SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Pediatri Arşivi / 2010 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4

Volume guarantee ventilation versus pressure limit ventilation in newborn babies

Yenidoğanda volüm garantili ventilasyon ile basınç kontrollü ventilasyonun karşılaştırılması

Yalçın ÇELİK
Bülent Aziz ÖZKAN
Aytuğ ATICI
Ali Haydar TURHAN
Pages
324–328
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Volume guarantee mode may be more preferable than pressure control ventilation in newborn babies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of newborn babies ventilated with volume gurantee and pressure control ventilation modes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of Mersin University Hospital, between 2007 and 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Volume guarantee mode may be more preferable than pressure control ventilation in newborn babies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of newborn babies ventilated with volume gurantee and pressure control ventilation modes. Material and Method: The study was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of Mersin University Hospital, between 2007 and 2008. A total of 91 babies requiring mechanical ventilation were included in this study. Short and long term consequences of mechanical ventilation were compared in babies ventilated with volume guarantee (n:49) or pressure control modes (n:42). Results: Duration of mechanical ventilation was shorter and the frequency of respiratory alkalosis was lower among babies ventilated with volume guarantee mode, but this difference was not statistically significant. The rates of pneumothorax and mortality were significantly higher in babies ventilated with pressure control mode (p=0.014, p=0.029 respectively). Conclusions: Volume guarantee mode may be more preferable than pressure control ventilation in newborn babies.

Özet

Amaç: Volüm garantili mekanik ventilasyon uygulanan bebeklerle basınç kontrollü mekanik ventilasyon uygulanan bebeklerin incelenmesi ve hangi yöntemin daha uygun olduğunun araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Mersin Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Yenidoğan Yoğun Bakım Birimi'nde 2007-2008 yıllarında mekanik ventilasyon uygulanarak izlenen 91 bebek çalışmaya alındı. Bebekler volüm garantili solutma işlemi uygulananlar (VG grubu; n:49) ve basınç kontrollü solutma işlemi uygulananlar (BK grubu; n: 42) olarak iki gruba ayrılarak erken ve geç dönemdeki bulguları incelendi. Bulgular: Volüm garantili grubunda mekanik ventilasyon süresi daha kısa ve solunumsal alkaloz sıklığı daha az saptanmakla birlikte bu fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı değildi. Basınç kontrollü grubundaki bebeklerde pnömotoraks ve ölüm oranları anlamlı derecede yüksek saptandı (sırasıyla p=0,014, p=0,029). Çıkarımlar: Yenidoğan bebeklerde volüm garantili solutma işleminin basınç kontrollü solutma işlemine göre daha tercih edilebilir olduğu kanısına varıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, Y., ÖZKAN, B. A., ATICI, A., TURHAN, A. H. (2022). Volume guarantee ventilation versus pressure limit ventilation in newborn babies. Türk Pediatri Arşivi, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 4, 324–328. https://ajindex.com/articles/641511

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Keszler M, Abubakar KM. Volume guarantee ventilation. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 107-16
  2. Luyt K, Wright D, Baumer JH. Randomised study comparing extent of hypocarbia in preterm infants during conventional and patient triggered ventilation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2001; 84: 14-7
  3. Dreyfuss D, Saumon G. Ventilator-induced lung injury: lessons from experimental studies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157: 294-323
  4. Wiswell TE, Graziani LJ, Kornhauser MS, et al. Effects of hypocarbia on the development of cystic periventricular leukomalacia in premature infants treated with high-frequency jet ventilation. Pediatrics 1996; 98: 918–24
  5. McCallion N, Davis PG, Morley CJ.Volume-targeted versus pressure-limited ventilation in the neonate. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005, Issue 3. Art. No.:CD003666. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003666.pub2
  6. Keszler M, Abubakar KM. Volume guarantee: stability of tidal volume and incidence of hypocarbia. Pediatr Pulmonol 2004; 38: 240-5
  7. Fujimoto S, Togari H, Yamaguchi N, Mizutani F, Suzuki S, Sobajima H. Hypocarbia and cystic periventricular leukomalacia in premature infants. Arch Dis Child 1994; 71: 107–10
  8. Okumura A, Hayakawa F, Kato T, et al. Hypocarbia in preterm infants with periventricular leukomalacia: the relation between hypocarbia and mechanical ventilation. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 469–75
  9. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978; 187: 1-7
  10. Lista G, Colnaghi M, Castoldi F, et al. Impact of targeted-volume ventilation on lung inflammatory response in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Pediatr Pulmonol 2004; 37: 510-4
  11. Keszler M. Volum-targed ventilation. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82: 811-8
  12. Nassabeh-Montazami S, Abubakar KM, Keszler M. The impact of instrumental dead-space in volume-targeted ventilation of the extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infant. Pediatr Pulmonol 2009; 44: 128-33
  13. Herrera CM, Gerhardt T, Claure N, et al. Effects of volume-guaranteed synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants recovering from respiratory failure. Pediatrics 2002; 110: 529-33
  14. Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana F, et al. Lung inflammation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: effects of ventilation with different tidal volumes. Pediatr Pulmonol 2006; 41: 357-63
  15. Sinha S, Donn S, Gavey J, McCarty M. Randomised trial of volume controlled versus