SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Patoloji Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Baş ve boyun kitlelerinin ince iğne aspirasyon sitolojisinde konvansiyonel yaymalar ve ThinPrep'in karşılaştırılması

Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional smears in head and neck fine needle aspiration cytology

Fulya KÖYBAŞIOĞLU
Demet YILMAZER
Gülşen Güler ŞİMŞEK
Ünsal HAN
Binnur ÖNAL
Pages
159–165
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cellularity, informative background and cytoplasmic details were statistically significant in conventional smear group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The ThinPrep Processor has gained popularity as a collection and preparation technique for fine needle aspiration cytology in addition to Papanicolaou smear test.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: We reviewed 71 consecutive fine needle aspiration cytology specimens and the conventional smear and ThinPrep slides diagnosed without knowledge of histopathologic diagnosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cellularity, informative background and cytoplasmic details were statistically significant in conventional smear group (p
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The ThinPrep Processor has gained popularity as a collection and preparation technique for fine needle aspiration cytology in addition to Papanicolaou smear test. The aim of this study was to compare the various cytologic features of ThinPrep and conventional smear in head and neck masses. Material and Methods: We reviewed 71 consecutive fine needle aspiration cytology specimens and the conventional smear and ThinPrep slides diagnosed without knowledge of histopathologic diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA test on SPSS program.Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups as regard to the presence of monolayer cells, cell architecture, and nuclear details (p>0.05). Cellularity, informative background and cytoplasmic details were statistically significant in conventional smear group (p

Özet

Amaç: ThinPrep Processor, Papanicolaou yayma tekniğ ine ilaveten ince iğne aspirasyonu için preparat hazı rlama tekniği olarak kullanılan popüler bir yöntemdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı baş boyun kitlelerinde Thin- Prep ve konvansiyonel yaymada çeşitli sitolojik özellikleri karşılaştırmaktır. Materyal ve Metod: Ardışık olarak 71 ince iğne aspirasyon sitolojisi materyali değerlendirildi. Histopatolojik tanıları bilinmeksizin konvansiyonel yaymalar ve ThinPrep preparatları değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel de- ğerlendirme SPSS programında ANOVA testi ile yapıldı.Bulgular: Tek tabaka hücreler, hücre yapısı ve nükleer detayların varlığına göre her iki grupta da istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu (p>0.05). Hücresellik, bilgilendirici zemin ve sitoplazmik detaylar konvansiyonel yayma grubunda istatistiksel olarak daha iyi idi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖYBAŞIOĞLU, F., YILMAZER, D., ŞİMŞEK, G. G., HAN, Ü., ÖNAL, B. (2022). Baş ve boyun kitlelerinin ince iğne aspirasyon sitolojisinde konvansiyonel yaymalar ve ThinPrep'in karşılaştırılması. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 159–165. https://ajindex.com/articles/640870

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. McGuirt WF. The Neck Mass. Med Clin North Am 1999;83:219-34
  2. Amedee RG, Dhurandhar NR. Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1551-1557
  3. El Hag IA, Chiedozi LC, Al Reyees FA, Kollur SM. Fine needle aspiration cytology of head and neck masses: Seven year’s experience in a secondary hospital. Acta Cytol 2003;47:387-392
  4. Tulecke MA, Wang HH. ThinPrep for cytologic evaluation of follicular thyroid lesions: Correlation with histologic findings. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30:7-13
  5. Ford L, Rosgon BM, Hilsinger RL, Cruz RM, Axelsson K, Rumore GJ, et al. Comparison of Thin Prep versus conventional smear cytopreparatory techniques for fine needle aspiration specimens of head and neck masses. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;126:554-561
  6. Bergeron C, Fagnani F. Performance of a new, liquidbased cervical screening technique in the clinical setting of a large French Laboratory. Acta Cytol 2003; 47: 753-761
  7. Abulafia O, Pezzullo JC, Sherer DM. Performance of ThinPrep Liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey. Gynecol Oncol 2003;90: 137-143
  8. Guidos BJ, Selvaggi SM. Detection of endometrial adenocarcinoma with the ThinPrep Pap Test. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;23:260-265
  9. Afify AM, Liu J, Al-Khafaji BM. Cytologic artifacts and Pitfalls of thyroid fine needle aspiration using Thin Prep. Cancer Cytopathol 2001;93:179-186
  10. Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of Thin Prep and conventional preparations: Nongynecologic cytology evaluations. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:368-371
  11. Dey P, Luthra UK, George J, Zuhairy F, George SS, Haji BI. Comparison of Thin Prep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material. Acta Cytol 2000;44:46-50
  12. Lee KR, Papillo JL, John T St, Eyerer GJA. Evaluation of the Thin Prep Processor for fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1996;40:895-899
  13. Rana DN, O’Donnell M, Griffin. Comperative Study: Conventional and Thin Prep 2000 in respiratory cytology. Cytopathol 1999;10 (Suppl.1):1-7
  14. Nasuti JF, Tam D, Gupta PK. Diagnostic value of liquid based (Thin Prep) preparations in nongynecologic cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24:137-141
  15. Luna R, Eloubeidi M, Sheffield MV, Eltoum I, Jhala N, Jhala D, et al. Comparison of Thin Prep and conventional preparations in pancreatic fine needle aspiration biopsy. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30:71-76
  16. Biscotti CV, Hollow JA, Toddy SM, Easley KA. Thin Prep versus conventiona