Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6

Relationships between Animal Welfare Scores and Milk Somatic Cell Count in Anatolian Buffaloes

Pages
1120–1124
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Routinely keeping the records on AWS and its components, and adding AWS data to the herd management programs was suggested to the buffalo farm owners.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of the present study was to determine the relationships between animal welfare score (AWS) and milk somatic cell count (SCC) in Anatolian buffaloes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study carried out on 39 buffalo farms of Bafra district of Samsun province of Turkey between January and March 2020.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Routinely keeping the records on AWS and its components, and adding AWS data to the herd management programs was suggested to the buffalo farm owners.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to determine the relationships between animal welfare score (AWS) and milk somatic cell count (SCC) in Anatolian buffaloes. The study carried out on 39 buffalo farms of Bafra district of Samsun province of Turkey between January and March 2020. To obtain AWS data, a scale with 1 to 100 points (1-25: poor, 26-50: moderate, 51-75: suitable and ≥76: excellent) was used. Locomotion ability (LA), social interaction (SI), flooring (F), indoor conditions (IC) and effect of stockman (S) were used to be AWS parameters. Milk samples were analyzed by SCC using a portable cell counter. The SCC values were transferred to log10 base before the analyses. To assess the effects of AWS on logSCC, independent sample t-test was performed. The relations of all parameters with each other were calculated by Kendall rank correlation method and the statistical analyses were carried out by SPSS 17.0. The highest and the lowest means were obtained from SI (79.66±1.28) and F (61.79±2.51), respectively. While the highest correlation was estimated between IC and AWS (r=0.724), all AWS parameters had approximately moderate relations with AWS. Positive or negative, but insignificant correlation coefficients were estimated between any traits and logSCC. The means of SCC (136841±15522 cells/ml) and AWS (68.70±1.67) of the present study were found within the suitable thresholds. Routinely keeping the records on AWS and its components, and adding AWS data to the herd management programs was suggested to the buffalo farm owners.

🔖

Cite This Article

ATASEVER, S. (2022). Relationships between Animal Welfare Scores and Milk Somatic Cell Count in Anatolian Buffaloes. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6, 1120–1124. https://ajindex.com/articles/642573

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Angrecka S, Herbut P. 2015. Conditions for cold stress development in dairy cattle kept in free stall barn during severe frosts. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 60, 2015(2): 81–87. doi:10.17221/7978-CJAS Atasever S, Erdem H, Kul E. 2011. Relationship between somatic cell count and catalase activity in raw milk of Anatolian buffaloes. Scientific Research and Essays, 6(19): 4109-4112. doi:10.5897/SRE11.609 Atasever S, Stadnik L. 2015. Factors affecting daily milk yield, fat and protein percentage, and somatic cell count in primiparous Holstein cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 49(3):313-316. doi:10.5958/0976-0555.2015.000 48.5 Atasever S, Tóth V, Mikóné Jónás E. 2020. Factors affecting mastitis cases and the correlations of somatic cell count with milk production in Holstein cows. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 8(1): 171-173. doi: https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v8i1.171-173.2937 Bartussek H. 2001. An historical account of the development of the animal needs index ANI-35L as part of the attempt to promote and regulate farm animal welfare in Austria: an example of the interaction between animal welfare science and society. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A - Animal Science, 51 (suppl. 30): 34-41. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/090647001316923036 DeVries TJ, Aarnoudse MG, Barkema HW, Leslie KE, von Keyserlingk MAG. 2012. Associations of dairy cow behavior, barn hygiene, cow hygiene, and risk of elevated somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Science, 95 (10): 5730-5739. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5375
  2. DeVries M, Bokkers EAM, vanSchaik G, Botreau R, Engel B, Dijkstra T, deBoer IJM. 2013. Evaluating results of the welfare quality multi-criteria evaluation model for classification of dairy cattle welfare at the herd level. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(10): 6264–6273. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.2012- 6129 Durmaz C, Atasever S. 2019. Correlations of animal welfare scores with first lactation milk yield of dual-purpose cows. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(10): 1607-1610. doi: https://doi.org/10.24925/ turjaf.v7i10.1607- 1610.2653 Erdem H, Okuyucu IC. 2019. Influence of hygiene status of cows on somatic cell count and milk components during summer season. Large Animal Review, 25: 7-10.
  3. Frössling J, Ohlson A, Hallén-Sandgren C. 2017. Incidence and duration of increased somatic cell count in Swedish dairy cows and associations with milking system type. Journal of Dairy Science, 1