Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 12

A Study on Mixing Camel Milk with Cow, Sheep and Goat Milk in Different Proportions in Yoghurt Production

Yoğurt Üretiminde Deve Sütünün Farklı Oranlarda Sığır, Koyun, Keçi Sütleriyle Karışımının Kullanımı Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Pages
2095–2102
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of analysis in which the highest viscosity and the fastestpH drop, mixtures were chosen as optimum points for yoghurt production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, the use of camel milk has increased as a new and alternative animal protein source forhuman consumption.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After preparing of milk mixtures heat treated at 90°Cfor 15 minutes the mixtures were cooled to 45°C.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of analysis in which the highest viscosity and the fastestpH drop, mixtures were chosen as optimum points for yoghurt production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Recently, the use of camel milk has increased as a new and alternative animal protein source forhuman consumption. However, there are some differences in the composition of camel milkcompared with other kind of milk sources. One of these differences is that camel milk contains inhigh concentrations of antimicrobial agents such as lysozyme, lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase andimmunoglobulins. In many studies, it was reported that camel milk is not suitable for production offermented milk especially for yoghurt due to the high concentration of antimicrobial substances. Theaim of this study, to investigate suitability of the mixture of camel milk with different ratio of cow,sheep and goat milk for yoghurt production. After preparing of milk mixtures heat treated at 90°Cfor 15 minutes the mixtures were cooled to 45°C. The starter culture (YC 350) was added andincubated at 42°C until the pH reached 4.7. During fermentation every hour the pH, SH and viscositywere measured. According to the results of analysis in which the highest viscosity and the fastestpH drop, mixtures were chosen as optimum points for yoghurt production. In these optimum pointsyoghurt production were performed and all of the samples were stored for 1., 7., 14. and 28. days at4°C. During the storage, water holding capacity and syneresis analyses were conducted. Accordingto the results, the optimum mixture was determined at 80% :20%cow milk:camel milk mixture.However, after 4 weeks of storage it was concluded that an increase in the syneresis and a decreasein water holding capacity (%) were found for yoghurt obtained from 80% :20:% cow-camel milk mixture.

Özet

Deve sütü, son zamanlarda insan tüketimi için yeni ve alternatif bir hayvansal protein kaynağı haline gelmiştir. Ancak, deve sütünün bileşimi diğer süt çeşitleriyle karşılaştırıldığında bazı farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu farklılıklardan birisi, deve sütünün lizozim, laktoferrin, laktoperoksidaz ve immünoglobulinler gibi yüksek konsantrasyonlarda antimikrobiyal maddeler içermesidir. Çoğu çalışmada deve sütünün yüksek oranda antimikrobiyal maddeler içermesinden dolayı fermente süt ürünleri özellikle de yoğurt üretimi için uygun olmadığı rapor edilmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, deve sütünün farklı oranda sığır, keçi ve koyun sütü ile karıştırılarak yoğurt üretimine uygunluğunun araştırılmasıdır. Belirlenen oranlarda karışımlar hazırlandıktan sonra, miksler 90°C’de 15 dakika ısıl işleme tabi tutulmuş ve 45°C’ye soğutulmuştur. Starter (YC-350) ilave edildikten sonra pH 4,7’ye ulaşıncaya kadar 42°C’de inkübe edilmiştir. Fermantasyon sırasında her saat pH, SH ve viskozite ölçümleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre yoğurt üretimi için pH düşüşünün en hızlı ve viskozitenin en yüksek olduğu optimum noktaları gösteren süt karışımları seçilmiştir. Bu optimum noktalarda yoğurt üretimi yapılarak 1., 7., 14. ve 28. gün boyunca 4°C’ de depolanmıştır. Depolama boyunca su tutma kapasitesi ve sinerez analizleri yapılmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre en optimum karışımın %80:%20 ineksütü: deve sütü karışımı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ancak, 4 haftalık depolamadan sonra, 80%:20% inek sütü-deve süt karışımından elde edilen yoğurtta sinerezde bir artış ve su tutma kapasitesinde bir düşüş (%) olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dumanoğlu, B., Özdemir, Ö. C., Bulca, S. (2022). A Study on Mixing Camel Milk with Cow, Sheep and Goat Milk in Different Proportions in Yoghurt Production. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 12, 2095–2102. https://ajindex.com/articles/642958

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abdel Rahman IE, Dirar HA, Osman MA. 2009. Microbiological and biochemical changes and sensory evaluation of camel milk fermented by selected bacterial starter cultures. African Journal of Food Science, 3: 398–405
  2. Abusheliabi A, Al-Holy MA, Al-Rumaithi H, Al-Khaldi S, AlNabulsi AA, Holley RA, Ayyas M. 2017. Growth Inhibition of Foodborne Pathogens in Camel Milk: Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp. and E. coli O157:H7. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 35: 311–320 Abu-Tarboush HM. 1995. Comparison of Associative Growth and Proteolytic Activity of Yoghurt Starters in Whole Milk from Camels and Cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 79:366-371
  3. Al-Ayadhi LY, Elamin E. 2013. Camel Milk as a Potential Therapy as an Antioxidant in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, ID 602834, 8 pages Al-Fakharany EM, Abu-Serie MM; Litus EA. 2018.
  4. The Use of Human, Bovine, and Camel Milk Albumins in Anticancer Complexes with Oleic Acid. Protein Journal, 37: 203-215
  5. Ayyash M, Al-Nuaimi AK, Al-Mahadin S, Liu SQ. 2018. In vitro investigation of anticancer and ACE-inhibiting activity, aamylase and a-glucosidase inhibition, and antioxidant activity of camel milk fermented with camel milk probiotic: A comparative study with fermented bovine milk, Food Chemistry, 239: 588-592 Benkerroum N. 2008. Antimicrobial activity of lysozyme with special relevance to milk. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7: 4856-4867
  6. Bornaz S, Sahli A, Attalah A, Attia H. 2009. Physico-chemical characteristics and renneting properties of camels’ milk: A comparison with goats’, ewes’, and cows’ milks. International Journal of Dairy Technology, 62: 505-513
  7. Dario C, Carnicella D, Dario M, Bufano G. 2008. Genetic polymorphism of β-lactoglobulin gene and effect on milk composition in Leccese sheep. Small Ruminant Research, 74(1-3): 270-273. Dean T. 1995. Cow’s milk allergy: therapeutic options and immunological aspects. European journal of clinical nutrition, 49: 19-25.
  8. Eissa EA, Yagoub AEA, Babiker EE, Ahmed, IAM. 2011.
  9. Physicochemical, Microbiological and Sensory Characteristics of Yoghurt Produced from Camel Milk During Storage. Electronic Journal of Enviromental, Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 10(6): 2305-2313
  10. El Agamy EIM, Nawar S, Shamsia M, Awad S, Haenlein GFW. 2009. Are camel milk proteins convenient to the nutrition of cow milk allergic children. Small Rum. Res. 82: 1-6
  11. El Zubeir IEM, Basher MAE, Alameen MH, Mohammed MAS, Shuiep ES. 2012.