Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Antivenom use in bite and sting cases presenting to a public hospital

Bir devlet hastanesine başvuran ısırma ve sokma olgularında antivenom kullanımı

Pages
343–350
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, antivenom use was found to be significantly high in patients with scorpion sting and snake bite despite theabsence of systemic or local indications (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: To evaluate the distribution of bite and sting cases presenting to a district public hospital and the use of antivenom in scorpion sting and snake bite cases.METHODS: The demographic characteristics of patients with bites/stings reporting to a public hospital in 2014, the agent involved, the season of reporting, severity of clinical findings during presentation, and use of antivenom in scorpion sting and snake bite cases were evaluated retrospectively. χ2 test was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Bite and sting cases comprised 0.5% of all the patients reporting to the hospital’s emergency department, with scorpion sting cases comprising almost half (54.2%) of these hospital presentations, followed by Hymenoptera (bee and wasp) sting (30.8%) and snake bite (5.5%) cases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Unnecessary antihistamine administration was found to be significantly high in asymptomatic patients (p=0.00006).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, antivenom use was found to be significantly high in patients with scorpion sting and snake bite despite theabsence of systemic or local indications (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the distribution of bite and sting cases presenting to a district public hospital and the use of antivenom in scorpion sting and snake bite cases.METHODS: The demographic characteristics of patients with bites/stings reporting to a public hospital in 2014, the agent involved, the season of reporting, severity of clinical findings during presentation, and use of antivenom in scorpion sting and snake bite cases were evaluated retrospectively. χ2 test was used for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Bite and sting cases comprised 0.5% of all the patients reporting to the hospital’s emergency department, with scorpion sting cases comprising almost half (54.2%) of these hospital presentations, followed by Hymenoptera (bee and wasp) sting (30.8%) and snake bite (5.5%) cases. Unnecessary antihistamine administration was found to be significantly high in asymptomatic patients (p=0.00006). Furthermore, antivenom use was found to be significantly high in patients with scorpion sting and snake bite despite theabsence of systemic or local indications (p

Özet

AMAÇ: Bir ilçe devlet hastanesine başvuran ısırma ve sokma olgularının dağılımı ve akrep sokmalarında ve yılan ısırmalarında antivenom kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Devlet hastanesine 2014 yılı içerisinde bildirilen ısırma-sokma olgularının demografik özellikleri, ısırma sokma etkeni, mevsim, başvuru sırasında klinik bulguların ciddiyeti, akrep sokmalarında ve yılan ısırmalarında antivenom kullanımı geriye yönelik olarak değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analizde ki-kare testi kullanıldı. BULGULAR: Tüm olgular arasında, ısırma ve sokmaların oranı %0.5 idi. Akrep sokma olguları, hastane başvuruların yarısından fazlasını (%54.2) oluştururken, akrep sokmalarını, arı sokmaları (%30.8) ve yılan ısırmaları (%5.5) izliyordu. Semptomsuz hastalarda, gereksiz antihistaminik uygulaması istatistiksel olarak anlamlı oranda yüksekti (p=0.00006). Akrep sokmalarında ve yılan ısırmalarında, sistemik ya da lokal endikasyon olmamasına rağmen antivenom kullanımı anlamlı oranda yüksekti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARICI, M. A., HOCAOĞLU, N., TUNÇOK, Y., KALKAN, Ş., ŞAHİN, A. (2022). Antivenom use in bite and sting cases presenting to a public hospital. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 343–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/644373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Köse R. The management of snake envenomation: evaluation of twentyone snake bite cases. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2007;13:307–12.
  2. Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Zimmerman A, Schauben JL. 2015 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 33rd Annual Report. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2016;54:924–1109. [CrossRef ] Özcan N, İkincioğulları D. Ulusal Zehir Danışma Merkezi. 2008 yılı çalışma raporu özeti. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyo- loji Dergisi 2009;66:29–58.
  3. Yıldıztepe E, Aksay N H, Demir Ö, Arıcı A, Oransay K, Evcim S, Kalkan Ş, Tunçok Y. Analysis of the Year 2007 Data of Dokuz Eylül University Drug and Poison Information Center, Turkey. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010;30:1622–30. [CrossRef ] Ertem K, Esenkaya I, Kaygusuz MA, Turan C. Our clinical experience in the treatment of snakebites. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2005;39:54–8. Goddard J. Physician’s Guide to Arthropods of Medical Importance. 6th ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press; 2012. [CrossRef ] Goldfrank L, Flomenbaum N, Lewin N, Howland MA,Hoffman R, Nelson L, editors. Goldfrank’s Toxicologic Emergencies, tenth edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY; 2013.
  4. Warrell DA, Cox TM, Firth JD, editors. Oxford Textbook of Medicine, Vol 2, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003:1202–8. Warrell DA. Venomous bites, stings, and poisoning. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2012;26:207–23. [CrossRef ] de Silva HA, Ryan NM, de Silva HJ. Adverse reactions to snake antivenom, and their prevention and treatment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016;81:446–52. [CrossRef ] Casey PB, Dexter EM, Michell J, Vale JA. The prospective value of the IPCS/EC/EAPCCT poisoning severity score in cases of poisoning. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 1998;36:215–7. [CrossRef ] Chippaux JP. Emerging options for the management of scorpion stings. Drug Des Devel Ther 2012;6:165–73. [CrossRef ] Warrell DA. Guidelines for the management of snake-bites. Guidelines for the management of snake-bites. WHO Regional Office for SouthEast Asia: 2010. Available at: http://apps.searo.who.int/PDS_DOCS/ B4508.pdf, Accessed 16.04.2018.
  5. Tang N, Stein J, Hsia RY, Maselli JH, Gonzales R. Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007. JAMA 2010;304:664–70. [CrossRef ] O’Neil ME, Mack KA, Gilchrist J. Epidemiology of non-canine bite and sting injuries treated in U.S. emergency departments, 2001-2004. Public Health Rep 2007;122:764–75. [CrossRef ] Arici A, S. Hocaoglu, N. Tuncok Y. Bites and stings re