Journals / Türk Patoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3

Direct Immunofluorescence Studies in Lichen Planus

Pages
193–197
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Direct immunofluorescencestudies are of immense help in disease differentiation in cases of interface dermatitis with no specific histological or clinical characteristics andin cases with ambiguous features.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Lichen planus is a common, usually intensely pruritic, symmetrical, papulosquamous dermatosis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Direct immunofluorescence studiesin patients with lichen planus shows deposition of multiple immunoglobulins and fibrin at the dermoepidermal junction and in the colloidbodies.Material and Method: Histopathological features were analysed in 100 cases of lichen planus which were sent for routine histology.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Direct immunofluorescencestudies are of immense help in disease differentiation in cases of interface dermatitis with no specific histological or clinical characteristics andin cases with ambiguous features.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Lichen planus is a common, usually intensely pruritic, symmetrical, papulosquamous dermatosis. Direct immunofluorescence studiesin patients with lichen planus shows deposition of multiple immunoglobulins and fibrin at the dermoepidermal junction and in the colloidbodies.Material and Method: Histopathological features were analysed in 100 cases of lichen planus which were sent for routine histology. Directimmunofluorescence studies were done in 22 out of the 100 cases and the features were analysed. Clinical data was recorded from patient files.Results: Positive direct immunofluorescence was seen in 78.5% of the cases. Deposits at the dermoepidermal junction and colloid bodies weredetected in 88% and 40% of the cases respectively. IgG, IgM and C3 deposition was seen in 88%, 70% and 24% respectively. IgA was negative inall the cases.Conclusion: The linear and shaggy deposition of immunoreactants in a discontinuous form along the dermoepidermal junction and in thecolloid bodies were indicators in support of lichen planus along with the characteristic histopathological findings. In lupus erythematosus, linearand granular deposition of immunoglobulins in a continuous form is found along the dermoepidermal junction. Direct immunofluorescencestudies are of immense help in disease differentiation in cases of interface dermatitis with no specific histological or clinical characteristics andin cases with ambiguous features.

🔖

Cite This Article

BASAVARAJ, V., JAIN, S. (2022). Direct Immunofluorescence Studies in Lichen Planus. Türk Patoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 3, 193–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/640441

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Weedon D. Weedon‘s skin pathology essentials. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier. 2010 2. Kulthanan K, Jiamton S, Varothai S, Pinkaew S, Sutthipinitharm P. Direct immunoflorescence studies in patients with lichen planus. Int J Dermatol. 2007;46:1237-41. 3. Horiguchi Y, Danno K, Ikai K, Imamura S. Colloid body formation in bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol Res. 1985;277:167-73. 4. Sumegi I. Colloid bodies in dermatoses other than lichen planus. Acta Derm Venereol. 1982;62:125-31. 5. Leena C, Papapit T, Daranporn T, Pinkaew S, Kulthanan K. Diagnostic significance of colloid body deposition in direct Immunofluorescence. 2010;76:373-7. 6. Annessi G, Lombardo G, Gobello T, Puddu p. A clinicopathologic study of scarring alopecia due to lichen planus:Comparison with scarring alopecia in DLE and pseudopalade. Am J Dermatopathol. 1999;21:324-31. 7. Helander SD, Rogers RS. The sensitivity and specificity of direct immunofluorescence testing in disorders of mucous membranes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1994;30:65-75. 8. Schiodt M, Holmstrup P, Dabelsteen E, Ullman S. Deposits of immunoglobulins, complement, and fibrinogen in oral lupus erythematosus, lichen planus, and leukoplakia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1981;51:603-8. 9. Kok SH,Wu YC, Chiu HC, Sun A, Lu YC. Immunopathological findings and immune complex in lichen planus. Derm Sinica.1987;5:1-8 10. Kumar S, Hiremath S, Kale AD, Hallikerimath S. Clinicopathological study to evaluate oral lichen planus for the establishment of clinical and histopathological diagnostic criteria. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2016;32:91-8. 11. Yamanaka Y, Yamashita M, Innocentini LMA, Macedo LD, Chahud F, Ribeiro-Silva A, Roselino AM, Rocha MJA, Motta AC. Direct Immunofluorescence as a Helpful Tool for the differential diagnosis of Oral Lichen Planus and Oral Lichenoid Lesions. Am J Dermatopathol. 2018;40:491-7.