Journals / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Determination of Physical Activity Levels of Karabük University Students

Pages
253–258
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be said that BMI is effective on the level of Vigorous Physical Activity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The sedentary lifestyle is one of the most important problems for today's societies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 1717 students, 843 males and 874 females, studying in different departments, participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be said that BMI is effective on the level of Vigorous Physical Activity.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Physical activity · exercise · BMI

Abstract

The sedentary lifestyle is one of the most important problems for today's societies. Health-related behaviors that an individual gains early in his life affect the individual's quality of life in adulthood. The purpose of this study was to examine the physical activity (PA) levels of students studying at Karabük University according to the variables of gender, the program attended and body mass index (BMI). A total of 1717 students, 843 males and 874 females, studying in different departments, participated in the study. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form was used to collect data in the study. Frequency, percentage, Mann Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. As a result of the research, it was seen that 27.8% of the students were not physically active, 38.2% of them had moderate physical activity levels, and 34% had sufficient PA levels. While 45.9% of male students had sufficient PA level, this rate was 22.4% for female students. A significant difference was found in PA scores of the students in terms of gender. A significant difference was found in the scores of vigorous PA according to the BMI of the students. As a result, it was observed that the student's physical activity level was low, the physical activity level changed according to gender, and male students were more active than females. It can be said that BMI is effective on the level of Vigorous Physical Activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜKSEL, Y., AYDOĞMUŞ, M., KAYIŞOĞLU, N. B., REVAN, S. (2022). Determination of Physical Activity Levels of Karabük University Students. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 253–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/642139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Akduman V, Timurtaş E, Mete E, Kartal M, Yıldız A, Sarı Z. Does physical activity level affect low back pain? Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;3(1):11-8.
  2. Arıkan Ş, Revan S. Relationship Between Physical Activity Levels and Body Compositions of University Students. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise. 2019.
  3. Arslan S, Daskapan A, Cakir B. Specification of nutritional and physical activity habits of university students. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2016;15(3):171-80.
  4. Bergier J, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Biliński P, Paprzycki P, Wojtyła A. Physical activity of Polish adolescents and young adults according to IPAQ: a population based study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19(1):109-15.
  5. Bonevski B, Guillaumier A, Paul C, Walsh R. The vocational education setting for health promotion: a survey of students' health risk behaviours and preferences for help. Health Promot J Austr. 2013;24(3):185-91.
  6. Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell W. Physical Activity and Health: Human Kinetics; 2012.
  7. Cevdet C, İnce ML, Şeref Ç. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyleri ve Fiziksel Aktivite Tercihleri. Gazi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2009;14(2):23-32.
  8. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-95.
  9. Dagmar S, Erik S, Karel F, Ales S. Gender Differences in Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior and BMI in the Liberec Region: the IPAQ Study in 2002-2009. J Hum Kinet. 2011;28:123-31.
  10. Das P, Horton R. Physical activity—time to take it seriously and regularly. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1254-5.
  11. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1302-10.
  12. Erdoğan B, Revan S. Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;3(2):1-7.
  13. Erdoğan M, Certel Z, Güvenç A. Masa Başında Çalışanlarda Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyi: Obezite ve Diğer Özelliklere Göre İncelenmesi (Akdeniz Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Hastanesi Örneği). Spor Hekimliği Dergisi. 2011;46(3):97-107.
  14. Grim M, Hortz B, Petosa R. Impact evaluation of a pilot web-based intervention to increase