SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Pediatri Arşivi / 2002 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 8

Laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube applications in pediatric cases undergoing minor surgery

Çocuklarda kısa süreli minör cerrahi girişimlerde "Larengeal Maske" ve "Larengeal Tüp" uygulaması

Gönül SAĞIROĞLU
Mehlika Pınar BESLER
Melek ÇELİK
Turgay KEPÇE
Esra SAĞIROĞLU
Pages
376–381
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The rate of first attempt success was significantly higher in the LMA group (% 100) than the LT group (% 70, p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to investigate the laryn-geal mask airway (LMA) and the laryngeal tube (LT) comparatively in anaesthetized pediatric cases, undergoing short lasting minor surgical operations. 39 ASA I-II patients were randomly enrolled into this prospective clinical study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Airway was secured with LMA in 20 cases and with LT in 19 cases respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The rate of first attempt success was significantly higher in the LMA group (% 100) than the LT group (% 70, p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the laryn-geal mask airway (LMA) and the laryngeal tube (LT) comparatively in anaesthetized pediatric cases, undergoing short lasting minor surgical operations. 39 ASA I-II patients were randomly enrolled into this prospective clinical study. Airway was secured with LMA in 20 cases and with LT in 19 cases respectively. The rate of first attempt success was significantly higher in the LMA group (% 100) than the LT group (% 70, p

Özet

Çalışmamız, kısa süreli cerrahi girişimler için anestezi uygulanacak çocuk olgularda larengeal maske (LMA) ile larengeal tüpün (LT) karşılaştırılmalı olarak incelenmesini amaçlamıştır. Bu prospektif klinik çalışmaya rasgele 39 ASA I-II olgu katıldı. Havayolu sırasıyla 20 olguda LMA, 19 olguda ise LT, ile sağlandı, ilk denemede başarı oranı , LMA. grubunda (% 100) LT grubundan (% 70, p

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞIROĞLU, G., BESLER, M. P., ÇELİK, M., KEPÇE, T., SAĞIROĞLU, E. (2022). Laryngeal mask airway and laryngeal tube applications in pediatric cases undergoing minor surgery. Türk Pediatri Arşivi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 8, 376–381. https://ajindex.com/articles/641773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Charters P: Airway devices: where now and where to? Br J Anaesth 2000; cS5:504-5
  2. Brain AIJ: The development of the laryngeal mask: A brief history of the invention, early clinical studies and experimental work from which the laryngeal mask evolved. Eur J AnaesthesioU997;4(SuppI):5-17
  3. American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway: Practice Guidelines for Management of. the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 1993; 78:597
  4. Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiac Care: Recommendations of the 1992 National Conference of the American Heart Association. JAMA 1992; 268:2203
  5. The Airway and Ventilation Management Working Group of the European Resuscitation Council: Guidelines for the advanced management of the airway and ventilation during resuscitation. Resuscitation 1996; 31:201 -31
  6. Brain AIJ: Historical aspects and future directions. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1998; 36:1-18
  7. Crcighton RE: The infant airway (Editorial). Can J Anaesth 1994:41:174-6
  8. Rumball CJ, MacDonald D: The PTL, combitube, laryngeal mask and oral airway: a randomised prehospital comparative study of ventilatory device effectiveness and cost effectiveness in 470 cases of cardiopulmonary arresyt. Prehosp Emerg Care 1997; 1:1-10
  9. Kraft P, Martin R, Fridrich P, Locker GJ, Frass M, Benumof JL: Bronchoscopy via a redesigned Combitube in the oesophageal position: A Clinical Evaluation. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:1248-53
  10. Grenberg RS, Toung T: The cuffed oro-pharyngeal airway. A pilot study. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:A558
  11. Greenberg RS, Brimacombe J, Berry A, Gouze V, Piantadosi S, Darke E: A randomized controlled trial compar¬ ing cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized adults.Anesthesiology 1998; 88:970-7
  12. Şener M, Akpek EA, Arslan G: Kısa süreli cerrahi girişimlerde "Kaflı orofaringeal havayolu" ve "Larengeal maske" uygulaması. Anestezi Dergisi 2000; 8(4):275-8
  13. Brimacombe JR, Brimacombe AM, Berry AM, Morris R, Mecklem D, Clarke G, Barry J, Kirk T: A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anaesthetized adult patients. Anesth Analg 1998; 87:147
  14. Voyagis GS, Dimitriou VK, Kvriakis KB: Comparative evaluation of the prolonged use of the. cuffed oropharyngeal air¬ way and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16:371-5
  15. Paterson SJ, Byrne P