SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 10

The comparison of pedobarographic parameters after calcaneal fractures

Turan Bilge Kızkapan
Kadir İlker Yıldız
Pages
1521–1526
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, on the injured side, the mean contact area (p=0.023) and forefoot pressures (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: This study aims to reveal surgical treatment’s effect on plantar load restoration and clinical outcomes compared to conservative treatment in intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: Thirty-two patients (Group 1) who underwent surgery for unilateral intra-articular calcaneal fractures and 28 patients who received conservative treatment (Group 2) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, on the injured side, the mean contact area (p=0.023) and forefoot pressures (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to reveal surgical treatment’s effect on plantar load restoration and clinical outcomes compared to conservative treatment in intra-articular calcaneal fractures. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (Group 1) who underwent surgery for unilateral intra-articular calcaneal fractures and 28 patients who received conservative treatment (Group 2) were included in the study. Detailed static pedobarography examinations were per- formed on all patients. Plantar load distribution was evaluated based on the forefoot maximum and mean pressure, hindfoot maximum and mean pressure, and distribution of pressure in the heel area in the mediolateral direction. Clinical results were evaluated with the American orthopedic foot and ankle association (AOFAS) score and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. RESULTS: While the mean contact area between injured and non-injured sides did not differ in Group 1, there was a significant dif- ference between the two sides in Group 2 (p=0.009). Furthermore, on the injured side, the mean contact area (p=0.023) and forefoot pressures (p

🔖

Cite This Article

Kızkapan, T. B., Yıldız, K. İ. (2022). The comparison of pedobarographic parameters after calcaneal fractures. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 10, 1521–1526. https://ajindex.com/articles/644023

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Zwipp H, Rammelt S, Barthel S. Calcaneal fractures: The most frequent tarsal fractures. Ther Umsch 2004;61:435–50
  2. Stulik J, Stehlik J, Rysavy M, Wozniak A. Minimally-invasive treat- ment of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1634–41. 3. van Tetering EA, Buckley RE. Functional outcome (SF-36) of patients with displaced calcaneal fractures compared to SF-36 normative data. Foot Ankle Int 2004;25:733–8
  3. Coughlin MJ. Calcaneal fractures in the industrial patient. Foot Ankle Int 2000;21:896–905
  4. Bridgman S, Dunn K, McBride D, Richards P. Withdrawn: Inter- ventions for treating calcaneal fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4:CD001161
  5. Hirschmuller A, Konstantinidis L, Baur H, Müller S, Mehlhorn A, Kontermann J, et al. Do changes in dynamic plantar pressure distribu- tion, strength capacity and postural control after intra-articular cal- caneal fracture correlate with clinical and radiological outcome? Injury 2011;42:1135–43
  6. Hetsroni I, Ben-Sira D, Nyska M, Ayalon M. Plantar pressure anomalies after open reduction with internal fixation of high-grade calcaneal frac- tures. Foot Ankle Int 2014;35:712–8
  7. Jansen H, Frey SP, Ziegler C, Meffert RH, Doht S. Results of dynamic pedobarography following surgically treated intra-articular calcaneal frac- tures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013;133:259–65
  8. Rosenbaum D, Lubke B, Bauer G, Claes L. Long-term effects of hindfoot fractures evaluated by means of plantar pressure analyses. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1995;10:345–51
  9. Allmacher DH, Galles KS, Marsh JL. Intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated nonoperatively and followed sequentially for 2 decades. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:464–9
  10. Ibrahim T, Rowsell M, Rennie W, Brown AR, Taylor GJ, Gregg PJ. Displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: 15-Year follow-up of a ran- domised controlled trial of conservative versus operative treatment. Inju- ry 2007;38:848–55
  11. Czurda T, Seidl M, Seiser AS, Schuh R, Trnka HJ, Ritschl P. Triple ar- throdesis in treatment of degenerative hindfoot deformities: Clinical, ra- diological and pedobarographic results. Z Orthop Unfall 2009;147:356– 61
  12. DeFrino PF, Brodsky JW, Pollo FE, Crenshaw SJ, Beischer AD. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: A clinical, pedobarographic and gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int 2002;23:496–502
  13. Chen Z, Zhang Y, Zheng Z, Guo M. Quantitative evaluation of postop- erative effect of calcaneal fractures using footscan system