Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 6

Effects of Using Hazelnut Husk, Wood Shaving and of the Mixture at Different Thicknesses on Broiler Performances, Some Organ Weights, Foot-Pad Dermatitis and Litter Traits

Pages
1399–1404
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been observed that these litter materials may be used successfully in broiler production and use of 8 cm thickness litter has minor positive effects except that the cost of litter has doubled.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the effects of the use of hazelnut husk (HH), wood shavings (WS) and the mixture of 50% hazelnut husk + 50% wood shavings (MIX) in two different thicknesses (4 and 8 cm) as a litter material in broiler production.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The experiment was carried out as a factorial experimental design (3 litter type and 2 thickness) and stocking density was 10 chickens per m2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been observed that these litter materials may be used successfully in broiler production and use of 8 cm thickness litter has minor positive effects except that the cost of litter has doubled.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of the use of hazelnut husk (HH), wood shavings (WS) and the mixture of 50% hazelnut husk + 50% wood shavings (MIX) in two different thicknesses (4 and 8 cm) as a litter material in broiler production. The experiment was carried out as a factorial experimental design (3 litter type and 2 thickness) and stocking density was 10 chickens per m2. At 6 wk. of age, the effect of litter types and thicknesses on broiler live weights, feed efficiency, and livability, were not significant. Also, no differences were found in terms of gizzard, digestive tract, abdominal fat and edible internal organ weight percentages. While carcass yield varied between litter groups, there was no difference between litter thicknesses. The litter moisture levels at the end of the trial were not affected the litter type and litter thickness, while the foot pad dermatitis (FPD) rates were significantly affected. The highest FPD levels were determined in the HH litter and 4 cm thickness. As a result, the use of HH, WS and MIX of them with a thickness of 4 and 8 cm had no effect on other traits except for FPD levels. It has been observed that these litter materials may be used successfully in broiler production and use of 8 cm thickness litter has minor positive effects except that the cost of litter has doubled.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sarıca, M., Erensoy, K. (2022). Effects of Using Hazelnut Husk, Wood Shaving and of the Mixture at Different Thicknesses on Broiler Performances, Some Organ Weights, Foot-Pad Dermatitis and Litter Traits. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 6, 1399–1404. https://ajindex.com/articles/642726

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Chakma S, Miah MY, Ara A, Kawsar MH. 2012. Feasibility of using fallen tea leaves as litter in broiler rearing. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 41(1): 52-54. doi: 10.3329/bjas.v41i1.11978.
  2. Cohuo-Colli JM, Salinaz-Ruiz J, Hernandez-Cazares AS, Hidalgo-Contreras JV, Brito-Damian VH, Velasco-Velasco J. 2018. Effect of litter density and foot health program on ammonia emissions in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 27: 198-205. doi: 10.3382/japr/pfx058. Ekstrand C, Algers B, Svenberg J. 1997. Rearing conditions and foot-pad dermatitis in Swedish broiler chickens. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 31: 167-174. doi: 10.1016/S0167- 5877(96)01145-2.
  3. El-Deek AA, Al-Harthi MA, Khalifah MM, Elbanoby MM, Alharby T. 2011. Impact of newspaper as bedding material in arid land on broiler performance. Egyptian Poultry Science, 31(4): 715-725.
  4. Garces APJT, Afonso SMS, Chilundo A, Jairoce CTS. 2017. Evaluation of different litter materials for broiler production in a hot and humid environment: 2. Productive performance and carcass characteristics. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 49: 369-374. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1202-7.
  5. Lima RC, Freitas ER, Gomes HM, Cruz CEB, Fernandes DE. 2018. Performance of broiler chickens reared at two stocking densities and coir litter with different height. Revista Ciencia Agronomica, 49(3): 1-14. doi: 10.5935/1806-6690. 20180059. Mayne RK. 2005. A review of the aetiology and possible causative factors of foot pad dermatitis in growing turkeys and broilers. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 61: 256-267. doi: 10.1079/WPS200458. Moesta A, Knierum U, Briese A, Hartung J. 2008. The effect of litter condition and depth on suitability of wood shavings for dust bathing behavior. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 115: 160-170. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.06.005. Monira KN, Islam MA, Alam MJ, Wahid MA. 2003. Effect of litter materials on broiler performance and evaluation of manureal value of used litter in late autumn. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Sciences, 16: 555-557. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2003.555. Munir MT, Belloncle C, Irle M, Federighi M. 2019. Wood based litter in poultry production: A review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 75: 1-12. doi: 10.1017 /S0043933918000909. Musa WI, Sa’idu L, Kaltungo BY, Abubakar UB, Wakawa AM. 2012. Poultry litter selection, management and utilization in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 6: 44-55. doi: 10.3923/ajpsaj.2012.44.55. Nowaczewski S, Rosisnski A, Markiewicz M, Kontecka