Journals / Türk Pediatri Arşivi / 2013 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3

Demographic findings of 104 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi deneyimi-104 olgunun demografik bulguları

Pages
210–214
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite complications, PEG procedure seems to be safe for supporting children with nutritional problems. (Turk Arch Ped 2013; 48: 210-4)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate demographic findings of 104 children who had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Children, who had undergone PEG insertion procedure between 2005 and 2012 have been included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite complications, PEG procedure seems to be safe for supporting children with nutritional problems. (Turk Arch Ped 2013; 48: 210-4)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate demographic findings of 104 children who had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion procedure. Material and Method: Children, who had undergone PEG insertion procedure between 2005 and 2012 have been included in the study. Demographic data has been collected retrospectively from the clinic charts. Results: A hundred and four patients (44 girls, 46%) with 269 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and percutaneous gastrostomy related procedures in the last seven years were enrolled in this study. Mean follow-up time was 36.5 months (3-84 months). Patients with neurological disabilities and metabolic diseases constituted the majority (45% and 40% respectively). Median age of patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy procedure was 5.9 years (2 months-16 years), mean weight was 17.7 kg ( 3-47 kg). Median Z score before PEG procedure was -1.98. Follow-up weight Z scores were available for 45 patients. Follow-up Z score was 1.21 at a mean of 18 months after the PEG procedure (p=0.0007). Major complication was seen in three patients (%2.8). Minor complications were observed in 10% of all procedures. Skin complications were seen in 13 patients (12.5%). Local infections in the stoma site were the most common skin complication (7/13). Systemic infections were not observed. Conclusions: Children with metabolic diseases constituted a major subgroup in our cohort. This finding is an important difference of our cohort compared to other European pediatric series in which primary neurological disabilities are the main indication for PEG. Despite complications, PEG procedure seems to be safe for supporting children with nutritional problems. (Turk Arch Ped 2013; 48: 210-4)

Özet

Amaç: Çocukluk döneminde perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi işlemi yapılan olguların demografik bulgularını değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 2005-2012 arasında endoskopi birimimizde perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi işlemi uygulanan olgular alınmıştır. Olguların demografik bulguları, hasta dosyalarından elde edilmiş ve geriye dönük olarak incelenmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışma grubumuzda yedi sene içinde 104 olguya (46 kız, %44), 269 perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi ve perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi ilişkili işlem gerçekleştirilmişti. Ortalama izlem süresi 36,5 aydı (3- 84 ay). Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi işlemi uygulanmış olguların çoğunluğunu nörolojik ve metabolik hastalıkları olan olgular oluşturmaktaydı (sırasıyla %45 ve %40). Perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi işlemi uygulanmış olgularda ortanca yaş 5,9 (2 ay - 16 yaş), ortalama tartı 17,7 kg (3-47 kg) idi. Olguların işlem öncesi tartı Z skoru ortanca değeri -1,98 olarak hesaplandı. Kırk beş olgunun işlem sonrası ortalama on sekizinci ayda ortanca Z skor değeri 1,21 olarak bulundu (p=0,0007). Önemli komplikasyon üç olguda (%2,8), hafif komplikasyon tüm işlemler arasında %10 sıklıkta saptanmıştı. İşleme bağlı cilt komplikasyonu sıklığı %12,5 (n=13) idi. En sık görülen cilt komplikasyonu yerel stoma enfeksiyonuydu (7/13). Çalışma grubumuzdaki hastalarda sistemik enfeksiyon gözlenmemiştir. Çıkarımlar: Bir çok ülkeden bildirilen olgu serilerinden farklı olarak ülkemizde perkütan endoskopi gastrostomi gereksinimi olan çocuklar arasında metabolik hastalığı bulunanların sıklığı dikkati çekmektedir. Komplikasyonların görülmesine karşılık, perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi işlemi, çocukluk çağında beslenmenin sağlanmasında güvenilir bir y öntemdir. (Türk Ped Arfl 2013; 48: 210-4)

🔖

Cite This Article

DURMAZ, Ö., GERENLİ, N., ERTEKİN, V., CANTEZ, M. S. (2022). Demographic findings of 104 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Türk Pediatri Arşivi, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 3, 210–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/641266

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15(6): 872-5
  2. Keymling M, Schlee P Worner W. Percutaneous endoscopy-, controlled gastrostomy. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1987; 112(5): 182-3
  3. Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-20 years later: a historical perspective. J Pediatr Surg 2001; 36(1): 217-9
  4. Fortunato JE, Troy AL, Cuffari C, et al. Outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and young adults. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010; 50(4): 390-3
  5. Srinivasan R, Irvine T, Dalzell M. Indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and procedure-related outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2009; 49(5): 584-8
  6. Catto-Smith AG, Jimenez S. Morbidity and mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children with neurological disability. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21(4): 734-8
  7. Aquino VM, Smyrl CB, Hagg R, McHard KM, Prestridge L, Sandler ES. Enteral nutritional support by gastrostomy tube in children with cancer. J Pediatr 1995; 127(1): 58-62
  8. Pedersen AM, Kok K, Petersen G, Nielsen OH, Michaelsen KF Schmiegelow K. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in, children with cancer. Acta Paediatr 1999; 88: 849-52
  9. Parbhoo DM, Tiedemann K, Catto-Smith AG. Clinical outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children with malignancies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011; 56: 1146-8
  10. Yılmaz B, Erdem D, Kemal Y. Kanser hastalarında beslenme. İç Hastalıkları Dergisi 2011; 18: 133-43
  11. Locher JL, Bonner JA, Carroll WR, et al. Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in treatment of head and neck cancer: a comprehensive review and call for evidence-based medicine. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2011; 35: 365-74
  12. Fröhlich T, Richter M, Carbon R, Barth B, Köhler H. Review article: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 788-801
  13. Ulukaya Durakbaşa Ç, Okur H, Mutuş HM, ve ark. Çocuklarda perkütan endoskopik gastrostomi (PEG) uygulamalarının endikasyonları, komplikasyonları ve sonuçlarına ilişkin bir derleme. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi 2008; 22: 122-6.