Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

Does an infra pectineal plate alone provide adequate fixation in anterior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures? A comparative biomechanical study

Pages
1052–1058
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although IP fixation supported by anterior and posterior column screws with the limited combined approach is less invasive approach for patients, SP fixation should be included in the surgical treatment method to ensure adequate stability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare biomechanical properties of suprapectineal (SP) plate fixation, in- frapectineal (IP) plate fixation, and both SP and IP plate fixation in anterior column posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fractures of the acetabulum using posterior and anterior column screws.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: In 21 hard plastic left hemipelvis models, ACPHT fractures of the acetabulum were created, and in three different fixa- tion groups, the methods were compared: Group 1: SP plating using a 3.5 mm reconstruction plate and cortical screw fixation, Group 2: İnfrapectineal plating using 3.5 mm reconstruction plate and cortical screws combined with posterior and anterior column screws, and Group 3: Combined fixation with SP and IP plating using 3.5 mm reconstruction plates and cortical screws.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although IP fixation supported by anterior and posterior column screws with the limited combined approach is less invasive approach for patients, SP fixation should be included in the surgical treatment method to ensure adequate stability.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare biomechanical properties of suprapectineal (SP) plate fixation, in- frapectineal (IP) plate fixation, and both SP and IP plate fixation in anterior column posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fractures of the acetabulum using posterior and anterior column screws. METHODS: In 21 hard plastic left hemipelvis models, ACPHT fractures of the acetabulum were created, and in three different fixa- tion groups, the methods were compared: Group 1: SP plating using a 3.5 mm reconstruction plate and cortical screw fixation, Group 2: İnfrapectineal plating using 3.5 mm reconstruction plate and cortical screws combined with posterior and anterior column screws, and Group 3: Combined fixation with SP and IP plating using 3.5 mm reconstruction plates and cortical screws. Maximum load to failure (strength) of these three groups was compared between groups. RESULTS: The mean maximum load of failure for three groups was 2921 N, 2018 N, and 3658 N, respectively. When strength was compared considering the force that causing implant failure, it was determined that the strongest fixation was achieved when SP and IP fixation method were applied together, followed by SP only fixation and IP fixation supported by anterior and posterior column screws, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combined application of SP and IP fixation provides the most stable fixation of the ACPHT acetabular frac- tures, and IP fixation does not provide comparable biomechanical stability despite reinforcement with three-column screws placed away from the plate. Although IP fixation supported by anterior and posterior column screws with the limited combined approach is less invasive approach for patients, SP fixation should be included in the surgical treatment method to ensure adequate stability.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şimşek, E. K., Haberal, B., Mahmuti, A., Balçık, B. C., Demirörs, H. (2022). Does an infra pectineal plate alone provide adequate fixation in anterior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures? A comparative biomechanical study. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1052–1058. https://ajindex.com/articles/644048

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Culemann U, Holstein JH, Kohler D, Tzioupis CC, Pizanis A, Tosouni- is G, et al. Different stabilisation techniques for typical acetabular frac- ures in the elderly-a biomechanical assessment. Injury 2010;41:405–10
  2. Chen K, Yang F, Yao S, Xiong Z, Sun T, Guo X. Biomechanical compar- ison of different fixation techniques for typical acetabular fractures in the elderly: The role of special quadrilateral surface buttress plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102:e81
  3. Gillispie GJ, Babcock SN, McNamara KP, Dimoff ME, Aneja A, Brown PJ, et al. Biomechanical comparison of intrapelvic and extrapelvic fixa - tion for acetabular fractures involving the quadrilateral plate. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31:570–6
  4. Kistler BJ, Smithson IR, Cooper SA, Cox JL, Nayak AN, Santoni BG, et al. Are quadrilateral surface buttress plates comparable to traditional forms of transverse acetabular fracture fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:3353–61
  5. Culemann U, Marintschev I, Gras F, Pohlemann T. Infra-acetabular cor- ridor--technical tip for an additional screw placement to increase the fix- ation strength of acetabular fractures. J Trauma 2011;70:244–6
  6. May C, Egloff M, Butscher A, Keel MJ, Aebi T, Siebenrock KA, et al. Comparison of fixation techniques for acetabular fractures involving the anterior column with disruption of the quadrilateral plate: A biomechan- ical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018;100:1047–54
  7. Hobbie RK, Roth BJ. Intermediate physics for medicine and biology. Germany: Springer Science and Business Media; 2007
  8. Antell NB, Switzer JA, Schmidt AH. Management of acetabular frac- tures in the elderly. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2017;25:577–85
  9. Kacira BK, Özkaya M, Kiran U, Türkmen F, Arazi M, Demir T. Biomechanical fixation strength comparison of ilioingunial and me- dial stoppa approaches on anterior column fractures. J Mech Med Biol 2016;16:1650081
  10. Tanoglu O, Alemdaroglu KB, Iltar S, Ozmeric A, Demir T, Erbay FK. Biomechanical comparison of three different fixation techniques for ante- rior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures using anterior intrapelvic approach. Injury. 2018;49:1513–9
  11. Gras F, Marintschev I, Schwarz CE, Hofmann GO, Pohlemann T, Cule- mann U. Screw-versus plate-fixation strength of acetabular anterior column fractures: A biomechanical study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;72:1664–70
  12. Busuttil T, Teuben M, Pfeifer R, Cinelli P, Pape HC, Osterhoff G. Screw fixation of ACPHT acetabular fractures offers suff