures of the supraspinatus tendon. The significance of distally pointing acromioclavicular osteophytes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983:143–8.
  4. Klintberg IH, Svantesson U, Karlsson J. Long-term patient satisfaction and functional outcome 8-11 years after subacromial decompression. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2010;18:394–403. [CrossRef ] Barber FA. Long-term results of acromioclavicular joint coplaning. Arthroscopy 2006;22:125–9. [CrossRef ] Fischer BW, Gross RM, McCarthy JA, Arroyo JS. Incidence of acromioclavicular joint complications after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Arthroscopy 1999;15:241–8. [CrossRef ] Hazel RM, Tasto JP, Klassen J. Arthroscopic subacro