SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1

PARADIGMATIC PERSPECTIVES ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND FINANCIAL CRISES

Sinem Sefil
Pages
295–317
Publication Date
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By conducting an extensive literature review, this paper attempts to illustrate the views of the different schools of economic though on role of income distribution and inequality as a cause of the financial crises with a special focus on the subprime crisis in 2008.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The role of the income distribution and inequality among individuals and factors of production on the occurrence of financial crises has long been a controversial issue in economics literature and the stance of the economists on this debate is mainly rooted in their different views on the distributional mechanism in the economic system.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The role of the income distribution and inequality among individuals and factors of production on the occurrence of financial crises has long been a controversial issue in economics literature and the stance of the economists on this debate is mainly rooted in their different views on the distributional mechanism in the economic system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By conducting an extensive literature review, this paper attempts to illustrate the views of the different schools of economic though on role of income distribution and inequality as a cause of the financial crises with a special focus on the subprime crisis in 2008.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gelir dağılımı · finansal krizler · kriz teorileri

Abstract

The role of the income distribution and inequality among individuals and factors of production on the occurrence of financial crises has long been a controversial issue in economics literature and the stance of the economists on this debate is mainly rooted in their different views on the distributional mechanism in the economic system. By conducting an extensive literature review, this paper attempts to illustrate the views of the different schools of economic though on role of income distribution and inequality as a cause of the financial crises with a special focus on the subprime crisis in 2008.

Özet

The role of the income distribution and inequality among individuals and factors of production on the occurrence of financial crises has long been a controversial issue in economics literature and the stance of the economists on this debate is mainly rooted in their different views on the distributional mechanism in the economic system. By conducting an extensive literature review, this paper attempts to illustrate the views of the different schools of economic though on role of income distribution and inequality as a cause of the financial crises with a special focus on the subprime crisis in 2008.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sefil, S. (2016). PARADIGMATIC PERSPECTIVES ON INCOME DISTRIBUTION AND FINANCIAL CRISES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 1, 295–317. https://ajindex.com/articles/6437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. ACEMOGLU, Daron. Thoughts on inequality and the financial crisis. In AEA meeting, Denver (Vol. 7). 2011
  2. AKERLOF, George. Behavioral macroeconomics and macroeconomic behaviour. American Economic Review. 2002. 92(3). 411-433.
  3. AKERLOF, George. The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011. 84: 488–500.
  4. ANTONIO, Alves Jr., et al. Currency crises, speculative attacks and financial instability in a global world: a Post Keynesian approach with reference to Brazilian currency crisis (No. 2001-2007). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Curso de Pós-Graduação em Economia. 2001.
  5. ARESTIS, Philip. Post-Keynesian economics: towards coherence. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1996. 20(1): 111-135.
  6. ATKINSON, Anthony. et al. Top Incomes in the Long Run of History. Journal of Economic Literature. 2011. 49 (1): 3-71.
  7. ATKINSON, Anthony., Salvatore Morelli. Economic crises and Inequality. UNDP-HDRO Occasional Papers, (2011/6). 2011.
  8. BARAN, Paul. et al. Monopoly capital: An essay on the American economic and social order. Vol. 73. NYU Press. 1966.
  9. BARRON, Patrick. Why Monetary Expansion must stop. Mises Daily. 2011. available at https://mises.org/ library/why-monetary-expansion-must-stop BARONIAN, Laurent, Marx and Living Labour. Routledge. 2013.
  10. BASU, Santonu. Incomplete information and asymmetric information. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business. 2001. 4(2):23-48.
  11. BELL, Peter and Cleaver, Harry. Marx’s theory of crisis as a theory of class struggle. The Commoner. 2002. 5:1-61.
  12. BELLOFIORE, Riccardo. From Marx to Minsky: The Universal Equivalent, Finance to Production and the Deepening of the Real Subsumption of Labour under Capital in Money Manager Capitalism. In Ganssmann, H. eds. “New approaches to monetary theory. Interdisciplinary perspectives”. Routledge: Abingdon & New York, 2011. pp. 191-211.
  13. BEZEMER, Dirk. Causes of Financial Instability: Don’t Forget Finance. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College Working Paper No. 665. 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1808020 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808020
  14. BOETTKE, Peter J and Coyne, Christopher J. The debt–inflation cycle and the global financial crisis. Global Policy. 2011. 2.2: 184-189.
  15. BORDO, Michael and Meissner, Christopher M. Does inequality lead to a financial crisis?. Journal of International Money and Finance. 2012. 31(8): 2147-2161.
  16. BRENNER, Robert and SEONG-JIN Jeong. Overproduction not Financial Collapse is th