SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Pediatri Arşivi / 2020 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

The birth prevalence of selected major congenitalanomalies: Six-year’s experience in a tertiary carematernity hospital

Özel olarak seçilmiş majör konjenital anomalilerin doğumdaki yaygınlığı: Üçüncü basamak bir doğum hastanesinde altı yıllık deneyim

Fuat Emre Canpolat
Dursun Türkbay
Turan derme
NAHİDE ALTUG
YAVUZ YILMAZ
Pages
393–400
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prevalence of anomalies requiring specific

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the birth prevalence of specifically selected major congenital anomalies and to determine the correlated neonatal and maternal characteristics.Material and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from hospital-based records of infants who were born at 22 completed weeks of gestation with a birth weight of more than 500 g in Zekai Tahir Burak Gynecology Training and Research Hospital between 2013 and 2018.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Average annual prevalences were calculated for each selected major congenital anomaly.Results: The total prevalence of congenital anomalies was 9.97 per 1000 in 102 379 live birth cohorts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The prevalence of anomalies requiring specific
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the birth prevalence of specifically selected major congenital anomalies and to determine the correlated neonatal and maternal characteristics.Material and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from hospital-based records of infants who were born at 22 completed weeks of gestation with a birth weight of more than 500 g in Zekai Tahir Burak Gynecology Training and Research Hospital between 2013 and 2018. Abortions, stillbirths, and terminated pregnancies due to fetal anomalies were excluded. Average annual prevalences were calculated for each selected major congenital anomaly.Results: The total prevalence of congenital anomalies was 9.97 per 1000 in 102 379 live birth cohorts. The prevalence of severe congenital heart anomalies (SI-SII) was found as 21.1 per 10 000 live births. Down syndrome and meningomyelocele were the second and third most common anomalies, after congenital heart defects (13.87 and 9.97 per 10 000 live births, respectively). The prevalence of anomalies requiring specific

Özet

Amaç: çalışmanın amacı, özel olarak seçilmiş majör konjenital anoma lilerin doğum yaygınlığını değerlendirmek ve bu anomalilerle ilişkiliyenidoğan ve anneye ait özellikleri belirlemekti. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Veriler, Ankara Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın HastalıklarıEğitim ve Araştırma hastanesinde 2013 ile 2018 yılları arasında, gestas yonel 22 haftasını tamamlamış ya da 500 g üstü canlı doğan bebeklerinhastane tabanlı kayıtlarından geriye dönük olarak toplandı. Düşükler,ölü doğumlar ve fetal anomali nedeniyle gebelik terminasyonu yapılanbebekler çalışmaya alınmadı. Seçilmiş majör konjenital anomali türü nün her biri için ortalama yıllık prevalanslar hesaplandı. Bulgular: Majör konjenital anomalilerin genel prevalansı 102 379 canlıdoğum kohortunda 1 000’de 9,97 hesaplandı. Ağır konjenital kalp ano malilerinin (SI-SII) total prevalansı 10 000 canlı doğumda 21,1 bulundu.Konjenital kalp hastalıklarından sonra, Down sendromu ve meningo miyelosel doğumda en sık gözlenen anomalilerdi (sırasıyla 10 000 canlıdoğumda 13,87 ve 9,97). Özgün cerrahi ameliyat gerektiren anomaliler 1

🔖

Cite This Article

Canpolat, F. E., Türkbay, D., derme, T., ALTUG, N., YILMAZ, Y. (2022). The birth prevalence of selected major congenitalanomalies: Six-year’s experience in a tertiary carematernity hospital. Türk Pediatri Arşivi, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, 393–400. https://ajindex.com/articles/640962

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. World Health Organization. Congenital anomalies. Fact sheet No 370. October 2012
  2. CDC. Update on overall prevalence of major birth defects-Atlanta, Georgia, 1978–2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2008; 57: 1–5
  3. Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD, Curtin SC, Arias E. Deaths: Final Data for 2015. Natl Vitl Stat Rep 2017; 66: 1–75
  4. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK). Ölüm Nedeni İstatistikleri, 2013-2018
  5. Mason CA, Kirby RS, Sever LE, Langlois PH. Prevalence is the preferred measure of frequency of birth defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005; 73: 690–2
  6. Kirby RS. The prevalence of selected major birth defects in the United States. Semin Perinatol 2017; 41: 338–44
  7. St Louis AM, Kim K, Browne ML, et al. Prevalence trends of selected major birth defects: A multi-state popula- tion-based retrospective study, United States, 1999 to 2007. Birth Defects Res 2017; 109: 1442–50
  8. Egbe AC. Birth defects in the newborn population: race and ethnicity. Pediatr Neonatol 2015; 56: 183–8
  9. Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al, National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Updated national birth prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2010; 88: 1008–16
  10. Ko JK, Lamichhane DK, Kim HC, Leem JH. Trends in the prevalences of selected birth defects in Korea (2008– 2014). Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: E923
  11. World Health Organization. Birth defects surveillance a manual for programme managers. Available from: URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/110223 /9789241548724_ eng.pdf
  12. Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E; European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) Working Group. Congenital heart defects in Europe: prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation 2011; 123: 841–9
  13. Khoshnood B, Greenlees R, Loane M, Helen Dolk H; EUROCAT Project Management Committee; EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT Public health ındicators for congenital anomalies in Europe. Birth defects research (Part A): Clinical and Molecular Teratology 2011; 91: 16– 22
  14. Le MT, Shumate CJ, Hoyt AT, Wilkinson AV, Canfield MA. The prevalence of birth defects among non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders and American Indians/Alaska Natives in Texas, 1999–2015. Birth Defects Res 2019; 111: 1380–8
  15. Mai CT, Isenburg J, Langlois PH, et al. Population-based birth defects data in the United States, 2008 to 2012: Presentation of state-specific data and descripti