Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

Volar-locking plate versus external fixator in the management of distal radius fractures: An isokinetic study

Pages
1156–1163
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS: The DASH scores, grip strength, and palmar flexion were better in VLP group at the 6 months (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and isokinetic evaluation of distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixator.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The study included fifty patients with distal radius fracture type C1/C2/C3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS: The DASH scores, grip strength, and palmar flexion were better in VLP group at the 6 months (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and isokinetic evaluation of distal radius fractures treated by volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixator. METHODS: The study included fifty patients with distal radius fracture type C1/C2/C3. Twenty-seven patients (12 men, 15 women; mean age 49.5±4.42) underwent open reduction and VLP fixation, and 23 patients (10 men, 13 women; 52.1±4.6) underwent closed reduction and external fixation. The follow-up period was at least 12 months and the mean following time was 13.5±1.02 (12–15) months. The functional parameters measured were range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Radiographic parameters (radial incli- nation, palmar tilt, and radial height) and isokinetic evaluation were measured at the 6 months and at the final follow-up after surgery. The isokinetic test was done at the speed of 60º/s. The non-fractured arm was tested first and all results were also expressed as a percentage of that on the normal side. Wrist scores according to the disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire were used. RESULTS: The DASH scores, grip strength, and palmar flexion were better in VLP group at the 6 months (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Dündar, A., Çankaya, D., Karakuş, D., Tabak, A. Y. (2022). Volar-locking plate versus external fixator in the management of distal radius fractures: An isokinetic study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1156–1163. https://ajindex.com/articles/644066

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Luo P, Lou J, Yang S. Pain management during rehabilitation after distal radius fracture stabilized with volar locking plate: A prospective cohort study. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:5786089
  2. Egol K, Walsh M, Tejwani N, McLaurin T, Wynn C, Paksima N. Bridg- ing external fixation and supplementary Kirschner-wire fixation versus volar locked plating for unstable fractures of the distal radius: A ran- domised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:1214−21
  3. Szekeres M, MacDermid JC, Grewal R, Birmingham T. The short-term effects of hot packs vs therapeutic whirlpool on active wrist range of mo- tion for patients with distal radius fracture: A randomized controlled tri- al. J Hand Ther 2018;31:276−81
  4. Kreder HJ, Hanel DP, Agel J, McKee M, Schemitsch EH, Trumble TE, et al. Indirect reduction and percutaneous fi xation versus open reduction and internal fixation for displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:829−36
  5. Westphal T, Piatek S, Schubert S, Winckler S. Outcome after surgery of distal radial fractures: No differences between external fixation and ORIF. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005;125:507−14
  6. Walenkamp MM, Bentohami A, Beerekamp MS, Peters RW, Van der Heiden R, Goslings JC, et al. Functional outcomein patients with unsta- ble distal radius fractures, volarlocking plate versus external fixation: A meta-analysis. StrategiesTrauma Limb Reconstr 2013;8:67−75
  7. Verdano MA, Baudi P, Pellegrini A, Lunini E, Aliani D, Scita G, et al. Strength recovery after proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate. Musculoskelet Surg 2014;98:61−9
  8. Costantino C, Verdano MA, Jacopetti M, Romiti D, Lunini E, Pel- legrini A, et al. Isokinetic strength test and functional outcomes in proximal humeral fractures treated with a locking plate. J Orthop Sci 2014;19:776−85
  9. Daumillare A, Bosch C, Julia M, Coulet B, Mares O, Chammas M. Volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures: Isokinetic assessment of the influence of an ulnar styloid process fracture on pronation-supination strength. Hand Surg Rehabil 2020;39:23−9
  10. Hammer OL, Clementsen S, Hast J, Benth JS, Madsen JE, Randsborg PH. Volar locking plates versus augmented external fixation of ıntra-ar- ticular distal radial fractures: Functional results from a randomized con- trolled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019;101:311−21
  11. Navarro CM, Ahrengart L, Tornqvist H, Ponzer S. Volar locking plate or external fixation with optional addi