Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Body Composition and Somatotype Profiles of Rowers

Pages
431–437
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: This study supports that rowers have the body composition proportional to the normal fat percentage and the mesomorph body type associated with high muscle strength as somatotype.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the body composition and somatotype profiles of rowers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: 15 male rowers having at least 4 years rowing training from two different rowing clubs in Sinop participated voluntarily in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: This study supports that rowers have the body composition proportional to the normal fat percentage and the mesomorph body type associated with high muscle strength as somatotype.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the body composition and somatotype profiles of rowers. Method: 15 male rowers having at least 4 years rowing training from two different rowing clubs in Sinop participated voluntarily in this study. In athletes, conditions such as being healthy, not having chronic or acute disease and having no limitation of mobility were sought. In body 120 Body Composition Analyzer was used to assess the body composition components and Skinfold caliper-tape measurement was used to determine somatotype profiles. Mean and standard deviations of the participants were calculated by using SPSS 22.0 V. package program. Results: Mean values of body composition of the rowers were respectively; body fat ratio %15.94±6.84, body fat mass 11.73±5.76 kg, skeletal body mass 34.207±5.98 kg, basal metabolic rate 1674±211.65 kcal and total body water 44.36±7.10 l. Somatotype profiles values of athletes were found endomorph 2.01±0.71, mesomorph 4.75±0.82 and ectomorph 2.70±0.71 body type. Conclusion: This study supports that rowers have the body composition proportional to the normal fat percentage and the mesomorph body type associated with high muscle strength as somatotype.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACAR, K., ARSLANOĞLU, E., MOR, A., BAYNAZ, K., İPEKOĞLU, G., ARSLANOGLU, C. (2022). Body Composition and Somatotype Profiles of Rowers. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 431–437. https://ajindex.com/articles/642173

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ackland TR, Kerr D, Hume PA, Ridge B, Clark S, Broad EM,Ross WD. Anthropometric normative data for Olympicrowers and paddlers. In: 2001: a sport medicine odyssey:challenges, controversies and change. Perth: Australian Conference of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2001. 2.Akça F, Akalan C, Koz M, Ersöz G. İnvesgation of oxygen consumption and lactact e profiles in Turkish Elite Jjunior Rowers. SPORMETRE The Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 2010; 13(2): 77-80. 3.Atabeyoğlu C. Türk Yüzme Tarihi. Türk Spor Vakfı Yayınları.İstanbul: Dünya Yayıncılık. 1993. 4.Battista RA, Pivarnik JM, Dummer GM, Sauer N, Malina RM.Comparisons of physical characteristics and performances among female collegiate rowers, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007; 25(6): 651-657. 5.Bourgois J, Claessens AL, Vrijens J, Philippaerts, Renterghem BV, Thomis M, Janssens M, Loos R, Lefevre J. Anthropometriccharacteristics of elite male junior rowers. Sports Medicine, 2000; 34(3): 213-216. 6.Carter JEL. The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotypeinstruction manual. San Diego, 2002; 15-17. 7.Claessens AL. Talent detection and talent development: Kinanthropometric Issues. Acta Kinesiologiae Universitatis Tartuensis. 1999; 4: 47-64. 8.Cosgrove MJ, Wilson J, Watt D, Grant SF. The relationship between selected physiological variableso of rowers androwing performance as determined by a 2000 m ergometertest. Journal of Sports Sciences, 1999; 17: 849-852. 9.Çetinkaya E. Elit kürekçilerle sedanterlerin antropometrik ölçümlerinin karşılaştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya, 2009. 10.Çıkmaz S, Taşkınalp O, Uluçam E, Yılmaz A, Çakıroğlu M. Anthropometric measurements and proportions of body constitution in football players. Medical Journal of Trakya University, 2005; 22(1): 32-36. 11.Eston R, Hawes M, Martin A. Reilly T. Kinantropometry andExercise Physiology Laboratory Manuel: Tests, Proceduresand Data. 3th ed. Abingdon, Routledge. 2009; 54-62. 12.Hanel B, Gustafsson F, Larsen HH, Secher NH. Influence of exercise pulmonary diffusion capacity. International Journalof Sports Medicine, 1993; 14(1): 11-14. 13.Hazır T, Açıkada C. Reliability of bioelectrical impedanceanalysis for the assessment body composition: a comparative study. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2002; 13(2): 2-18. 14.Kaloupsis S, Bogdanis GC, Dimakopoulou E, Maridaki M. Anthropometrıc Characteristics and Somatotype of YoungGreek Rowers. Biology of Sport, 2008; 25(1); 57-69. 15.Kılınç F.