Journals / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops

Bazı Brassica Grubu Yem Bitkilerinin Yem Değeri ve Sindirilebilirlikleri Üzerine Farklı Kaba Yem Tipinin Etkileri

Pages
94–102
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings of this study, canola silage andmustard silage have the highest ether extract (EE) content, while mustard silage has the highest crude protein(CP) content (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to explore the effects of different forage types (fresh, hay and silage) on thechemical composition, forage quality and in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) of fodder turnip (Brassica rapa),fodder mustard (Brassica nigra) and canola (Brassica napus L.).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ankom Daisy incubator was used to determinethe IVTD and forages were incubated for 48 hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings of this study, canola silage andmustard silage have the highest ether extract (EE) content, while mustard silage has the highest crude protein(CP) content (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to explore the effects of different forage types (fresh, hay and silage) on thechemical composition, forage quality and in vitro true digestibility (IVTD) of fodder turnip (Brassica rapa),fodder mustard (Brassica nigra) and canola (Brassica napus L.). Ankom Daisy incubator was used to determinethe IVTD and forages were incubated for 48 hours. According to the findings of this study, canola silage andmustard silage have the highest ether extract (EE) content, while mustard silage has the highest crude protein(CP) content (P

Özet

Bu çalışma, Brassica grubu yem bitkilerinden yemlik şalgam (Brassica rapa), yemlik hardal (Brassica nigra) ve kanola (Brassica napus L.) bitkilerinde farklı kaba yem tiplerinin (taze ot, kuru ot ve silaj) besin madde içerikleri, kaba yem kaliteleri ve in vitro gerçek sindirilebilirlikleri (IVGS) üzerine etkilerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yürütülmüştür. IVGS’nin belirlenmesinde Ankom Daisy inkübatör kullanılmış ve yemler 48 saat süre ile inkübasyona bırakılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışma bulgularına göre; yemler arasında ham yağ (HY) içeriği bakımından en yüksek değerleri kanola silajları ve hardal silajları gösterirken, ham protein (HP) içeriği bakımından en yüksek değeri ise hardal silajları göstermiştir (P

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIC, U., ERISEK, A., GARIPOĞLU, A. V., ONDER, H., AYAN, İ. (2022). The Effects of Different Forage Types on Feed Values and Digestibilities in Some Brassica Fodder Crops. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 94–102. https://ajindex.com/articles/643078

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. AOAC. 1998. Officinal methods of analysis. 16th Edition,
  2. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD. AOCS. 2005. Official procedure, approved procedure Am 5-04, Rapid determination of oil/fat utilizing high temperature solvent extraction. American Oil Chemists Society, Urbana, IL. Ankom Technology 2005. In vitro true digestibility using th Daisy II Incubator. Available from http://www.ankom.com/media/documents /IVDMD_0805D200.pdf. Accessed:13.09.2010. Anonymous, 2006. Dairy industry drought response. feeding canola hay&silage. Available from http://www.dairyaustralia.com.au/files7Dro ught/canola_hay_silage_bulletin_no_8. pdf Accessed:29.11.2006
  3. Armstrong, R.H., Beattie, M.M., Robertson, E. 1993. Intake and digestibility of components of forage rape (Brassica napus) by sheep. Grass and Forage Science. 48 (4):410-415. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1993.tb01875.x Barry, T.N. 2013. The feding value of forage Brassica plants for grazing ruminant livestock. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 181,15-25.
  4. Buxton, D. R. 1996. Quality related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 59:37-49. Canbolat O. 2013. Effect of maturity stage on the potential nutritive value of canola (Brassica napus L.) hays. Journal of Veterinary Faculty of Ankara Univ 60 (2). 145-150.
  5. Canbolat, O.,Kara, H., Filya, I. 2013. Comparison of in vitro gas production, metabolizable energy, organic matter digestibility and microbial protein production of some legume hays. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag Univ. 27(2):71-81.
  6. Chaudhry, A. S. 1998. Chemical and biological procedures to upgrade cereal straw for ruminants. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews. Series B. 68:319-331.
  7. Doane, P. H., P. Schofield and A. N. Pell. 1997. Neutral detergent fibre disappearance, gas and volatile fatty acids production during the in vitro fermentation of six forages. Journal of Animal Science. 75:3342-3352.
  8. Filya, I. 2001. Silage Technology. Hakan Press.
  9. Izmir-Turkey. Fraser, M.D., Winters, A., Fychan, R., Davies, D.R., Jones, R. 2001. The effect of harvest date and inoculation on the yield, fermentation characteristics and feeding value of kale silage. Grass and Forage Science. 56(2):151– 161. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-494.2001.00262.x Hall, M.H., Jung, J. 2008. Use of Brassica Crops to Extend the Grazing Season. Available from http://extension.psu.edu/plants/crops/fora ges/species/use-of-Brassica-crops-toextend-the-grazingseason/extension_publica