Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

Return to sport rate following sports trauma-related delayed bucket-handle meniscus repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction

Pages
1148–1155
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The mean modified Lysholm knee score increased from 45.5 points to 91.5 at the final follow-up (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Return to sports rate of chronic meniscus repair concurrent with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains unclear, especially there is no well-defined return to sports criteria for evaluation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the success rate of chronic locked bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The mean modified Lysholm knee score increased from 45.5 points to 91.5 at the final follow-up (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Return to sports rate of chronic meniscus repair concurrent with Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains unclear, especially there is no well-defined return to sports criteria for evaluation. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the success rate of chronic locked bucket-handle meniscal tear (BHMT) repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction. METHODS: This study includes 51 chronic ACL injury patients with a locked meniscal tear of at least 6 weeks who underwent surgery. All cases were treated with arthroscopic BHMT repair and ACL reconstruction between 2017 and 2020. Patient demograph- ics, chronicity, pre-operative, and intraoperative surgical variables which associated with return to sports were defined. BHMT was repaired with an all-in-side meniscus repair and/or combined repair procedure first, then an anatomic outside-in ACL reconstruction using a suspension device for femoral fixation was performed. Patients underwent same rehabilitation program with the goal of return- ing to sport at approximately 4–8 months. A modified return-to-sport criterion was performed in this study. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with an average age of 27.4 (range 18–48) years were included in the study. The average time elapsed from the occurrence of locked knee symptoms to surgery was 10.5±4.4 weeks. The mean follow-up time was 25.3±4.5 months. Sig- nificant improvement was observed in all patient-reported outcomes from baseline to the final follow-up. The mean modified Lysholm knee score increased from 45.5 points to 91.5 at the final follow-up (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Başal, Ö., Aslan, T. T., Deniz, H. G., Bilge, O., Doral, M. N. (2022). Return to sport rate following sports trauma-related delayed bucket-handle meniscus repair with concomitant ACL reconstruction. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1148–1155. https://ajindex.com/articles/644060

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Westermann RW, Wright RW, Spindler KP, Huston LJ, MOON Knee Group, Wolf BR. Meniscal repair with concurrent anterior cruciate lig- ament reconstruction: Operative success and patient outcomes at 6-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2014;42:2184–92
  2. O’Shea JJ, Shelbourne KD. Repair of locked bucket-handle meniscal tears in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:216–20
  3. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Arthroscopic repair of meniscus tears extending into the avascular zone with or without anterior cruciate lig- ament reconstruction in patients 40 years of age and older. Arthroscopy 2000;16:822–9
  4. Gianotti SM, Marshall SW, Hume PA, Bunt L. Incidence of anterior cru- ciate ligament injury and other knee ligament injuries: A national popula- tion-based study. J Sci Med Sport 2009;12:622–7
  5. Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD. Long-term survivorship and function of meniscus transplantation. Am J Sports Med 2016;44:2330–8
  6. Feng H, Hong L, Geng XS, Zhang H, Wang XS, Jiang XY. Second-look arthroscopic evaluation of bucket-handle meniscus tear repairs with ante- rior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 67 consecutive cases. Arthroscopy 2008;24:1358–66
  7. Gallacher PD, Gilbert RE, Kanes G, Roberts SNJ, Rees D. Outcome of meniscal repair prior compared with concurrent ACL reconstruction. Knee 2012;19:461–3
  8. Kuo YH, Kuo CH, Chang HK, Tu TH, Fay LY, Chang CC, et al. Effects of smoking on pedicle screw–based dynamic stabilization: radiological and clinical evaluations of screw loosening in 306 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2020;33:398−405
  9. Choi NH, Kim TH, Victoroff BN. Comparison of arthroscopic medial meniscal suture repair techniques: Inside-out versus all-inside repair. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:2144–50
  10. Saltzman BM, Cotter EJ, Wang KC, Rice R, Manning BT, Yanke AB, et al. Arthroscopically repaired bucket-handle meniscus tears: Patient demographics, postoperative outcomes, and a comparison of success and failure cases. Cartilage 2020;11:77–87
  11. Vanderhave KL, Moravek JE, Sekiya JK, Wojtys EM. Meniscus tears in the young athlete: Results of arthroscopic repair. J Pediatr Orthop 2011;31:496–500
  12. Salem HS, Huston LJ, Zajichek A, Wolcott ML, McCarty EC, Vidal AF, et al. Meniscal repair with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament re- construction: Is ACL graft choice predictive of meniscal repair success? Orthop J Sport Med 2019;7 Suppl 5:2325967119S0035
  13. Wu IT, Hevesi M, Desai VS, Camp CL, Dahm DL, Levy BA, et al