Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the relationship between patellofemoral (q) angle differences with lower extremity performance in young and veteran volleyball players

Pages
136–143
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for intergroup comparisons, the Turkey test was used formultiple comparisons, and the correlation level was used to determine the relationship between the variables and thesignificance level was taken as p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was carried out to determine the relation between patella femoral (Q) angle differences and static equilibrium,flexibility and take-off force in young and veteran volleyball players.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To the study 20 young males with an average age of 18 ±00, 19 young females with a mean age of 18 ± 73, 21 veteran males with a mean age of 49 ± 04, 20 veteran females with a meanage of 48 ±70 who are registered players in Muğla Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports, a total of 80 athletes voluntarilyparticipated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for intergroup comparisons, the Turkey test was used formultiple comparisons, and the correlation level was used to determine the relationship between the variables and thesignificance level was taken as p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the relation between patella femoral (Q) angle differences and static equilibrium,flexibility and take-off force in young and veteran volleyball players. To the study 20 young males with an average age of 18 ±00, 19 young females with a mean age of 18 ± 73, 21 veteran males with a mean age of 49 ± 04, 20 veteran females with a meanage of 48 ±70 who are registered players in Muğla Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports, a total of 80 athletes voluntarilyparticipated. The height, body weight, right and left leg Q angles in standing and laying, balance, flexibility and vertical takeoff measurements were performed in the research group respectively. The statistical evaluation of the obtained data was donein SPSS 21.00 package program on a personal computer. In the data with normal distribution, the parametric statistical methodswere used. While the analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for intergroup comparisons, the Turkey test was used formultiple comparisons, and the correlation level was used to determine the relationship between the variables and thesignificance level was taken as p

🔖

Cite This Article

HAZAR, K. (2022). Investigation of the relationship between patellofemoral (q) angle differences with lower extremity performance in young and veteran volleyball players. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 136–143. https://ajindex.com/articles/642274

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Bompa. T.O. (1998). Antrenman kuramı ve Yöntemi. Çeviri
  2. Keskin. Tuner. A. Bağırgan Yayınevi: Ankara 2. Brody. D. M. 1980 "Running injuries". Ciba Clinical Symposia 32 (4): 9-13. 3. Byl T. Cole J. Livingston L. 2000. What determines the magnitude of the Q-angle? A preliminary study of selected skeletal and muscular measures. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation. 2000
  3. Caylor D. Fites R. Worrell T. The relationship between quadriceps angle and anterior knee pain syndrome. JOSPT. 1993
  4. 5 5. Grant. S. Hynes. V. Whittaker. A. & Aitchison. T. (1996). Anthropometric. strength. endurance and flexibility characteristics of elite and recreational climbers. Journal of sports sciences. 14(4). 301-309. 6. Horton MG. Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle anglenormal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys. Ther. 1989
  5. 901 7. İpek. Z. Ziyagil. M.A. (2002). Erkek ve bayan voleybolcuların fiziksel özellikleri ve fizyolojik kapasitelerinin sedanterlerle karşılaştırılması. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bil. Dergi. 4(2). 12-16. 8. Koç H. Aslan CS. Erkek Hentbol ve Voleybol Sporcularının Seçilmiş Fiziksel ve Motorik Özelliklerinin Karşılaştırılması. Selçuk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitim ve Spor Bilim Dergisi. 2010
  6. 12(3): 227-231. 9. Koç. H. Özcan. K. Pulur. A. Ayaz. A. (2007). Elit bayan hentbolcular ile voleybolcuların bazı fiziksel ve fizyolojik parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 5(3). 123-128. 10. Lale. B. Müniroğlu. S. Çoruh. E.E. Sunay. H. (2003). Türk erkek voleybol milli takımının somatotip özelliklerinin incelenmesi. Spormetre Bed. Eğ. Ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 1(1). 53-56. 11. Nalçakan GR. Voleybolcuların İzokinetik Kas Kuvvetleri ile Dikey Sıçrama Yükseklikleri Arasındaki İlişki düzeyi. Spor Fizyolojisi Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. İzmir. 2001. 12. Puhl J. Case S. Fleck S. Handel V.Physicalandphysiologicalcharacteristics of elitevolleyballplayers. Res. Quart. 1982
  7. 257–262. 13. Recreational Climbers. Journal of Sports Sciences. 14: 301-309. 1996. 14. Riley. D. (1995). “Voleybol İçin Kuvvetlilik Çalışması”. Çeviri: H. Can. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Voleybol Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi. 3 (5): 22–39. 15. Schnabel G. Harre D. Borde A. Grundkonzept “SportlicheLeistung”. In: Trainingswissenschaft. 10. Ausg. G Schnabel. Hrsg. Berlin. SportVerlag. 1997. 32-79. 16. Schulties SS. Francis RS. Fisher AG. Van der Graaf KM. Does the Q