Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 10

Regression Analysis for the Factor Affecting on Farm Land/Urban Land Value in Urban Sprawl

Kentsel Saçaklanma Alanlarındaki Arazilerin Değerini Etkileyen Faktörler için Regresyon Analizi

Pages
1357–1361
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of theseanalyses, all of environmental, amenity and economic factors should be considered forvaluation of urban sprawl.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the factors affecting on land value in urban sprawl were analysed viaregression analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the analyse, the nominal value of land was taken to be dependentvariable while factors affecting the value of the land in urban sprawl were considered tobe independent variables. 9 factors that were thought to affect the value of the land werehandled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of theseanalyses, all of environmental, amenity and economic factors should be considered forvaluation of urban sprawl.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the factors affecting on land value in urban sprawl were analysed viaregression analysis. In the analyse, the nominal value of land was taken to be dependentvariable while factors affecting the value of the land in urban sprawl were considered tobe independent variables. 9 factors that were thought to affect the value of the land werehandled. In this study, 3 separate models were analyzed, and all models providedstatistically significant results. The basic reason for applying three separate models is tobe witness the effects by including the variables in different categories (environmental,social amenity and economical factors) separately to the model. As a result of theseanalyses, all of environmental, amenity and economic factors should be considered forvaluation of urban sprawl.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kentsel saçaklanma alanlarında bulunan arazilerin değerini etkileyen faktörlerin regresyon modeli ile analizi yapılmıştır. Analizde arazinin nominal değeri bağımlı değişken olarak alınırken, değeri etkileyen 9 faktör bağımsız değişken olarak alınmıştır. Çalışmada 3 ayrı modl analiz edilmiş ve bütün modeller istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Üç ayrı model uygulamanın nedeni, farklı kategorilerdeki değişkenleri (çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik faktörler) modele ayrı ayrı dahil ederek etkilerinin görülmek istenmesidir. Analizler sonucunda, kentsel saçaklanma alanlarının değerlemesinde çevresel, ekonomik ve rahatlık sağlayan bütün faktörlerin dikkate alınması gerektiği ortaya konulmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAYACİ, Z. (2022). Regression Analysis for the Factor Affecting on Farm Land/Urban Land Value in Urban Sprawl. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 10, 1357–1361. https://ajindex.com/articles/643064

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Adrian JL, Cannon MD. 1992. Market for agricultural land in the rural-urban fringe of Dothan, Alabama, Bulletin 613, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama. Cavailhes J, Wavresky P. 2003. Urban influences on periurban farmland prices, European Review of Agricultural Economics 30 (3): 333-357.
  2. Coisnon T, Oueslati W, Salanie J. 2014. Spatial targeting of agrienvironmental policy and urban development, Ecological Economics 101: 33-42. European Environment Agency (EEA). 2006. Urban sprawl in Europe: the ignored challenge. European Commission, http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10.
  3. Eyoh A. Olayinka DN, Nwilo P, Okwuashi O, Isong M, Udoudo D. 2012. Modelling and predicting future urban expansion of Lagos, Nigeria from Remote sensing data using logistic regression and GIS, International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(5): 116-124.
  4. Fang J, Shenghe L, Hong Y, Qing Z. 2007. Measuring urban sprawl in Beijing with geo-spatial indices, Journal of Geographical Sciences, DOI: 10.1007/s11442-007-0469-z. Greene RP, Stager J. 2001. Rangeland to cropland conversions as replacement land for prime farmland lost to urban development, The Social Science Journal 38: 543–555. Gujarati DN. 1995. Basic econometrics, 4th Edition,
  5. United State Military Academy, New York. Heimlich RE, Anderson WD. 2001. Development at the fringe and beyond: impact on agriculture and rural land, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Economic Report No. 803. Hirt S. 2007. Suburbanizing Sofia: characteristics of postsocialist peri-urban change, Urban Geography, 28(8): 755- 780. Humstone E. 2004. Sprawl vs. smart growth: the power of the public purse, http://www.bostonfed.org/commdev/c&b/ 2004/summer/Sprawl.pdf Karakayaci Z. 2011. Tarim arazilerinin degerlemesinde cografi bilgi sistemlerinin kullanilmasi: Konya ili Cumra ilcesi ornegi, Yayinlanmamis Doktora Tezi, Konya. Livanis G, Moss CB, Breneman VE, Nehring RF. 2005.
  6. Urban sprawl and farm prices, Working Paper Series, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center, WPTC 05-05.
  7. Polyzos S, Minetos D, Niavis S. 2013. Driving factors and empirical analysis of urban sprawl in Greece, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 8(1): 5-29.
  8. Shi YJ, Phipps TT, Colyer D. 1997. Agricultural land values under urbanizing influences. Land Economics 73: 90–100.
  9. Slaev AD, Nikiforov I. 2013.
  10. Factors of urban sprawl in Bulgaria, SPATIUM International Review, 29: 22-29.
  11. Sudhira HS, Rama