Journals / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6

Evaluation of Some Commercial Food Rations in Terms of Chemical Composition, Methane Production, Net Energy and Organic Substance Digestibility

Pages
1095–1101
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, for increase the productivity of livestock in small farms in Turkey, the ratios of feed raw materials at the farm scale were determined, and evaluations were made according to the results of the lower and upper limits obtained from the fattening rations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The change in living standards in developing countries and the rapid increment in the world population increase the need for plant and animal food.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This situation increases the amount of waste per unit of animal products.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, for increase the productivity of livestock in small farms in Turkey, the ratios of feed raw materials at the farm scale were determined, and evaluations were made according to the results of the lower and upper limits obtained from the fattening rations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The change in living standards in developing countries and the rapid increment in the world population increase the need for plant and animal food. Agriculture and animal husbandry practices become more common day by day to meet the need for food and obtain more products. This situation increases the amount of waste per unit of animal products. Increased animal excrement is associated with greenhouse gas emissions, it harms the environment and animal health. Methane, one of these greenhouse gases, increases poses significant threat to global warming. Today, studies that optimize rumen and animal productivity in order to reduce methane release caused by ruminant animals are among the subjects that attract the attention of researchers. This study is purpose to evaluate the beef rations in terms of chemical composition, methane production, net energy and organic matter digestibility by collecting roughage and concentrate feed mixtures (TMR) obtained from different livestock farms in Niğde province. Thus, for increase the productivity of livestock in small farms in Turkey, the ratios of feed raw materials at the farm scale were determined, and evaluations were made according to the results of the lower and upper limits obtained from the fattening rations. In vitro gas production technique was used for gas and methane production of TMR samples. Nutrient contents obtained from different livestock farms Crude Protein (9.58- 14.72), Raw Oil (1.89- 2.30), CA (7.64-13.92), ADF (19.77-27.82) NDF (36.71-45.69) Dry Matter (90.48-91.79), methane (CH₄), OMS, NEL and ME values were also different. In the study, it was observed that the ration contents were not calculated according to the age, developmental stage, fattening period and needs of the animal. It was determined that different rations were used in farms even in animal groups with similar characteristics. It can be said that a more economical and profitable animal husbandry can be made by recording the fattening performances of animals such as live weight gain, weight gain at the beginning and end of fattening, feed consumption.

🔖

Cite This Article

BOĞA, M., KILIÇ, H. N., AVCI, B. C. (2022). Evaluation of Some Commercial Food Rations in Terms of Chemical Composition, Methane Production, Net Energy and Organic Substance Digestibility. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 6, 1095–1101. https://ajindex.com/articles/642520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Allen DM, Grant RJ. 2000. Interactions between forage and wet corn gluten feed as sources of fiber in diets for lactating dairy cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 83(2): 322-331. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74882-X AOAC, 2000. Official methods of analysis of the association of the official analysischemists, Association of Official Analytical Chemists (15th ed.). Washington, DC, 1990.
  2. Beigh YA, Ganai AM, Ahmad HA. 2017. Prospects of complete feed system in ruminant feeding: a review, Veterinary World, 10(4): 424-2017. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.424-437 Blümmel M, Ørskov ER. 1993. Comparison of in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradabilities of roughages in predicting food intake of cattle, Animal Feed Science and Technology 40: 109–119. doi: 10.1016/0377- 8401(93)90150-I Boğa M, Çevik KK. 2012. Ruminant hayvanlar için karma yem hazırlama programı, XIV. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı Bildirileri, 1-3
  3. Şubat Uşak Üniversitesi, Türkiye; 2012. s. 249-256.
  4. Boğa M, Kocadayıoğulları F, Can ME. 2021. Tanenlerin ruminant hayvan beslemede kullanımı, Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 21-22. doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.937301 Boğa M, Kurt O, Ozkan, CO, Atalay Aİ, Kamalak A. 2020. Evaluation of some commercial dairy rations in terms of chemical composition, metane production, net energy and organic matter digestibility, Progress in Nutrition, 22(1): 199- 203. doi: 10.23751/pn.v22i1.8128 Canbolat Ö. 2006. Seçmeli yemlemenin kuzularda besi performansı, karkas özellikleri, bazı rumen sıvısı ve kan parametreleri üzerine etkileri, Phd, Uludağ Üniversitesi,
  5. Doktora tezi, Bursa, Türkiye, Gatechew G, Robinson P, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ, Gisi DD, Higginbotham GE, Riordan TJ. 2005. Metane production from commercial dairy rations estimated using an in vitro gas production technique, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123-124: 391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.056 Haque MN. 2018. Dietary manipulation: a sustainable way to mitigate metane emissions from ruminants, Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 60(1): 1-10. doi: 10.1186/s40781- 018-0175-7
  6. Hoover WH, Stokes SR. 1991. Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield, Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10): 3630-3644. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022- 0302(91)78553-6
  7. Johnson DE, Ward GM. 1996. Estimates of animal metane emissions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 42(1): 133-141. doi: 10.1007/BF00394046 Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995.
  8. Metane emissions from cattle, Journal of Animal Science,