Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7

Laboratory markers used in the prediction of perforation in acute appendicitis

Pages
960–966
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the perfo rated appendicitis group, white blood cell (WBC) value was 16.19±4.71 (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the laboratory markers used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) and present the parameters that can be used to predict acute perforated appendicitis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODS: The cases who underwent an appendectomy in our clinic between September 2018 and March 2020 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the perfo rated appendicitis group, white blood cell (WBC) value was 16.19±4.71 (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the laboratory markers used in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) and present the parameters that can be used to predict acute perforated appendicitis. METHODS: The cases who underwent an appendectomy in our clinic between September 2018 and March 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 530 patients who met the study criteria were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of an intraoperative perforation. Non-complicated appendicitis patients formed Group-1, and perforated appendicitis patients formed Group-2. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of the patients were compared. RESULTS: The number of non-complicated patients in Group 1 was 443, while there were 87 (16.4%) patients in Group 2 who had perforated appendicitis. The mean age of the patients in the normal appendicitis group was 29.90±10.51 years, and the mean age of the patients in the perforated appendicitis group was 36.32±14.58 years. In the normal appendicitis group, 257 (58%) of the patients were male, 186 (42%) were female, while in the perforated appendicitis group, 38 (43.7%) were male, 49 (56.3%) were female. In the perfo rated appendicitis group, white blood cell (WBC) value was 16.19±4.71 (p

🔖

Cite This Article

PATMANO, M., ÇETİN, D. A., GÜMÜŞ, T. (2022). Laboratory markers used in the prediction of perforation in acute appendicitis. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 7, 960–966. https://ajindex.com/articles/644022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Yeşiltaş M, Karakaş DÖ, Gökçek B, Hot S, Eğin S. Can Alvarado and appendicitis inflam-matory response scores evaluate the severity of acute appendicitis? Turkish J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018;24:557–62
  2. Viniol A, Keunecke C, Biroga T, Stadje R, Dornieden K, Bösner S, et al. Studies of the symptom abdominal pain--a systematic review and meta analysis. Family Pract 2014;31:517–29
  3. Çetinkaya E, Erdoğan A, Akgül Ö, Çelik C, Tez M. High serum cancer antigen 125 level in-dicates perforation in acute appendicitis. Am J Emerg Med 2015;33:1465–7
  4. Hanson KA, Jacob D, Saleh AA, Dissanaike S. In-hospital perforation risk in acute appendi-citis: Age matters. Am J Surg 2020;219:65–70
  5. Ergul E. Importance of family history and genetics for the prediction of acute appendicitis. Internet J Surg 2007;10:2
  6. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DN. Safety and efficacy of antibiotics compared with appen-dicectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: A meta-analysis of random-ized controlled trials. BMJ 2012;344:e2156
  7. Shogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, Shapiro NI. Diagnosing appendicitis: Evidence-based re-view of the diagnostic approach in 2014. Western J Emerg Med 2014;15:859–71
  8. Gavriilidis P, de’Angelis N, Evans J, Di Saverio S, Kang P. Hyperbilirubin emia as a predic-tor of appendiceal perforation: A systematic review and diagnostic test meta-analysis. J Clin Med Res 2019;11:171–8
  9. Beecher SM, Hogan J, O’Leary DP, McLaughlin R. An appraisal of in flammatory markers in distinguishing acute uncomplicated and compli cated appendicitis. Digest Surg 2016;33:177–81
  10. McGowan DR, Sims HM, Zia K, Uheba M, Shaikh IA. The value of bio chemical markers in predicting a perforation in acute appendicitis. ANZ J Surg 2013;83:79–83
  11. Chu SG, Becker RC, Berger PB, Bhatt DL, Eikelboom JW, Konkle B, et al. Mean platelet volume as a predictor of cardiovascular risk: A systemat ic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:148–56
  12. Korniluk A, Koper-Lenkiewicz OM, Kamińska J, Kemona H, Dymic ka-Piekarska V. Mean platelet volume (MPV): New perspectives for an old marker in the course and prognosis of inflammatory conditions. Me diators Inflamm 2019;2019:9213074
  13. Absenger G, Szkandera J, Pichler M, Stotz M, Arminger F, Weiss mueller M, et al. A derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts clinical outcome in stage II and III colon cancer pa-tients. Br J Cancer 2013;109:395–400
  14. Pine JK, Morris E, Hutchins GG, West NP, Jayne DG, Quirke P, et al. Sy