Journals / Türk Patoloji Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Her-2 Durumu İmmünohistokimya ile Negatif olan İnvaziv Meme Karsinomlarında İn Situ Hibridizasyon Yöntemi ile Değerlendirme (Ulusal Çok Merkezli Çalışma)

In Situ Hybridization Analysis of Invasive Breast Carcinomas with Immunohistochemically Negative Her-2 Status (A National Multicenter Study)

Pages
87–93
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This indicates the importance of quality assurance, especially in central laboratories with many breast cancer cases in daily practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of Her-2 gene amplification in breast cancer cases with a previous negative Her-2 result as determined by immunohistochemistry (score 0 or 1).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 552 cases of invasive breast carcinoma were assessed with the contribution of 9 centers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This indicates the importance of quality assurance, especially in central laboratories with many breast cancer cases in daily practice.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the rate of Her-2 gene amplification in breast cancer cases with a previous negative Her-2 result as determined by immunohistochemistry (score 0 or 1). Material and Method: 552 cases of invasive breast carcinoma were assessed with the contribution of 9 centers. Previous immunohistochemistry score was either 0 or 1+ in all cases. These cases were re-tested by Her-2 silver in situ hybridization in the central laboratory. Her-2 gene amplification was defined as Her-2/CEP 17 ratio of more than 2.2. Cases with a ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were defined as equivocal and cases with a ratio of less than 1.8 were defined as negative. Results: Re-testing of the 552 cases with silver in situ hybridization showed a total of 22 cases with Her-2 gene amplification, of which 11 (3.2%) were found to be score 0, and 11 were found to be score 1+ (5.3%) by immunohistochemistry previously. Her-2 gene amplification rate of cases (score 0 and 1+) ranged from 0% to 10.48% among the centers. Polysomy was found in 28 (8.1%) of the score 0 cases and 25 (12.1%) among the score 1+ cases. Five (9.4%) of the cases with polysomy were found to be amplified, and 48 (90.6%) were not. Conclusion: The results of the study show that a group of cases (3.98%) with a potential to benefit from anti-Her-2 therapy may be missed with the immunohistochemical method. This indicates the importance of quality assurance, especially in central laboratories with many breast cancer cases in daily practice.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Her-2 durumları önceden immünohistokimyasal olarak skor 0 veya 1+ olarak tanımlanmış meme karsinomu olgularında silver in situ hibridizasyon ile tekrar test yapılarak Her-2 pozitiflik oranının tespit edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 9 merkezin katkısıyla, 552 olgu değerlendirildi. Çalışmaya, Her-2 immünohistokimya sonucu 0/1+ bulunmuş meme kanseri olguları alındı. Bu olgulara ait parafin blok kesitlerinde merkez laboratuvarında Her-2 durumu silver in situ hibridizasyon yöntemiyle yeniden değerlendirildi. Her-2 gen amplifikasyonu, Her-2/ CEP 17 oranının 2,2den fazla olması şeklinde tanımlandı. Her-2/CEP 17 oranı 1,8-2,0 arasındaki olgular şüpheli ve 1,8in altındaki olgular ise negatif olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: 552 olgunun in situ hibridizasyon ile tekrar değerlendirmesinde skor 0 olan olguların 11i (%3,2) ve skor 1+ olanların 11i (%5,3) olmak üzere toplam 22 olguda Her-2 gen amplifikasyonu saptandı. Skor 0 ve 1+ olan olgulardaki Her-2 gen amplifikasyon saptama oranları çalışma merkezlerinde %0 ile %10,48 arasında değişmekteydi. Skor 0 olan olguların 28inde (%8,1) ve skor 1+ olan olguların 25inde (%12,1) polizomi görüldü. Polizomi olan olgulardan 5inde (%9,4) Her-2 gen amplifikasyonu olduğu, 48inde ise (%90,6) olmadığı belirlendi. Sonuç: Çalışmanın bulguları, anti- Her-2 tedaviden yararlanma potansiyeli olan bir popülasyonun (%3,98) immünohistokimya yöntemi ile gözden kaçabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu sonuç, özellikle de çok sayıda meme kanseri olgusuyla karşılaşılan merkezi laboratuvarlarda kalite güvencesinin önemini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDENER, F., İLVAN, Ş., PEŞTERELİ, E., ERGİN, M., ZORLUDEMİR, S., CALAY, Z., GEÇER, M. Ö., SÜLLÜ, Y., TUZALI, S., KARAVELİ, F. Ş., CANDA, T., SEZER, C., YAVUZ, E., SÜREN, D., DİZBAY, S. S., ÜSTÜNDAĞ, K. (2022). Her-2 Durumu İmmünohistokimya ile Negatif olan İnvaziv Meme Karsinomlarında İn Situ Hibridizasyon Yöntemi ile Değerlendirme (Ulusal Çok Merkezli Çalışma). Türk Patoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 87–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/640598

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Bilous M, Ades C, Armes J, Bishop J, Brown R, CookeCummings M, Farshid G, Field A, Morey A, McKenzieRaymond W, Robbins P, Tan L. Predicting the HER2 statusbreast cancer from basic histopathology data: An analysis of 1500 breast cancers as part of the HER2000 international study. Breast. 2003;12:92-8
  2. Perez EA, Roche PC, Jenkins RB, Reynolds CA, Halling KC, Ingle JN, Wold LE. HER2 testing in patients with breast cancer: Poor correlation between weak positivity by immunohistochemistry and gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:148-54
  3. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Schwartz JN, Hagerty KL, Allred DC, Cote RJ, Dowsett M, Fitzgibbons PL, Hanna WM, Langer A, McShane LM, Paik S, Pegram MD, Perez EA, Press MF, Rhodes A, Sturgeon C, Taube SE, Tubbs R, Vance GH, vanVijver M, Wheeler TM, Hayes DF. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptortesting in breast cancer. Arch Path Lab Med. 2007;131:18–43
  4. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: Correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987;235:177-82
  5. Tuzlalı S, Yavuz E, Canda T, Özgün Geçer M, Süllü Y, SezerSüren D, Dizbay Sak S, Calay Z, İlvan Ş, Zorludemir S, ErginKaraveli FŞ, Peştereli E, Özdener F, Üstündağ K. Meme kanserinde aşırı HER 2 reseptörü ekspresyonunun değerlendirildiği ulusal çok merkezli epidemiyolojik çalışma. 21.Ulusal Patoloji Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri; 2011 Kasım 16-21; İzmir, Türkiye 6. Lund MJ, Butler EN, Hair BY, Ward KC, Andrews JH, Oprea- Ilies G, Bayakly AR, O’Regan RM, Vertino PM, Eley JW. Age/ race differences in HER2 testing and in incidence rates for breast cancer triple subtypes. A population-based study and first report. Cancer. 2010;116:2549–59
  6. Owens MA, Horten BC, Da Silva MM. HER2 amplification ratios by fluorescence in situ hybridization and correlation with immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 6556 breast cancer tissues. Clin Breast Cancer. 2004;5:63–9
  7. Penault-Llorca F, Bilous M, Dowsett M, Hanna W, Osamura RY, Rüschoff J, van de Vijver M. Emerging technologies for assessing HER2 amplification. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;132:539-48
  8. Yaziji H, Goldstein LC, Barry TS, Werling R, Hwang H, Ellis GK, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Gown AM. HER-2 testing in breast cancer using paralle