Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Hyalobarrier gel and Seprafilm in preventing peritendinous adhesions following crush-type injury in a rat model

Sıçan modelinde ezilme tipi yaralanma sonrasında gelişen tendon yapışıklıklarının önlenmesinde Hyalobarrier Gel ve Seprafilm’in etkinliği

Pages
93–98
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no statistically significant difference between Group 2 and the control group (p=0.737).Groups 3, 4, and 5 demonstrated fewer adhesions than Groups 1 and 2 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: In the present study, the aim was to evaluate the effects of Hyalobarrier gel (Anika Therapeutics S.r.l., Abano Terme,Italy) and Seprafilm adhesion barrier (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA) in the prevention of peritendinous adhesions following a crush-type injury.METHODS: Twenty five female Wistar Albino rats, weighing 230 to 270 g and 7 to 9 months of age were randomized into 5 groups.Group 1 was the control group, Group 2 comprised the Hyalobarrier gel group, Group 3 was made up of the Seprafilm-treatedsubjects, Group 4 was the tendon repair and Hyalobarrier gel group, and Group 5 was the tendon repair and Seprafilm group.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Twogastrocnemius muscle tendons of each animal, a total of 50 tendons, were used.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no statistically significant difference between Group 2 and the control group (p=0.737).Groups 3, 4, and 5 demonstrated fewer adhesions than Groups 1 and 2 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the present study, the aim was to evaluate the effects of Hyalobarrier gel (Anika Therapeutics S.r.l., Abano Terme,Italy) and Seprafilm adhesion barrier (Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA, USA) in the prevention of peritendinous adhesions following a crush-type injury.METHODS: Twenty five female Wistar Albino rats, weighing 230 to 270 g and 7 to 9 months of age were randomized into 5 groups.Group 1 was the control group, Group 2 comprised the Hyalobarrier gel group, Group 3 was made up of the Seprafilm-treatedsubjects, Group 4 was the tendon repair and Hyalobarrier gel group, and Group 5 was the tendon repair and Seprafilm group. Twogastrocnemius muscle tendons of each animal, a total of 50 tendons, were used. The animals were sacrificed with the administrationof a high dose of anesthetic on postoperative day 40. Macroscopic evaluation of adhesions was classified by 2 blinded researchersaccording to Tang’s adhesion grading system. The number of fibroblasts and the density and formation of collagen fibers were notedfor histopathological examination.RESULTS: None of the subjects in Group 2 was determined to have a severe adhesion, and moderate or severe adhesions weredetected in Groups 3, 4, and 5. There was no statistically significant difference between Group 2 and the control group (p=0.737).Groups 3, 4, and 5 demonstrated fewer adhesions than Groups 1 and 2 (p

Özet

AMAÇ: Çalışmamızda Hyalobarrier Gel ve Seprafilm’in ezilme tipi yaralanma sonrasında tendon yapışıklıklarının önlenmesi üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Yirmi beş adet 230–270 gram aralığında ve yedi–dokuz aylık dişi sıçanlar beş grup olarak randomize edildi. Grup 1: Kontrol grubu, Grup 2: Hyalobarrier Gel grubu, Grup 3: Seprafilm grubu, Grup 4: Tendon onarımı ve Hyalobarrier Gel grubu, Grup 5: Tendon onarımı ve Seprafilm grubu olarak adlandırıldı. Her deney hayvanının iki gastroknemius kası tendonu olmak üzere toplamda 50 tendon kullanıldı. Deney hayvanları yüksek doz anestezi uygulamasıyla operasyon sonrası 40. günde sakrifiye edildiler. Yapışıklıkların makroskopik değerlendirilmesi iki kör araştırmacı tarafından Tang’ın yapışıklık dereceleme sistemiyle sınıflandırıldı. Histopatolojik değerlendirme için fibroblast sayıları, kollajen yoğunluğu ve yapısı değerlendirmeye alındı. BULGULAR: Grup 2’de ciddi yapışıklık saptanmadı; Grup 3, 4 ve 5’te orta ve ciddi yapışıklık saptanmadı. Grup 2 ve kontrol grubu arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p=0.737). Grup 3, 4 ve 5; Grup 1 ve 2’den daha az yapışıklığa sahipti (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Sıkar, E. Y., Top, H., Aygıt, A. C., Sıkar, H. E. (2022). Effects of Hyalobarrier gel and Seprafilm in preventing peritendinous adhesions following crush-type injury in a rat model. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 2, 93–98. https://ajindex.com/articles/644328

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Gelberman RH, Vande Berg JS, Lundborg GN, Akeson WH. Flexor tendon healing and restoration of the gliding surface. An ultrastructural study in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983
  2. 70–80. [CrossRef ] 2. Manske PR. Flexor tendon healing. J Hand Surg Br 1988
  3. 237–45. 3. Chow JA, Thomes LJ, Dovelle S, Milnor WH, Seyfer AE, Smith AC. A combined regimen of controlled motion following flexor tendon repair in “no man’s land”. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987
  4. 447–55. [CrossRef ] 4. Yilmaz E, Avci M, Bulut M, Kelestimur H, Karakurt L, Ozercan I. The effect of seprafilm on adhesion formation and tendon healing after flexor tendon repair in chicken. Orthopedics 2010
  5. 164–70. [CrossRef ] 5. Menderes A, Mola F, Tayfur V, Vayvada H, Barutçu A. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions following flexor tendon injury with seprafilm. Ann Plast Surg 2004
  6. 560–4. [CrossRef ] 6. Karakurum G, Buyukbebeci O, Kalender M, Gulec A. Seprafilm interposition for preventing adhesion formation after tenolysis. An experimental study on the chicken flexor tendons. J Surg Res 2003
  7. 195–200. 7. Liu Y, Skardal A, Shu XZ, Prestwich GD. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions using a hyaluronan-derived hydrogel film following partialthickness flexor tendon injury. J Orthop Res 2008
  8. 562–9. [CrossRef ] 8. Işik S, Oztürk S, Gürses S, Yetmez M, Güler MM, Selmanpakoğlu N, et al. Prevention of restrictive adhesions in primary tendon repair by HA membrane: experimental research in chickens. Br J Plast Surg 1999
  9. 373–9. [CrossRef ] 9. Kulick MI, Smith S, Hadler K. Oral ibuprofen: evaluation of its effect on peritendinous adhesions and the breaking strength of a tenorrhaphy. J Hand Surg Am 1986
  10. 110–20. [CrossRef ] 10. Kapetanos G. The effect of the local corticosteroids on the healing and biomechanical properties of the partially injured tendon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982
  11. 170–9. [CrossRef ] 11. Stark HH, Boyes JH, Johnson L, Ashworth CR. The use of paratenon, polyethylene film, or silastic sheeting to prevent restricting adhesions to tendons in the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977
  12. 908–13. [CrossRef ] 12. Ketchum LD. Effects of triamcinolone on tendon healing and function. A laboratory study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1971
  13. 471–82. [CrossRef ] 13. Dabak TK, Sertkaya O, Acar N, Donmez BO, Ustunel I. The Effect of Phospholipids (Surfactant) on Adhesion and Biomechanical Properties of Tendon: A Rat Achilles Tendon Repair Model. Biomed Res Int 2015
  14. 689314. [CrossRef ] 14. Li J, Feng X, Liu B, Yu Y