Journals / Koşuyolu Heart Journal / 2006 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS

Stent Içi Restenoz

Pages
34–47
Publication Date
2006-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review summarizes the current understanding of the pathogenesis of ISR and provides an objective overview of DESs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The introduction of intracoronary stents into clinical practice has dramatically changed treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Unfortunately, the procedure's utility is limited by a frequent complication: restenosis At the moment, repeat balloon angioplasty is considered to be the first line treatment option, especially in focal lesions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review summarizes the current understanding of the pathogenesis of ISR and provides an objective overview of DESs.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Osman Karakaya · PTCA · stent

Abstract

The introduction of intracoronary stents into clinical practice has dramatically changed treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Unfortunately, the procedure's utility is limited by a frequent complication: restenosis At the moment, repeat balloon angioplasty is considered to be the first line treatment option, especially in focal lesions. The recent introduction of drug-eluting stents (DESs) may help prevent ISR. However, DESs have not been universally successful, and they may introduce new complications that require further refinement. This review summarizes the current understanding of the pathogenesis of ISR and provides an objective overview of DESs.

Özet

Koroner girisimlerde stentlerin kullanılması koroner arter hastalıgının tedavisini dramatik olarak degistirmistir. Ancak bu girisim sıklıkla restenoz adı verilen bir süreçle sınırlanmaktadır. Restenozun özellikle fokal restenozların ilk tedavi seçenegi tekrarlayan balon anjiyoplastilerdir. Son yıllarda ilaç kaplı stentlerin (IKS) kullanılmaya baslanmasıyla birlikte stent içi restenoz oranları azalmaya baslamıstır. Bununla beraber IKS kullanımında universal bir basarı tanımlanmamıs üstelik yeni komplikasyonların tanınmaya baslamasıyla tartısılır hale gelmistir. Bu derlemede stent içi restenozun fizyopatolojisini güncel bilgiler ısıgında anlamayı ve IKS lerin bu süreci nasıl etkiledigini gözden geçirecegiz

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAKAYA, O., ESEN, A. M. (2006). IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. Koşuyolu Heart Journal, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 34–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/64157

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. I. Serruys PW. de.laeger P. Kiemcneij F et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent imp- lantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med
  2. 33l:489—95. Fıt-StemRes'renavit 42 I. Fischman DL. Leon MD. Baim DS et al. A randomized comparison ot‘coronary-stent pla- eement and balloon angioplasty in treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med |994233lz49o—Sş|. Mehran R. Dangas G. Abizaid A S. ct al. “Angiograpl'tic patterns of in—stent restenosis. ClassiŞcation and implications for long-term outcome". Circulation. 199 [1999}. pp. LEITZ—S. Cardiovasc lnterv. 1999. 48. lilo-323. Bonnier J J R M. Stent coating or brachy— therapy? Their future role in cndovascular the- iht’mne Hi.-"ı"um.üı
  3. n' _?_ 2ı9ı9ı'î rapy of coronary artery disease. Progress in Bi— omedical Research. zoao. 229-232. Rogers C. Edelman E R. Ende-vascular stcnl design dictates experimental restenosis attd thrombosis. Circulation. 266l. 9l. 2995- 3661. I?. Kcrciakes D J. Cox D A. Hermiller J E. et aI. Usefulness of a cobalt chromium coronary stent alloy. Ant J Cardiol. 2663. 92. 463—466. Ciıtlip D E. Chauhan M S. Baim D S. et al. “Clinical resıenosis after coronary stcnting: perspectives frotn multiccntcr trails”. J Am Coll Cardicl. 4a {zoos}. pp. Loss—sı. Farb A. Weber D K. Kolodgie F D. et al. “Morphological predictors of restenosis alter coronary stenting in humans“. Circulation. 165 pp. 2.932—3. Serruys P W. van l-iout E Bonnier H. Leg- rand ‘v’. et aI. Randomized comparison oF imp— lantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease {Benestent ll}. Lancet. 1993. 352. T3F63I. |. Reinters E. Moussa [. Akiyama T. et aI. “Long-term clinical Fellow—up after successful repeat pcreutaneotts intervention for stent reste- nosis“. J Am Coll Cardiol. 36 “9921. pp. lil—6 92. Dauerman ll L. Baim D S. Cutlip D E. et al. hllvtecl'tanical debulking versus balloon angi— oplasty for the treattnent of diffuse in-stent res- tenosis".An1J Cardiol. 62 (1996). pp. ETT—64. Albiero R. Silber S. Di Mario C. et al. “The RESCUT Investigators. Cutting balloon verses conventional balloon angioplasty for the treat- ment ol'in—sıent restenosis: results ol‘ the reste— ııosis eutting balloon evalttation trial [RES- CUTl". J Am Coll Cardiol. 43 [2664]. pp. —9. Harrington R A. Lineott‘A M. Caliş'R M. et al. “Characteristics and consequences of myo- cardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention: in