Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Effect of fracture location on rate of conversion to open reduction and clinical outcomes in pediatric Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures

Pages
202–208
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Patients with low-level fractures were significantly younger (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common form of elbow fracture in children and adolescents.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of fracture location on the rate of conversion to open reduction and clinical outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Patients with low-level fractures were significantly younger (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common form of elbow fracture in children and adolescents. At present, treatment planning is based on the Gartland classification. Reduction and percutaneous pinning are done for Gartland type III fractures. In cases where closed reduction is unsuccessful, the procedure is converted to open reduction. However, there is no con sensus on which patients are more likely to require conversion to open reduction. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of fracture location on the rate of conversion to open reduction and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 112 patients who underwent early surgery for Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fracture between Au gust 2011 and August 2017 were evaluated. The patients’ age, sex, facture location, post-operative loss of reduction, and complications were noted. The fractures were classified according to fracture level relative to isthmus (high level) or at/below the isthmus (low level). Closed reduction was initially preferred. Open reduction with percutaneous pinning was performed, when necessary. Flynn’s criteria were used to evaluate elbow motion after treatment. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 39 months (16–62 months). The mean age of the patients was 6.4±2 years (1.4–12 years). Thir ty-nine of the patients were female, 73 were male; 32 fractures were in the dominant arm, 80 were in the non-dominant arm. Ninety of the fractures were classified as high level (proximal) and 22 as low level (distal). Patients with low-level fractures were significantly younger (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TOKYAY, A., OKAY, E., CANSÜ, E., AYDEMİR, A. N., EROL, B. (2022). Effect of fracture location on rate of conversion to open reduction and clinical outcomes in pediatric Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 202–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/644055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Tachdjian MO. Tachdjian’s Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2008
  2. Kasser J, Beaty J. Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus. In: Beaty JH, Kasser JR, editors. Rockwood and Wilkins’ Fractures in Children. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006. p. 543–589
  3. Sibinski M, Sharma H, Bennet G. Early versus delayed treatment of ex tension Type-3 supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Bone Joint J 2006;88:380–1. 4. de Buys Roessingh AS, Reinberg O. Open or closed pinning for distal humerus fractures in children? Swiss Surg 2003;9:76–81
  4. Silva M, Kazantsev M, Aceves Martin B, Delfosse EM. Pediatric supra condylar humerus fractures: İs surgeon experience a surrogate for the need of open reduction? J Pediatr Orthop B 2018;27:103– 7
  5. Giannini S, Maffei G, Girolami M, Ceccarelli F. The treatment of supra condylar fractures of the humerus in children by closed reduction and fixation with percutaneous Kirschner wires. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1983;9:181–8
  6. Otsuka NY, Kasser JR. Supracondylar fractures of the humerus in chil dren. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997;5:19–26
  7. Ramachandran M, Skaggs D, Crawford H, Eastwood D, Lalonde F, Vi tale M, et al. Delaying treatment of supracondylar fractures in children. Bone Joint J 2008;90:1228–33
  8. Li J, Fu D, Yu C, Wang S, Ze R, Tang X. Surgical management of delayed irreducible Gartland III supracondylar fractures in children: Open reduc tion and internal fixation versus external fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2017;26:299–304
  9. Sangkomkamhang T, Singjam U, Leeprakobboon D. Risk factors for loss of fixation in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Med Assoc Thai 2014;97:S23–8
  10. Kang S, Kam M, Miraj F, Park S. The prognostic value of the fracture lev el in the treatment of Gartland Type III supracondylar humeral fracture in children. Bone Joint J 2015;97:134–40
  11. Archibeck MJ, Scott SM, Peters CL. Brachialis muscle entrapment in dis placed supracondylar humerus fractures: A technique of closed reduction and report of initial results. J Pediatr Orthop 1997;17:298–302
  12. Aronson D, Van Vollenhoven E, Meeuwis J. K-wire fixation of supracon dylar humeral fractures in children: Results of open reduction via a ven tral approach in comparison with closed treatment. Injury 1993;24:179– 81
  13. Aktekin CN, Toprak A, Ozturk AM, Altay M, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY. Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment