Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Yield and Quality Feature of Some Silage Sorghum and Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Cultivars in Ecological Conditions of Kırşehir Province

Kırşehir Ekolojik Koşullarında Bazı Silajlık Sorgum ile Sorgum-Sudanotu Melez Çeşitlerinin Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Pages
388–395
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To conclude; Greengo and Jumbo that had better results among the studied cultivars, are suggested as alternative forage crops in Kırşehir ecological condition.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This current study was conducted to determine adaption and quality characters of sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid during 2016-2017 summer growing seasons in Kırşehir province.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experimental was a randomized complete block design with three replications, three sorghum cultivars (Gözde 80, Early Sumac, Rox) and six sorghum-sudangrass (Aneto, Greengo, Teide, Sugar Graze, Gardavan, Jumbo) hybrid cultivars.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To conclude; Greengo and Jumbo that had better results among the studied cultivars, are suggested as alternative forage crops in Kırşehir ecological condition.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2016-2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This current study was conducted to determine adaption and quality characters of sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid during 2016-2017 summer growing seasons in Kırşehir province. The experimental was a randomized complete block design with three replications, three sorghum cultivars (Gözde 80, Early Sumac, Rox) and six sorghum-sudangrass (Aneto, Greengo, Teide, Sugar Graze, Gardavan, Jumbo) hybrid cultivars. There were significant differences in tested characters among sorghum and sorghum-sudangrass hybrid cultivars. According to average two years; dry matter yield of the cultivars was between 11855.3 (Gözde 80) and 28957.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1, crude protein yield was between 877.5 (Gözde 80) and 2799.8 (Jumbo) kg ha-1 and digestible dry matter yield was between 7396.5 (Gözde 80) and 17908.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1. Crude protein ratio ranged from 7.3 (Gözde 80) to 10.4 (Aneto) %, ADF from 30.1 (Rox) to 37.4 (Early Sumac) %, NDF from 44.6 (Rox) to 57.2 (Early Sumac) %, ADL from 4.2 (Early Sumac) to 5.6 (Teide ) % and digestible dry matter from 59.7 (Early Sumac) to 65.5 (Rox) %. To conclude; Greengo and Jumbo that had better results among the studied cultivars, are suggested as alternative forage crops in Kırşehir ecological condition.

Özet

Bu araştırma Kırşehir ilinde 2016-2017 yaz yetiştirme sezonunda bazı sorgum ve sorgum-sudanotu melez çeşitlerinin verim ve kalite özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla tek lokasyonda yürütülmüştür. Bölünmüş parseller deneme desenine göre üç tekerrürlü olarak yürütülen bu çalışmada, üç sorgum (Gözde 80, Early Sumac, Rox) ve altı sorgum-sudanotu (Aneto, Greengo, Teide, Sugar Graze, Gardavan, Jumbo) melez çeşidi kullanılmıştır. Denemeye alınan sorgum ve sorgum-sudanotu melez çeşitleri arasında özellikler bakımından önemli derecede farklılıkların olduğu belirlenmiştir. İki yıllık ortalama sonuçlara göre; çeşitlerin kuru madde verimleri 1185.3 (Gözde 80) – 28957.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1, ham protein verimleri 8777.5 (Gözde 80) ve 2799.8 (Jumbo) kg ha-1 ve sindirilebilir kuru madde verimleri 7396.5 (Gözde 80) ve17908.3 (Jumbo) kg ha-1. Protein oranı % 7.3 (Gözde 80) - 10.4 (Aneto), ADF oranı % 30.1 (Rox) - 37.4 (Early Sumac), NDF % 44.6 (Rox)- 57.2 (Early Sumac), ADL % 4.2 (Early Sumac) - 5.6 (Teide ) SKMO % 59.7 (Early Sumac) - 65.5 (Rox) arasında değişmiştir. Kırşehir ekolojik koşullarında verim ve kalite bakımdan Jumbo çeşidi ile Greengo çeşidi alternatif bir yem bitkisi olarak yetiştirilebileceği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHAN, B. D., KIR, H. (2022). Yield and Quality Feature of Some Silage Sorghum and Sorghum-Sudangrass Hybrid Cultivars in Ecological Conditions of Kırşehir Province. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 388–395. https://ajindex.com/articles/643106

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Acar, R., Akbudak, M., Sade, B. 2002. The determination of yield and some yield components of sorghum-sudangrass hybrid cultivars for silage production in Konya ecological conditions. Selcuk University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 16(29): 88-95.
  2. Açıkgöz, E. 2001.
  3. Yem Bitkileri. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Bursa 2001, 568 p. Akdeniz, H., Karslı, A. M., Nursoy, H., Yılmaz, İ. 2003. Determination of the chemical composition and digestible dry matter yields of some grain sorghum varieties. 27(6): 1349-1355. Anonymous, 2019. Analytical Methods Fiber Analyzer A200. Retrieved from www.ankom.com/analytical-methodssupport/ fiber-analyzer-a200. AOAC, 2005. Official methods of analysis. association of official analytical chemists (18th), (18th ed.)Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Maryland, USA. Atis, I., Konuskan, O., Duru, M., Gozubenli, H., Yilmaz, S. 2012. Effect of harvesting time on yield, composition and forage quality of some forage sorghum cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 14(6): 879-886.
  4. Ayaz, M., Özpinar, H., Yaman, S., Acar, A., Yasemin, A., Yavrutürk, Y., Niksarligil, F., Serhat, A., Aygün, Y. 2013. Analysing yield and quality characteristics of silage maize cultivars which are used commonly or may be use for main crop. Harran Journal of Agricultural, 17(2): 23-35.
  5. Canbolat, Ö. 2012. Comparison of İnvitro gas production, organic matter digestibility, relative feed value and metabolizable energy contents of some cereal forages. Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, 18(4): 571-577.
  6. Gençoğlan, C., Yazar, A. 1999. The effects of deficit irrigations on corn yield and water use efficiency. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 23: 233-241.
  7. Geren, H., Avcioğlu, R., Kır, B., Demiroğlu, G., Yılmaz, M.F., Cevheri, A.C. 2003. Effect of different sowing dates on the yield and quality characteristics of some maize cultivars grown as second crop for silage. Ege Journal of Agricultural Research, 40(3): 57-64.
  8. Geren, H., Kavut, Y.T. 2009. An investigation on comparison of sorghum (Sorghum sp.) species with corn (Zea mays L.) grown under second crop production. Ege Journal of Agricultural Research, 46(1): 9-16.
  9. Güneş, A., Acar, R. 2005. The determination of growing possibilties of sorghum-sudangrass cultivars as second crop under Karaman ecolojical conditions. Selcuk University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 19(35): 8-15.
  10. Horrocks, R.D., Valentine, J.F. 1999. Harvested Forages. Academic P