SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Koşuyolu Heart Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in Congenital Heart Diseases

Konjenital Kalp Hastalıklarında Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme ve Bilgisayarlı Tomografi

Zekeriya KÜÇÜKDURMAZ
Hekim KARAPINAR
Ömer GÖKTEKİN
Pages
162–168
Publication Date
2012-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Cardiac magnetic resonance imagination and the computed tomography give us more suffi cient information about the morphology and the function when the fi rst line diagnostic tool echocardiographic information is handicapped.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The successes of the diagnosis and the treatment of the grown up congenital heart disease improved the prognosis of these patients by further innovations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Lifelong regular follow up is necessary for these patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Cardiac magnetic resonance imagination and the computed tomography give us more suffi cient information about the morphology and the function when the fi rst line diagnostic tool echocardiographic information is handicapped.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Konjenital kalp kusurları · manyetik rezonans görüntüleme · çok kesitli bilgisayarlıtomografi.

Abstract

The successes of the diagnosis and the treatment of the grown up congenital heart disease improved the prognosis of these patients by further innovations. Lifelong regular follow up is necessary for these patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance imagination and the computed tomography give us more suffi cient information about the morphology and the function when the fi rst line diagnostic tool echocardiographic information is handicapped.

Özet

Konjenital kalp hastalıklarının anlaşılmasında, erken teşhisinde ve modern cerrahideki ilerlemeler ve başarılar, konjenital kalp hastalığı olan hastaların prognozlarında belirgin ilerlemelere yol açmıştır. Yaşam boyu düzenli takip, erişkin konjenital kalp hastalığı olan hastaların medikal hayatlarının değişmez bir parçasıdır. Kullanım kolaylığı ve taşınabilirliği nedeniyle hala birinci derecede tanısal olan ekokardiyografi nin yetersiz olabildiği bu hastalarda, kardiyak manyetik rezonans ve bilgisayarlı tomografi ile kardiyak yapılar ve fonksiyonları hakkında daha net bilgiler elde edilebilmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKDURMAZ, Z., KARAPINAR, H., GÖKTEKİN, Ö. (2012). Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography in Congenital Heart Diseases. Koşuyolu Heart Journal, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 162–168. https://ajindex.com/articles/64057

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Therrien J, Dore A, Gersony W, Iserin L, Liberthson R, Meijbo- om F, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. CCS Consensus Conference 2001 update: recommendations for the management of adults with congenital heart disease. Part I. Can J Cardiol 2001;17:940-59. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics -2004
  2. Update. Dallas, Texas: American Heart Association, 2003.
  3. Perloff JK, Child JS. Congenital Heart Disease in Adults. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company, 1998.
  4. Babu-Narayan SV, Gatzoulis MA, Kilner PJ. Non-invasive imaging in adult congenital heart disease using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2007;8:23-9.
  5. Gatzoulis MA, Webb GD, Daubeney P. Diagnosis and Manage- ment of Adult Congenital Heart Disease. New York: Churchill Li- vingstone, 2003.
  6. Weinberg PM, Fogel MA. Cardiac MR imaging in congenital heart disease. Cardiol Clin 1998;16:315-48.
  7. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Morgan VL, Klein SS, Graham TP Jr. Nor- mal human right and left ventricular mass, systolic function, and gender differences by cine magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardi- ovasc Magn Reson 1999;1:7-21.
  8. Lorenz CH, Walker ES, Graham TP Jr, Powers TA. Right ventricu- lar performance and mass by use of cine MRI late after atrial repa- ir of transposition of the great arteries. Circulation 1995;92:233-9.
  9. Grothues F, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Smith GS, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Interstudy reproducibility of right ventricular volumes, function, and mass with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 2004;147:218-23.
  10. Geva T, Sahn DJ, Powell AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of con- genital heart disease in adults. Prog Pediatr Cardiol 2003;17:21-39.
  11. Didier D, Ratib O, Beghetti M, Oberhaensli I, Friedli B. Morpholo- gic and functional evaluation of congenital heart disease by mag- netic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:639-55.
  12. Manning WJ, Pennell DJ (editors). Cardiovascular Magnetic Re- sonance. New York: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier Science, 2002.
  13. Odegard KC, DiNardo JA, Tsai-Goodman B, Powell AJ, Geva T, Laussen PC. Anesthesia considerations for cardiac MRI in infants and small children. Pediatr Anesthes 2004;14:471-6. Shellock FG. Magnetic resonance safety update 2002: implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:485-96.
  14. Hayes DL, Holmes DR Jr, Gray JE. Effect of 1.5 Tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemaker. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;10:782-6. International MR Safety website. Accessible at w