Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 34

HERD BEHAVIOR IN BANK LENDING:EVIDENCE FROM PARTICIPATION BANKS IN TURKEY

BANKA FİNANSMANINDA SÜRÜ DAVRANIŞI:TÜRKİYE’DE KATILIM BANKALARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Pages
117–128
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consistently, banks do not prefer to herd in their lending decisions to industries which small sized businesses mostly operate in due to the fact that gathering information is much more difficult.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper aims to examine participation banks’ herd behavior in their lending decisions in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Herding was analyzed by using the Lakonishock, Shleifer and Vishny (LSV) and Frey, Herbst and Walter (FHW) herding measures during the period from 2010 to 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consistently, banks do not prefer to herd in their lending decisions to industries which small sized businesses mostly operate in due to the fact that gathering information is much more difficult.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper aims to examine participation banks’ herd behavior in their lending decisions in Turkey. Herding was analyzed by using the Lakonishock, Shleifer and Vishny (LSV) and Frey, Herbst and Walter (FHW) herding measures during the period from 2010 to 2020. The study allows to calculate the LSV and FHW measures for loans outstanding to eight different industries, as well. The results provided an evidence of significant herding in participation banks’ lending decisions during the entire sample. On the other hand, banks’ lending decisions tend to be affected more, in particular, during fluctuations in the market. Wholesale trade&brokerage and construction industries are dominant borrowers under these uncertain conditions. Consistently, banks do not prefer to herd in their lending decisions to industries which small sized businesses mostly operate in due to the fact that gathering information is much more difficult.

Özet

Bu çalışma Türkiye’de katılım bankalarının finansman kararlarındaki sürü davranışlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sürü davranışı, 2010-2020 dönemleri arasında Lakonishock, Shleifer ve Vishny (LSV) ve Frey, Herbst ve Walter (FHW) ölçümleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte, bu çalışma sekiz farklı sektöre verilen finansman için LSV ve FHW değerlerinin hesaplanmasına olanak sağlamaktadır. Sonuçlar, katılım bankalarının finansman kararlarında sürü davranışında bulunduklarını göstermektedir. Öte yandan, bankalar, özellikle piyasadaki dalgalanmalar sırasında daha fazla finansman desteği verme eğilimindedirler. Bu belirsiz koşullar altında toptan ticaret ve komisyonculuk ile inşaat sektörleri piyasayı domine eden sektörler arasında yer almaktadır. Aynı zamanda, bankalar bilgiye ulaşmanın daha zor olması sebebiyle, çoğunlukla küçük işletmelerin faaliyet gösterdikleri sektörlere finansman desteği verirken sürü davranışında bulunmayı tercih etmemektedirler.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, H. H. (2022). HERD BEHAVIOR IN BANK LENDING:EVIDENCE FROM PARTICIPATION BANKS IN TURKEY. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 34, 117–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/644078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797-817.
  2. Bellando, R. (2010). Measuring Herding Intensity: A Hard Task. Document de recherche du LEO 2010-13 (Université d'Orléans), available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1622700
  3. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D. and Welch, I. (1992).
  4. A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992- 1026. Bikhchandani, S., and Sharma, S. (2000). Herd Behavior in Financial Markets: A Review. IMF Working Paper, 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.228343.
  5. Bikhchandani, S., and Sharma, S. (2001). Herd Behavior in Financial Markets. IMF Staff Papers, 47(3), 279-310.
  6. Blasco, N., Corredor, P. and Ferreruela, S. (2009).
  7. Herding, Volatility and Market Stress. Working Paper, 1-21.
  8. Chang, E.C., Cheng, J.W. and Khorana, A. (2000). An Examination of Herd Behavior in Equity Markets: An International Perspective. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24(10), 1651- 1679. Choe, H., Kho, B. C., and Stulz, R. M. (1999). Do Foreign Investors Destabilize Stock Markets? The Korean Experience in 1997. Journal of Financial Economics, 54, 227-264.
  9. Christie, W.G. and Huang, R.D. (1995). Following the Pied Piper: Do Individual Returns Herd around the Market. Financial Analysts Journal, 51(4), 31-37.
  10. Coban, A.T. (2009). İMKB’de Sürü Davranışının Test Edilmesi. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Cukurova University Institute of Social Sciences, Adana. DeLong, J.B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L.H. and Waldmann, R.J. (1990). Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703-738.
  11. Döm, S. (2003).Yatırımcı Psikolojisi İMKB Üzerine Ampirik Bir Çalışma. Değişim Yayınları.
  12. İstanbul.
  13. Durukan, M. B., Özsu, H. H., and Can Ergün, Z. (2017).Financial Crisis and Herd Behavior: Evidence from the Borsa Istanbul. In F. Economou, K. Gavriilidis, G. N. Gregoriou & V. Kallinterakis (Eds.), Handbook of Investors’ Behavior during Financial Crises (pp. 203-217).
  14. Erdogan, H. H. (2021a). Beta Herding in the Covid-19 Era: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business and Economics Research Journal, 12(2), 359-368.
  15. Erdogan, H. H. (2021b). Herd Behavior: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Nika Yayınevi.
  16. Ankara.
  17. Frey, S., Herbst, P., and Walter, A. (2007). Measuring Mutual Fund Herding - A Structural Approach. Unpublished Working Paper. Frömmel, M. (2013). Portfolios and Investments. Books on Demand. Germany. Gavriilidis, K., Kallinterakis, V.