Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8

Loop nerve graft prefabrication for peripheral nerve defect reconstruction

Pages
1043–1051
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Group 3 (−33.64±6.4) had a statistical difference compared to other groups (p0.05), whereas both groups had a statistical difference compared to Group 3 (10.44±1.96 mV/1.51±0.15 ms) (p0.05), whereas both groups had significantly poor axon counts compared to Group 2 (2531±91.18) (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Delayed autologous nerve graft reconstruction is inevitable in devastating injuries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated into three groups. 1.5 cm long peroneal nerve segment was excised, reversed in orientation, and used as autologous nerve graft.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Group 3 (−33.64±6.4) had a statistical difference compared to other groups (p0.05), whereas both groups had a statistical difference compared to Group 3 (10.44±1.96 mV/1.51±0.15 ms) (p0.05), whereas both groups had significantly poor axon counts compared to Group 2 (2531±91.18) (p
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Delayed autologous nerve graft reconstruction is inevitable in devastating injuries. Delayed or prolonged repair time has deleterious effects on nerve grafts. We aimed improving and accelerating nerve graft reconstruction process in a rat long nerve defect model with loop nerve graft prefabrication particularly to utilize for injuries with tissue loss. METHODS: Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated into three groups. 1.5 cm long peroneal nerve segment was excised, reversed in orientation, and used as autologous nerve graft. In conventional interpositional nerve graft group (Group 1), nerve defects were repaired in single-stage. In loop nerve graft prefabrication group (Group 2), grafts were sutured end-to-end (ETE) to the proximal peroneal nerve stumps. Distal ends of the grafts were sutured end-to-side to the peroneal nerve stumps 5 mm proximal to the ETE repair sites in first stage. In second stage, distal ends of the prefabricated grafts were transposed and sutured to distal nerve stumps. In staged conventional interpositional nerve graft group (Group 3), grafts were sutured ETE to proximal peroneal nerve stumps in first stage. Distal ends of the grafts and nerve stumps were tacked to the surrounding muscles until the final repair in second stage. Follow- up period was 4 weeks for each stage in Groups 2 and 3, and 8 weeks for Group 1. Peroneal function index (PFI), electrophysiology, and histological assessments were conducted after 8 weeks. P0.05). Group 3 (−33.64±6.4) had a statistical difference compared to other groups (p0.05), whereas both groups had a statistical difference compared to Group 3 (10.44±1.96 mV/1.51±0.15 ms) (p0.05), whereas both groups had significantly poor axon counts compared to Group 2 (2531±91.18) (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Öksüz, S., Eren, F., Cesur, C., Elmas, M. A., Şirvancı, S. (2022). Loop nerve graft prefabrication for peripheral nerve defect reconstruction. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 8, 1043–1051. https://ajindex.com/articles/644047

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Valero-Cabré A, Tsironis K, Skouras E, Navarro X, Neiss WF. Peripheral and spinal motor reorganization after nerve injury and repair. J Neuro- trauma 2004;21:95–108
  2. Eren F, Öksüz S, Küçükodaci Z, Kendirli MT, Cesur C, Alarçin E, et al. Targeted mesenchymal stem cell and vascular endothelial growth factor strategies for repair of nerve defects with nerve tissue implanted autoge- nous vein graft conduits. Microsurgery 2016;36:578–85
  3. Siemionow M, Bozkurt M, Zor F. Regeneration and repair of peripheral nerves with different biomaterials: Review. Microsurgery 2010;30:574– 88
  4. Mackinnon SE, Colbert SH. Principles and techniques of peripheral nerve repair, grafts, and transfers. In: Thorne CH, editor. Grabb and Smith’s Plastic Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. p. 77–86
  5. Birch R. Nerve repair. In: Wolfe SW, editor. Green’s operative hand surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 1035–74
  6. Mirsky R, Jessen KR, Brennan A, Parkinson D, Dong Z, Meier C, et al. Schwann cells as regulators of nerve development. J Physiol Paris 2002;96:17–24
  7. Sunderland S. Nerves and Nerve Injuries. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1978. p. 31–80
  8. Breidenbach WC, Terzis JK. Vascularized nerve grafts: An experimental and clinical review. Ann Plast Surg 1987;18:137–46
  9. Remensnyder J. Physiology of nerve healing and nerve grafts. In: Krizek TJ, editor. Symposium on basic science of plastic surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1976. p. 214–41
  10. Sulaiman OA, Gordon T. Role of chronic Schwann cell denervation in poor functional recovery after nerve injuries and experimental strategies to combat it. Neurosurgery 2009;65:A105–14
  11. Saheb-Al-Zamani M, Yan Y, Farber SJ, Hunter DA, Newton P, Wood MD, et al. Limited regeneration in long acellular nerve allografts is associ- ated with increased Schwann cell senescence. Exp Neurol 2013;247:165– 77
  12. Viterbo F, Trindade JC, Hoshino K, Mazzoni Neto A. Latero-terminal neurorrhaphy without removal of the epineural sheath. Experimental study in rats. Rev Paul Med 1992;110:267–75
  13. Jaberi FM, Abbas BP, Nezhad ST, Tanideh N. End-to-side neurorrha- phy: An experimental study in rabbits. Microsurgery 2003;23:359–62
  14. Bain JR, Mackinnon SE, Hunter DA. Functional evaluation of complete sciatic, peroneal, and posterior tibial nerve lesions in the rat. Plast Recon- str Surg 1989;83:129–38
  15. Lundborg G, Dahlin L, Danielsen N, Zhao Q. Trophism, tropism, and specific