Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

Study of physical characteristics of Indian handball players at different level of competition

Pages
17–19
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The independent samples t-test was applied to assess the differences between inter-school and inter-college level handball players.The level of significance was set at 0.05.The results of present study clearly indicated that inter-college level handball players had significantly greater power (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study was to compare the physical characteristics between Indian male handball players at different level of competition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study was conducted on a sample of forty eight(N=48), which includes twenty four each, male inter-school level (N1=24, mean ± SD: age 18.12 ± 0.80 years, height 176.83 ± 5.83cm, weight 69.04 ± 6.99 kg, BMI 22.07 ± 1.89) andinter-college level (N2=24, mean ± SD: age 20.54 ± 0.93 years, height 181.29 ± 3.44cm, weight 74.04 ± 3.89 kg, BMI 22.53 ± 1.30) handball players who participated in inter-school competitions of the schools affiliated to Punjab School Education Board and inter-college competitionsof Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The independent samples t-test was applied to assess the differences between inter-school and inter-college level handball players.The level of significance was set at 0.05.The results of present study clearly indicated that inter-college level handball players had significantly greater power (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare the physical characteristics between Indian male handball players at different level of competition. The present study was conducted on a sample of forty eight(N=48), which includes twenty four each, male inter-school level (N1=24, mean ± SD: age 18.12 ± 0.80 years, height 176.83 ± 5.83cm, weight 69.04 ± 6.99 kg, BMI 22.07 ± 1.89) andinter-college level (N2=24, mean ± SD: age 20.54 ± 0.93 years, height 181.29 ± 3.44cm, weight 74.04 ± 3.89 kg, BMI 22.53 ± 1.30) handball players who participated in inter-school competitions of the schools affiliated to Punjab School Education Board and inter-college competitionsof Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Punjab, India respectively. All the participants were informed about the aim and methodology of the study and they volunteered to participate in this study. All the participants were assessed for height, weight and selected physical characteristics. The height of the subjects was measured with anthropometric rod to the nearest 0.5 cm. The weight of subjects was measured by using portable weighing machine to the nearest 0.5 kg. The vertical jump test was used to measure explosive power of the legs whereas speed was determined by 30 meters dash. Illinois agility test was used to measure agility and medicine ball put testwas used to determine the shoulder girdle strength. The independent samples t-test was applied to assess the differences between inter-school and inter-college level handball players.The level of significance was set at 0.05.The results of present study clearly indicated that inter-college level handball players had significantly greater power (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GAURAV, V., SINGH, A. (2022). Study of physical characteristics of Indian handball players at different level of competition. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 17–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/642420

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Delamarce P, Gratas A, Beillot J, Dassonville J, Rochcongar P, Lessard Y. Extent of lactic anaerobic metabolism in handballers. Int J Sports Med. 1987; 8:55-9
  2. Getchell B. Physical Fitness: A Way of Life, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1979
  3. Gorostiaga EM, Granados C, Ibanez J, Izquierdo M. Differences in physical fitness and throwing velocity among elite and amateur male handball players. Int J Sports Med, 2005; 26:225-232
  4. Hassan AA, Rahaman JA, Cable NT, Reilly T. Anthropometric profile of elite male handball players in Asia. Biology of Sport, 2007; 24(1): 3-12
  5. Ilic V, Macura M, Ranisavljev I. Profile of young elite handball players according to playing positions. RIK, 2011; (39)1: 71-77
  6. Izquierdo M, Häkkinen K, Gonzalez‐Badillo JJ, Ib{ñez J, Gorostiaga EM. Effects of long term training specificity on maximal strength and power of the upper and lower extremities in athletes from different sports. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2002; 87: 264‐271
  7. Lidor R, Falk B, Arnon M, Cohen Y, Segal G, Lander Y. Measurement of talent in team handball: the questionable use of motor and physical tests. J Strength Cond Res, 2005; 19: 318-325
  8. Sibila M. Initial and further selection of children gifted for handball on the basis of some chosen morphological and motor parameters. Handball EHF Periodical, 1997; 1: 7-17
  9. Spori G, Vuleta D, Vuleta DJr, Milanovi D. Fitness profiling in handball: physical and physiological characteristics of elite players. Coll Antropol, 2010; 34 (3): 1009-1014
  10. Srhoj V, Marinovic M, Rogulj N. Position specific morphological characteristics of top-level male handball players. Coll Anthropol, 2002; 1: 219-227
  11. Stijn PJM, Vaeyens R, Vandendriessche J, Vandorpe B, Pion J, Aaron J, Coutts AJ, Lenoir M, Philippaerts RM. A multidisciplinary identification model for youth handball, European Journal of Sport Science, 2011; 11: 355-363
  12. Taborsky F. The body height and top team handball players. EHF web Periodical. 2007, Available on
  13. Wallace MB, Cardinale M. Conditioning for team handball. Strength Cond J, 1997; 19: 7‐12
  14. Ziv G, Lidor R. Physical attributes physiological characteristics, on-court performances and nutritional strategies of female and male basketball players. Sports Med, 2009; 39: 547-568.