SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 12

A Research on the Comparative Effect of Active Dry Yeast and Inactivated- Stabilized Probiotic Yeast (Thepax) Added at Different Levels to Diets on Broiler Performanc

Süleyman Çalışlar
Rahmi Kanat
Pages
2219–2225
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been observed that active and inactive yeasts are used in broiler chickens without any problem

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This experiment was conducted to determine the effect of active yeast (AY) and inactive-stabilized yeast (Thepax) supplementation to the rations in different levels on broiler performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the experiment carried out according to the randomized plot design, there were 5 different treatment groups as control group (Group 1), 0.1% Thepax (Group 2), 0.2% Thepax (Group 3), 0.1% AY (Group 4) and 0.2% AY (Group 5).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been observed that active and inactive yeasts are used in broiler chickens without any problem
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the effect of active yeast (AY) and inactive-stabilized yeast (Thepax) supplementation to the rations in different levels on broiler performance. In the experiment carried out according to the randomized plot design, there were 5 different treatment groups as control group (Group 1), 0.1% Thepax (Group 2), 0.2% Thepax (Group 3), 0.1% AY (Group 4) and 0.2% AY (Group 5). In the experiment, the effects of active and inactive yeasts on body weight gain (BWG), feed consumption, feed conversion rate, carcass weight (CW), carcass yield (CY), abdominal fat amount and mortality were investigated. In the present experiment, the final live weight, the cumulative feed consumption and feed conversion were insignificant. The statistical difference between the groups in the experiment was significant in carcass weight, but insignificant in the amount of abdominal fat and mortality rate. Inactive-stabilized yeast (Thepax 0.1%) was more effective than 0.2% AY on BWG. Only 0.1% Thepax increased the CW besides CY was high in 0.1%, 0.2% Thepax and 0.1% AY groups. It has been observed that active and inactive yeasts are used in broiler chickens without any problem

🔖

Cite This Article

Çalışlar, S., Kanat, R. (2022). A Research on the Comparative Effect of Active Dry Yeast and Inactivated- Stabilized Probiotic Yeast (Thepax) Added at Different Levels to Diets on Broiler Performanc. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 12, 2219–2225. https://ajindex.com/articles/642643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Afsharmanesh M, Barani M, Silversides FG. 2010. Evaluation of wet-feeding wheat-based diets containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae to broiler chickens. British Poultry Science, 51(6): 776-783. Anonymous. 1983. Based on the amino acid, mineral and vitamin content of Cerevisiae a typical analysis for Thepax, Dox-al Italia SpA, Via Mascagni, Sulbiate Superiore. Monza E Brianza, Italy. Boostani A, Mahmoodian Fard HR, Ashayerizadeh A, Aminafshar M. 2013. Growth performance, carcass yield and intestinal microflora populations of broilers fed diets containing thepax and yogurt. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 15(1): 1-6.
  2. Brock TD, Smith DW, Madigan MT. 1984. Biology of Microorganisms, 4th edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 112 pp. Elgün A, Ertugay Z. 1990. Tahıl İşleme Teknolojisi. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayın No:718. s: 273-283.
  3. Fathi MM, Al-Mansour S, Al-Homidan A, Al-Khalaf A, Al- Damegh M. 2012. Effect of yeast culture supplementation on carcass yield and humoral immune response of broiler chicks. Veterinary World, 5(11): 651-657.
  4. Gao J, Zhang HJ, Yu SH, Wu AG, Yoon I, Quigley J, Gao YP, Qi GH. 2008. Effects of yeast culture in broiler diets on performance and immunomodulatory functions. Poultry Science, 87(7): 1377-1384.
  5. Gong J, Forster RJ, James HY, Chambers R, Wheatcroft R, Sabour PM, Chen S. 2002. Molecular analysis of bacterial populations in the ileum of broiler chickens and comparison with bacteria in the cecum. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 41(3): 171-179.
  6. Hassanein MS, Soliman, NK. 2010. Effect of probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) adding to diets on intestinal microflora and performance of hy-line layers hens. Journal of American Science, 6(11): 159-169. ISSN: 1545-1003. Köşker Ö. Çakmakçı L. 1985. Genel Mikrobiyoloji. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, 955, pp:94-95.
  7. Kubena LF, Chen TC, Deaton JW, Reece FN. 1974. Factors influencing the quantity of abdominal fat in broilers. Poultry Science, 53(1): 974-978.
  8. Martinez MJ, Roy S, Archuletta AB, Wentzell PD, Anna-Arriola SS, Rodriguez A L, Aragon AD, Quiñones GA, Allen C, Werner-Washburne M. 2004. Genomic analysis of stationary- phase and exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: gene expression and identification of novel essential genes. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 15(12): 5295-5305.
  9. Mohamed EA, Talha EA, Mojahid AA, Dafaalla EM. 2015. Effect of dietary yeast (saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics and some metabolic respon