Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Effects of different anesthesia techniques onintraoperative blood loss in acetabular fracturesundergoing the Modified Stoppa approach

Modifiye Stoppa yaklaşımı ile ameliyat edilen asetabulum kırıklarında farklıanestezi tekniklerinin intraoperatif kan kaybı üzerine etkisi

Pages
445–452
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean intraoper-ative blood losses were 717.27 ml (300–1.600 ml) in the GA group and 473.81 ml (150–1.020 ml) in the CEGA group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND:This study aims to evaluate the effects of the anesthesia technique on the intraoperative blood loss in acetabular fracture patients undergoing the Modified Stoppa approach.METHODS:We retrospectively identified 63 patients who underwent a Modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture from January 2014 to July 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 20 patients were excluded from this study for the following reasons: bilateral acetabular fractures (n=6), undergoing antiaggregant treatment (n=3), incomplete anesthesia records (n=3), emergency pelvic surgery due to hemodynamic insta-bility (n=5), splenic rupture (n=2), and liver laceration (n=1).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean intraoper-ative blood losses were 717.27 ml (300–1.600 ml) in the GA group and 473.81 ml (150–1.020 ml) in the CEGA group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND:This study aims to evaluate the effects of the anesthesia technique on the intraoperative blood loss in acetabular fracture patients undergoing the Modified Stoppa approach.METHODS:We retrospectively identified 63 patients who underwent a Modified Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture from January 2014 to July 2018. A total of 20 patients were excluded from this study for the following reasons: bilateral acetabular fractures (n=6), undergoing antiaggregant treatment (n=3), incomplete anesthesia records (n=3), emergency pelvic surgery due to hemodynamic insta-bility (n=5), splenic rupture (n=2), and liver laceration (n=1). The patients were divided into two groups as follows: patients undergoing general anesthesia (GA) (n=22) and patients undergoing combined epidural-general anesthesia (CEGA) (n=21). The main outcome measurements studied were the intraoperative blood loss and the need for intraoperative and/or postoperative blood transfusions.RESULTS:No statistically significant differences were found between the groups concerning the age, gender, type of fracture, mech-anism of injury, time from injury to surgery, Injury Severity Score, associated injuries, and comorbidities (p>0.05). The mean intraoper-ative blood losses were 717.27 ml (300–1.600 ml) in the GA group and 473.81 ml (150–1.020 ml) in the CEGA group (p

Özet

AMAÇ: Asetabulum kırığı nedeniyle Modifiye Stoppa yaklaşımı ile ameliyat edilen hastalardaki intraoperatif kanama miktarına, anestezi tekniğinin etkisini değerlendirmektir.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Ocak 2014 ve Temmuz 2018 tarihleri arasında asetabulum kırığı nedeniyle Modifiye Stoppa yaklaşımı ile ameliyat edilen 63 hasta geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. İki taraflı asetabulum kırığı (n=6), antiagregan tedavisi (n=3), anestezi kayıtlarında eksiklik (n=3), hemodinamik instabilite nedeniyle acil pelvik cerrahi geçirmiş (n=5), dalak yırtığı (n=2) ve karaciğer yırtığı (n=1) olan, toplam 20 hasta çalışmadan dışlandı. Hastalar genel anestezi yapılanlar (GA) (n=22) ve kombine epidural-genel anestezi yapılanlar (CEGA) (n=21) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrıldı. İntraoperatif kanama miktarı ve intraoperatif ve/veya ameliyat sonrası kan transfüzyon ihtiyacı, değerlendirilen ana ölçüm parametreleriydi.BULGULAR: Gruplar arasında yaş, cinsiyet, kırık tipi, yaralanma mekanizması, yaralanma ile cerrahi arasındaki süre, yaralanma şiddet skoru, eşlik eden yaralanmalar ve komorbiditeler açısından istatistiksel anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Ortalama intraoperatifkanama miktarı GA grubunda 717.27 ml (300–1.600 ml) ve CEGA grubunda 473.81 ml (150–1.020 ml) bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

UYSAL, A. İ., ALTIPARMAK, B., AYDOĞAN, N. H., KILINÇ, C. Y., AÇAN, A. E., GÜLTAÇ, E. (2022). Effects of different anesthesia techniques onintraoperative blood loss in acetabular fracturesundergoing the Modified Stoppa approach. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 445–452. https://ajindex.com/articles/644214

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Strauss JE, O’Toole RV, Pollak AN. Does supplemental epidural anesthesia improve outcomes of acetabular fracture surgery?. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:67–72
  2. Davis FM, Laurenson VG, Gillespie WJ, Wells JE, Foate J, Newman E. Deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. A comparison between spinal and general anaesthesia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989;71:181–5
  3. Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaestg 2000;84:450–5
  4. Dauphin A, Raymer KE, Stanton EB, Fuller HD. Comparison of general anesthesia with and without lumbar epidural for total hip arthroplasty: effects of epidural block on hip arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth 1997;9:200– 3
  5. Freeman AK, Thorne CJ, Gaston CL, Shellard R, Neal T, Parry MC, et al. Hypotensive Epidural Anesthesia Reduces Blood Loss in Pelvic and Sacral Bone Tumor Resections. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:634−40
  6. Choi PT, Bhandari M, Scott J, Douketis J. Epidural analgesia for pain relief following hip or knee replacement. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;3:CD003071
  7. Kita T, Maki N, Song YS, Arai F, Nakai T. Caudal epidural anesthesia administered intraoperatively provides for effective postoperative analgesia after total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Anesth 2007;19:204–8
  8. Pellegrini VD Jr, Sharrock NE, Paiement GD, Morris R, Warwick DJ. Venous thromboembolic disease after total hip and knee arthroplasty: current perspectives in a regulated environment. Instr Course Lect 2008;57:637–61
  9. Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1993
  10. Hirvensalo E, Lindahl J, Kiljunen V. Modified and new approaches for pelvic and acetabular surgery. Injury 2007;38:431–41
  11. Klein HG. Allogeneic transfusion risks in the surgical patient. Am J Surg 1995;170:21S–6S
  12. Transfusion alert: use of autologous blood. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Expert Panel on the use of Autologous Blood. Transfusion 1995;35:703–11
  13. Dodd RY. Current estimates of transfusion safety worldwide. Dev Biol (Basel) 2005;120:3–10
  14. Bierbaum BE, Callaghan JJ, Galante JO, Rubash HE, Tooms RE, Welch RB. An analysis of blood management in patients having a total hip or knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:2–10
  15. Isaacson MJ, Taylor BC, French BG, Poka A. Treatment of acetabulum fractures through the modified Stoppa approach: strategies and outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:3345–52